academics should focus their reviewing efforts on papers in their own subfields
Reviewing also allows you to see models of best practice – and of poor practice – which can improve your own publication habits
Reviewing should be regarded not as a chance to lecture others but as an opportunity to learn, and to use your expertise to contribute to the growth of your field
"Despite the distance, remote workers make the best teammates. This is because that distance demands more communication. Without being able to lean on physical proximity, remote workers must reach out to one another frequently and with purpose. This leads to stronger collaboration and camaraderie" (2. Teamwork, ¶1. 2017.10.30).
"This list of possible publication venues and notes about them is a work in progress, to which JALT Writers' Peer Support Group (PSG) members have access with editing privileges. ... Please bear in mind that this list represents personal knowledge and serendipitous findings, rather than research-based recommendations" (Description and Call for Contributions, 2021.02.17).
"Looking to publish your research but don't know exactly how? Dealing with procrastination or stress related to academic publishing? If you are feeling apprehensive about your writing or are becoming interested in publishing scholarly work, Practical Tips for Publishing Scholarly Articles is for you. Rich Furman and Julie T. Kinn have updated this fantastic resource with even more exercises and advice to help you through the writing and publishing process. Furman and Kinn guide readers through each step of publication from idea generation through structuring an article and journal selection to submission, revision, and collaboration" (deck, ¶1, 2014.03.03).