Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

La función que ejerce un líder en un grupo tiene que ver, básicamente con el hecho de influir en el resto de personas que lo conforman, incidir en sus

e-consulta - Periódico Digital de Noticias de Puebla,Periódico Digital e-consulta, sitio de Referencia Obligada en noticias minuto por minuto de Puebla, Tlaxcala, Oaxaca Veracruz y el mundo, con secciones de Política, Gobierno, Ciudad, Educación, Universidades, Salud, Economía, Sociedad, Ecologí¬a, Seguridad, Nación, Mundo, Cultura, Turismo, Ciencia, Columnas, Artículos, cartones, videos, fotogalerías, gráficos, foros, blogs, chats, redes sociales, Twitter, Facebook, comentarios en notas, obituarios

no obsesionarse por retener el talento sino por desarrollar relaciones duraderas, incluso con profesionales de "fuera"

glen hoppner likes http://www.leadershipnow.com/leadershop/2099-6.html Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... And Others Don't Jim Collins Retail Price: $27.50 LS Price: $18.70 You Save: $8.80 (32%) Availability: Usually ships within 24 hours. Format: Hardcover, 320pp. ISBN: 9780066620992 Publisher: HarperCollins Pub. Date: October 16, 2001 Average Customer Review: Order This Book! Secure Order Guarantee Item No: 9780066620992 Description and Reviews From The Publisher: The Challenge Built to Last, the defining management study of the nineties, showed how great companies triumph over time and how long-term sustained performance can be engineered into the DNA of an enterprise from the very beginning. But what about the company that is not born with great DNA? How can good companies, mediocre companies, even bad companies achieve enduring greatness? The Study For years, this question preyed on the mind of Jim Collins. Are there companies that defy gravity and convert long-term mediocrity or worse into long-term superiority? And if so, what are the universal distinguishing characteristics that cause a company to go from good to great? The Standards Using tough benchmarks, Collins and his research team identified a set of elite companies that made the leap to great results and sustained those results for at least fifteen years. How great? After the leap, the good-to-great companies generated cumulative stock returns that beat the general stock market by an average of seven times in fifteen years, better than twice the results delivered by a composite index of the world's greatest companies, including Coca-Cola, Intel, General electric, and Merck. The Comparisons The research team contrasted the good-to-great companies with a carefully selected set of comparison companies that failed to make the leap from good to great. What was different? Why did one set of companies become truly great performers while the other