Skip to main content

Home/ knowledge management/ Group items tagged imported

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Barbara Fillip

Dare to share! - 34 views

I have 500+ resources tagged as "KM". I'd be happy to share them but I have two questions: 1. If I put them all at once, those who receive regular updates will be flooded with updates, no?...Should...

Aimee Maron

Making the Case for KM | www.k4health.org - 2 views

  •  
    This KM toolkit helps to define in a straightforward way why KM is important, as well as ways to operationalize KM initiatives and even ways to monitor and measure KM strategies.
Aimee Maron

Dare to Share Fair - Knowledge Management Toolkit - 1 views

  •  
    KM Toolkit with solid descriptions of various important KM tools such as: yellow pages, open space, knowledge map, lessons learned, etc.
Stephen Dale

The SECI Model & Knowledge Conversion - 1 views

  •  
    Arguably the most important contributor to this subject has been Ikujiro Nonaka. He worked extensively with the concepts of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, and drew attention to the way Western firms tend to focus too much on the former (Nonaka & Takeuchi 1996). This sentiment has since been echoed throughout organisational learning and knowledge management (KM) literature (e.g. Cook & Brown 1999, Kreiner 1999, Tsoukas & Valdimirou 2001, etc.).
Vahid Masrour

2-5-1 Storytelling | Future Business - 0 views

  • 2 Who you are Summary of your experience 5 fingers Little finger – what parts of the effort did not get enough attention Ring finger – What relationships were formed, what you learned about relationship building Middle finger – what you disliked, what/who made you frustrated Pointer finger – what you would do better next time around, what you want to tell those who were “in charge” about what they could do better Thumb (up) – what went well.  What was good. 1 – the most important takeaway from the effort
Vahid Masrour

JSTOR: Organization Science: Vol. 3, No. 3, Focused Issue: Management of Technology (Au... - 0 views

  •  
    another important piece by Kogut and Zander
Vahid Masrour

The Chess Master and the Computer - The New York Review of Books - 0 views

  • It was my luck (perhaps my bad luck) to be the world chess champion during the critical years in which computers challenged, then surpassed, human chess players. Before 1994 and after 2004 these duels held little interest. The computers quickly went from too weak to too strong.
  • Having a computer partner also meant never having to worry about making a tactical blunder. The computer could project the consequences of each move we considered, pointing out possible outcomes and countermoves we might otherwise have missed.
  • With that taken care of for us, we could concentrate on strategic planning instead of spending so much time on calculations.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The winner was revealed to be not a grandmaster with a state-of-the-art PC but a pair of amateur American chess players using three computers at the same time.
  • The teams of human plus machine dominated even the strongest computers.
  • Their skill at manipulating and "coaching" their computers to look very deeply into positions effectively counteracted the superior chess understanding of their grandmaster opponents and the greater computational power of other participants. Weak human + machine + better process was superior to a strong computer alone and, more remarkably, superior to a strong human + machine + inferior process.
  • correctly evaluating a small handful of moves is far more important in human chess, and human decision-making in general, than the systematically deeper and deeper search for better moves—the number of moves "seen ahead"—that computers rely on.
    • Vahid Masrour
       
      interesting. Deserves further reflection on the implicactions.
  • Instead, every year we have new chess programs, and new versions of old ones, that are all based on the same basic programming concepts for picking a move by searching through millions of possibilities that were developed in the 1960s and 1970s.
  •  
    A VERY interesting article reflecting on the evolution of chess under the onslaught of computers and software that play chess, and where it has all been going. The implications for Knowledge Management are there, waiting to be picked up. Discussions of tech versus human can be drawn to their ending point with it.
andrewsteveburg

About Keyloggers - 0 views

  •  
    This is important and valuable information for those who have accounts in social networks or email id.
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page