Anonymity is like a rare earth metal. These rare elements are an absolutely necessary ingredient in keeping a cell alive, but the amount needed is a mere hard-to-measure trace. In larger does these heavy metals are some of the most toxic substances known to a life. They kill. Take cadmium. Essential for life in very minute amounts; toxic in any significant amount.
Anonymity is the same. As a trace element in vanishing small doses, it's good for the system by enabling the occasional whistleblower, confessional, or persecuted dissent in a tyrannical regime. But if anonymity is present in any significant quantity, it will poison the system, even a half-rotten system.
I believe anonymity is essential. It is vital to a healthy society and market. Without the option of anonymity I believe a society would be less than optimal. Indeed I would fight vigorously to keep the option of being anonymous as an essential part of any society. It is both humane and wise.
At the same time I think there can be too much anonymity at work. When it becomes a default option it poisons the community -- like a rare-earth metal. My argument is not against anonymity but against too much of it.
Polo Ralph Lauren Homme pas cher Perry - 0 views
1More
HP Printer Technical Support Number 1-800-485-4057 - 0 views
1More
What is Marketing Asset Management? | Conduit Online Blog - 0 views
1More
Healthcare Software App Development - Software Development - EMR Software Development - 0 views
Review of American Educational System ( infographic ) - 0 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 166
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page