Hmmm. There after doing some serious number crunching it seems there is a disparity between ratings and comments. Seems that the majority of people seem to be rating 4-5 stars while the majority of the comments are just full of shit. (seriously, we sound nothing like Hugo weaving) Seems that the newfags don't know that burying the rating actually effects search results while trolling comments just makes you look like an idiot.Regards to the voice: I actually didn't do the voice, I only recorded and edited it. The person in the suit and mask is my co-worker. Originally it was just doing to be a severed head but I couldn't matte the head out very well in test footage so we said fuck it and stuff a mask on it.Many have asked so I will say here: If you want to take the audio or video and remix/splice/parody/troll it there is nothing stopping you to do so; my permission is irrelevant.P.S. When we originally planned this video it was suppose to be a joke, we'll try and push the humour more in any future videos we do.

Ch1x0rH4x (16 hours ago) Show Hide 0 Marked as spam Reply | Spam Don't make /b/ more complex than it is. This is not profound in the slightest. /b/ is about lulz, that is ALL it is about. When I stumbled across 4chan five years ago, it was garbage, and it remains, and always will be, garbage. It's the slum of the internet, and it's residents revel in it's squalor, and it is a simple concept in every sense of the term.

The crux of Carpenter’s insight, I think, is that he isn’t just interested in a privileging of sight over other senses, but a particular way of thinking of sight as touch, of imagining that the things we see are real. On a certain level, of course, we do know that if we look at a row of trees, the “trees” are real while the “row” is imaginary, but — at the same time — Carpenter is not wrong to note that we do tend to act as if these mental bridges are real. Jonathan Edwards’ notion that what God “sees” produces reality gets secularized into practices we do without thinking about it: seeing is believing, we say, and despite all the evidence that seeing a thing is practically synonymous with seeing it wrong, we can still use phrases like “photographic evidence” as if it’s not an oxymoron.

Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:21:47 No.109832016   [Reply] Any juice-fags out there? It worth it without going overboard? Any good/bad experiences with the thing?I might start enanthate only low dose for 10-12 weeks soon...

:1232043528.jpg-(41 KB, 710x387) Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:18:48 No.109831589   [Reply] Real Life memes GO9 posts and 3 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view. >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:26:07 No.109832717>>109832385Good one! >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:26:42 No.109832813     File :1232044002.jpg-(774 KB, 2048x1536)is cave man a meme? >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:27:00 No.109832856     File :1232044020.jpg-(56 KB, 489x809)they faggots

File :1232043934.jpg-(34 KB, 640x480) Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:25:34 No.109832629   [Reply] you got t-rolled

racist website Andrew Quinn 01/15/09(Thu)13:13:48 No.109830862   [Reply] you guys disgust me. my son was on this site yesterday then ran to me crying about all the racism on this site, and repetitive use of the word 'nigger' for your information i am proud of my skin colour. you're all such spotty little nerds you hide in your basement behind the guise of 'anonymous' thinking it allows you to say whatever you want. you sicken me. if you want to call me a 'nigger' say it to my face.....17 Quorn RoadSherwoodNottinghamEnglandNG5 1DT12 posts and 1 image reply omitted. Click Reply to view. >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:17:29 No.109831398On behalf of the internet I would like to apologise if your son was offended by this site. It is only a few bad apples that use that horrible and offensive word. I shall be sending a bucket of fried chicken and some mellons to you tonight. >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:17:45 No.109831442Ooo you live near me, Mr black man, sir! >> Anonymous 01/15/09(Thu)13:17:59 No.109831472Niggers don't know what Guise means

We are Anonymous.Recently, it has come to our attention that several online retailers have decided to ride the coattails of our sudden popularity by offering aparrel and other swag bearing our image. This is extremely offensive to Anonymous, as the very idea of wearing an article that identifies one as anonymous flies directly into the face of who exactly we are. We are anonymous. We cook your meals. We haul your trash. We connect your calls. We drive your ambulances and we guard you while you sleep. We put you under the knife to remove your bloated, infected spleen. We deliver your mail. We relay the evening news from the comfort of your television set, and we work dilligently to print it to give you something to read with your coffee and croissants the next morning. We are everyone and we are no one. We do not need to advertise our identity.Because our image is not a copyright, we can not stop anyone from selling items bearing it. However, we can suggest that you do not purchase these items. Wearing anything that tells the world you are anonymous compromises the veil of protection being anonymous provides, as well as cancelling out your anonymity. Wearing a t-shirt is like wearing a crosshair. You become an easy target for the Cult of $cientology and it puts you at serious risk of harm by its operatives. Use good judgement. Do not compromise yourself and your fellow Anonymous. Do not reveal your personal information to an online retailer that could possibly be a front for data mining operations by the cult.Remain Anonymous. Remain vigilant.We are Anonymous.We are LegionWe do not forgive.We do not forget.And we are certainly not some Xenu-forsaken fashion statement!