Skip to main content

Home/ JALT Writers' Peer Support Group/ Group items tagged refereeing

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Paul Beaufait

Peer review: how to be a good referee | Times Higher Education (THE) - 0 views

  • academics should focus their reviewing efforts on papers in their own subfields
  • Reviewing also allows you to see models of best practice – and of poor practice – which can improve your own publication habits
  • Reviewing should be regarded not as a chance to lecture others but as an opportunity to learn, and to use your expertise to contribute to the growth of your field
Paul Beaufait

Language Learning & Technology - Submission Guidelines - 0 views

  •  
    "A refereed journal for second and foreign language educators and scholars" (deck, 2013.07.15)
Paul Beaufait

Importance, Citation Reports and Impact Factor | LinkedIn - 0 views

  •  
    Tetzner suggested, "It is always best to choose a refereed or peer-reviewed journal because this means that the research articles published by that journal have been evaluated by scholars and researchers who specialise in the subject area" (¶2), and recommended, "Ulrich's Periodical Directory, online access to which can be gained through most university libraries, … to determine whether a journal is peer reviewed" (¶2).
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20 items per page