News Item - Employers squandering the talents of workers - 0 views
-
Too many employers are poorly equipped to weather the recession because they use workers’ skills and talents poorly, tie them up in rules and procedures, and give them little say over how they do their work, The Work Foundation says today.A major new survey of the work-lives of 2011 workers found that:• 40 per cent of employees have more skills than their jobs require.• 65 per cent of workers said the primary characteristic of the organisations they worked for was ‘rule and policy bound’ – though just five per cent said this was their preference. • 40 per cent said they had little or no flexibility over the hours they worked.• 20 per cent of graduates are in ‘low knowledge content’ jobs.
-
‘So far in this recession employers have been reluctant to lose the skills, talents and experience of their workforces. Yet at the same time they seem to be failing to make the most of them. Many people could be doing more, but are denied the chance to do so.‘To keep job losses to a minimum, organisations should be taking full advantage of widespread opportunities to give people more responsibility, move away from rules and procedure-based workplace cultures, and re-organise work and use new technologies to give individuals more flexibility over hours. More autonomy for people and less intensive management should be the order of the day – in other words greater use of the principles of good work. Trapping so many workers in roles in which their skills and abilities are poorly matched with their jobs is a waste both of economic potential and human possibility.’
Leveraging Organizational Knowledge: Corporate cultures not conducive to knowledge sharing - 1 views
The Chess Master and the Computer - The New York Review of Books - 0 views
-
It was my luck (perhaps my bad luck) to be the world chess champion during the critical years in which computers challenged, then surpassed, human chess players. Before 1994 and after 2004 these duels held little interest. The computers quickly went from too weak to too strong.
-
Having a computer partner also meant never having to worry about making a tactical blunder. The computer could project the consequences of each move we considered, pointing out possible outcomes and countermoves we might otherwise have missed.
-
With that taken care of for us, we could concentrate on strategic planning instead of spending so much time on calculations.
- ...5 more annotations...
-
A VERY interesting article reflecting on the evolution of chess under the onslaught of computers and software that play chess, and where it has all been going. The implications for Knowledge Management are there, waiting to be picked up. Discussions of tech versus human can be drawn to their ending point with it.
WEB-BASED KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT 2.0 MAP - 7 views
Le Knowledge Manager au service de la connaissance sur Journal du Net - 2 views
Knowledge Management par Arkandis - 1 views
Why You Need the Think Tank - 0 views
2013 Top 100 Influencers in #KM - Knowledge Management | MindTouch - Driving Customer S... - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
41 - 60 of 272
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page