Autonomy Buys Zantaz
By Phineas LambertThe DealJuly 19, 2007
Enterprise infrastructure software maker Autonomy Corp. PLC on Tuesday, July 3, agreed to buy U.S.-based archiving company Zantaz Inc. for $375 million to exploit the growing electronic discovery market.
Pleasanton, Calif.-based Zantaz provides content archiving, electronic discovery products and software to enable organizations to retain and retrieve unstructured digital information, while Autonomy sells the platform for accessing such information.
Zantaz generated earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of $5.2 million on revenue of $100 million for the year ended Dec. 31. In the 11 years since it was founded, its VC backers have included General Atlantic Partners LLC, Athena Technology Ventures, Red Rock Ventures, ComVentures, Pyramid Technology Ventures, Geneva Venture Partners and Novus Ventures.
The purchase will be Autonomy's largest since it bought data retrieval software maker Verity Inc. for $507 million in cash at the end of 2005.
"We have been greatly impressed by Zantaz's products and will be continuing to develop and support the whole range," said Autonomy CEO Michael Lynch in a statement. "Our combined solution will be unique in offering our existing 17,000 customers end-to-end information rich risk-management solutions."
Cambridge, U.K.-based Autonomy said the acquisition will be partly funded through the placing of 12.7 million shares and a term loan. On completion, Autonomy said it expects to have about $75 million in cash on its balance sheet.
Shares in Autonomy were up almost 9 percent, or 64.5 pence, to 792.5 pence in London, giving the company a market cap of £1.67 billion ($3.36 billion). The announcement coincided with news that Autonomy expects record second-quarter 2007 results, with pretax profit and revenue ahead of the top end of analysts' forecasts.
Derek Brown, an analyst at London-based Seymour Pierce Ltd., noted that the market for electronic discovery has been fast-growing since the revised Federal Rules of Civil Procedure require businesses to make readily accessible all relevant information from unstructured data like e-mails.
"The deal provides a unique offering in the market: a hosted service for archiving combined with the applications for customers to choose which route to go by," Brown said. "There's a good cross-selling opportunity here."
Autonomy expects the acquisition to be earnings accretive in the first six months and generate costs synergies of about $25 million per annum. Tax loss carry-forwards will be assumed with a net present value of about $45 million, it added.
Steve King, the target's CEO, will keep his position as chief executive of the Zantaz division of Autonomy.
Deutsche Bank AG acted as financial adviser to Autonomy.
The deal, subject to regulatory approvals, is expected to be completed by August. Zantaz has agreed to pay a $10 million breakup fee to Autonomy, should it terminate the agreement.
Mark Osborne on 21 Feb 12Should I Take a New Hampshire Field Sobriety Test? New Hampshire Field Sobriety Tests (FST's) Everyone has an opinion about Field Sobriety Tests ("FST's"). Police, prosecutors, and other members of the law enforcement community will likely tell you that FST's are the best way to determine if someone is impaired by drugs or alcohol, short of a breath test. You may be arrested for DUI if the police believe that you did not perform well on the field sobriety tests where you walk the line and touch your nose, then we look to see why. We inspect the surface area where you were told to do the tests. We inquire as to whether the officer properly instructed you on how to take these "tests". We inquire as to whether you have any medical conditions that would have hindered your ability to perform these roadside contortions. Most defense attorneys will tell you FST's are the biggest joke going and that their results are unscientific, unreliable, and mislead judges and juries all over the country. Where do Justin and Mark stand on this issue? Well, their answer is simple - it doesn't really matter what police and lawyers thinks about FST's. What matters is this: Does your JUDGE buy into the FST propaganda. If you are in front of a judge who is skeptical about FST's, then it may not matter how "badly" you did on them. On the other hand, if you have a judge who thinks that FST's are as reliable and precise as the Hubbell telescope, then all the fuss about their unreliability isn't going to matter either. Should I Take The Field Sobriety Test? As a rule, Mark and Justin would recommend that you not take them - period. After all, if you don't take any FST's, then you won't have to worry about what your judge thinks about them. If he doesn't have any FST's to consider during your trial, then they can't be used against you. Exercise Your Rights, You Can Simply Say No! As a rule of thumb, if the police officer stopped you for s
