Skip to main content

Home/ IT200_02 Monmouth University/ Group items tagged nyt

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Guillermo Santamaria

Jane Friedman Starts Open Road Integrated Media, an E-Book Company - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Electronic “is going to be the center of the universe,” said Ms. Friedman, a flamboyant and relentless booster of authors during her four-decade career in New York publishing. “We really think that what we’re going to do is to help transform the industry, which is built on models that we all know are broken.”
  • Although she provided few specifics, Ms. Friedman said Open Road would use a new proprietary online marketing platform to promote backlist titles on blogs, Twitter and social networking sites.
  • Because many authors signed print contracts before the growing world of e-books was contemplated, many older works are not currently available in official e-book form. Ms. Friedman has secured a contract to publish Joseph Heller’s “Catch-22” in an e-book edition and is negotiating with the estate of Michael Crichton for the e-book rights to several titles.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • And publishers including Penguin Group USA, Simon & Schuster and Scholastic have recently introduced books that intersperse video content into text.
Joanna Zietara

Idea Lab - Becoming Screen Literate - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Once, long ago, culture revolved around the spoken word. The oral skills of memorization, recitation and rhetoric instilled in societies a reverence for the past, the ambiguous, the ornate and the subjective. Then, about 500 years ago, orality was overthrown by technology.
    • Lauren Trogdon
       
      The advancement of technology has changed society. We have new and better forms of communication and do not use memorization or word of mouth to share information. It all began about 500 years ago with the type writer and first telephone. Now we have mini laptops, cell phones, and PDAS.
  • We are now in the middle of a second Gutenberg shift — from book fluency to screen fluency, from literacy to visuality.
    • Lauren Trogdon
       
      -No longer read but watch -Do even need to read if you can just hear and understand -Screens everywhere planes, bathrooms, grocery stores -Invention over taking other forms of media
  • The overthrow of the book would have happened long ago but for the great user asymmetry inherent in all media. It is easier to read a book than to write one; easier to listen to a song than to compose one; easier to attend a play than to produce one. But movies in particular suffer from this user asymmetry. The intensely collaborative work needed to coddle chemically treated film and paste together its strips into movies meant that it was vastly easier to watch a movie than to make one. A Hollywood blockbuster can take a million person-hours to produce and only two hours to consume. But now, cheap and universal tools of creation (megapixel phone cameras, Photoshop, iMovie) are quickly reducing the effort needed to create moving images. To the utter bafflement of the experts who confidently claimed that viewers would never rise from their reclining passivity, tens of millions of people have in recent years spent uncountable hours making movies of their own design. Having a ready and reachable audience of potential millions helps, as does the choice of multiple modes in which to create. Because of new consumer gadgets, community training, peer encouragement and fiendishly clever software, the ease of making video now approaches the ease of writing.
    • Joanna Zietara
       
      User assymetry- for example, it takes hundreds of hours to produce a CD or a movie, but it only takes 3 minutes to listen to a song or 2 hours to watch a movie. Industries have come up with ways to reduce the time needed to produce something, by creating cheap and unviersal tools such as iMovie, Photoshop or phone cameras.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • A Hollywood blockbuster can take a million person-hours to produce and only two hours to consume. But now, cheap and universal tools of creation (megapixel phone cameras, Photoshop, iMovie) are quickly reducing the effort needed to create moving images.
    • Lauren Trogdon
       
      -Technology is now replacing technology -Cheaper films -How far will it go? -May no longer need human actors/actresses
  • The best editors can remix video as fast as you might type.
  • TimeTube is the visual equivalent of a citation index; instead of tracking which scholarly papers cite other papers, it tracks which videos cite other videos. All of these small innovations enable a literacy of the screen.
    • Lauren Trogdon
       
      -TimeTube citation website for videos -Video is becoming so popular need citations -User-created videos some of most popular -Any one can create movie/video and put on internet
  • In classic cinematography, a film is planned out in scenes; the scenes are filmed (usually more than once); and from a surfeit of these captured scenes, a movie is assembled. Sometimes a director must go back for “pickup” shots if the final story cannot be told with the available film. With the new screen fluency enabled by digital technology, however, a movie scene is something more flexible: it is like a writer’s paragraph, constantly being revised. Scenes are not captured (as in a photo) but built up incrementally. Layers of visual and audio refinement are added over a crude outline of the motion, the mix constantly in flux, always changeable.
    • Joanna Zietara
       
      The classic way of making films would take a very long time. The film production would include a planning out of each scene and going back and forth from scene to scene. With the new screen fluency caused by the digital technology, a movie scene is considered "moer flexible". Scenes are not captured, but built up incrementally. The scenes can constantly be revised.
  • In the great hive-mind of image creation, something similar is already happening with still photographs. Every minute, thousands of photographers are uploading their latest photos on the Web site Flickr. The more than three billion photos posted to the site so far cover any subject you can imagine; I have not yet been able to stump the site with a request. Flickr offers more than 200,000 images of the Golden Gate Bridge alone. Every conceivable angle, lighting condition and point of view of the Golden Gate Bridge has been photographed and posted. If you want to use an image of the bridge in your video or movie, there is really no reason to take a new picture of this bridge. It’s been done. All you need is a really easy way to find it. Similar advances have taken place with 3D models. On Google SketchUp’s 3D Warehouse, you can find insanely detailed three-dimensional virtual models of most major building structures of the world. Need a street in San Francisco? Here’s a filmable virtual set. With powerful search and specification tools, high-resolution clips of any bridge in the world can be circulated into the common visual dictionary for reuse. Out of these ready-made “words,” a film can be assembled, mashed up from readily available parts. The rich databases of component images form a new grammar for moving images.
    • Joanna Zietara
       
      Similar advances are also occuring with 3D models and photography. Photographers can now upload thousands of their images to sites such as Flickr, and share it with others. There are 3 billion photos uploaded of Flickr as of now.
  • hyperlinks, which connect one piece of text to another
  • tags, which categorize a selected word or phrase for later sorting.
  • All these inventions (and more) permit any literate person to cut and paste ideas, annotate them with her own thoughts, link them to related ideas, search through vast libraries of work, browse subjects quickly, resequence texts, refind material, quote experts and sample bits of beloved artists. These tools, more than just reading, are the foundations of literacy.
  • Expert software can be used to identify the key frames in a film in order to maximize the effectiveness of the summary.
  • Researchers have started training computers to recognize a human face. Specialized software can rapidly inspect a photograph’s pixels searching for the signature of a face: circular eyeballs within a larger oval, shadows that verify it is spherical. Once an algorithm has identified a face, the computer could do many things with this knowledge: search for the same face elsewhere, find similar-looking faces or substitute a happier version
    • Joanna Zietara
       
      In the near future, computers will be able to recognize a human face. With this ability, a computer can then search for the same face or a substitute showing a desired emotion.
  • With our fingers we will drag objects out of films and cast them in our own movies. A click of our phone camera will capture a landscape, then display its history, which we can use to annotate the image. Text, sound, motion will continue to merge into a single intermedia as they flow through the always-on network. With the assistance of screen fluency tools we might even be able to summon up realistic fantasies spontaneously. Standing before a screen, we could create the visual image of a turquoise rose, glistening with dew, poised in a trim ruby vase, as fast as we could write these words. If we were truly screen literate, maybe even faster. And that is just the opening scene.
Matthew Kuschan

Idea Lab - Becoming Screen Literate - NYTimes.com - 0 views

    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      No longer do people focus on word of mouth but instead it seems as if people need to have something verified by technology. Instead of speaking to others, people find ways to communicate through technology and because of this people are more content keeping to themselves. It has become easier to find friends, date, and find ways to entertain yourself just through the use of technology. What more could people want? People are now able to rely solely on technology and no longer have to experience physical interaction in life.
  • We are becoming people of the screen. The fluid and fleeting symbols on a screen pull us away from the classical notions of monumental authors and authority.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      What do people think of the statement here about being pulled "away from the classical notions of monumental authors and authority." Does this have anything to do with the idea of peer review??
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      This idea was discussed in class. Soon enough a screen will not be something that we look at but it will be something we live in. People are now visualizing everything more than ever before. Screens can provide people with pictures, text, and visual clips in order to get an idea or point across. We are becoming more and more a part of screens and eventually it seems as if we will just live within them rather than use them as a major part of our lives.
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • We tend to think the tiger represents the animal kingdom, but in truth, a grasshopper is a truer statistical example of an animal. The handcrafted Hollywood film won’t go away, but if we want to see the future of motion pictures, we need to study the swarming food chain below — YouTube, indie films, TV serials and insect-scale lip-sync mashups — and not just the tiny apex of tigers.
  • The oral skills of memorization, recitation and rhetoric instilled in societies a reverence for the past, the ambiguous, the ornate and the subjective. Then, about 500 years ago, orality was overthrown by technology.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      The use or oral communication is becoming outdated. Technology has provided so many new features to help people stay in contact with eachother. Using social networks allows people from all over the world to communicate and make new friends with the click of a button. For example, I'm able to communicate with my friend from Italy via facebook. Why would someone continue to use the way of oral communication when technology has made communicatiing so much easier?
  • A new distribution-and-display technology is nudging the book aside and catapulting images, and especially moving images, to the center of the culture. We are becoming people of the screen. The fluid and fleeting symbols on a screen pull us away from the classical notions of monumental authors and authority
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      People need to realize that as technology increases in the world the objects required to do the jobs as before are getting smaller. Now, no longer are video cameras required because it is getting to the point that phones are producing perfect videos recorded when needed. For a phone to do a job that a video camera could once do is amazing. Not only is it able to call, text, get email, take pictures, go on the internet, but also now it can take flawless videos. As time goes on, the technological objects that exist now will continue to decrease in size as people continue innovating the world that we live in today.
  • Even the greatest writers do their magic primarily by rearranging formerly used, commonly shared ones. What we do now with words, we’ll soon do with images.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      Being physically able to see sometthing is more appealing to people, than reading a book. We are more dependent on seeing things, such as texting someone, or watching a movie over reading a book. We are able to relate more to real life when we can see it, seeing is believing. More and more screens are popping up everywhere to provide us with entertainment, or as a way to write a document for school. Soon everything will be made out of screens.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Danielle? How is texting seeing something anymore than writing something on a piece of paper? Did I miss your point?
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      College students seem to take for granted how easy it may be to find a definition or a link to a certain problem that is needed for homework. It comes easy to use to copy and paste words and sometimes it may be easy to do the same with pictures. However, it seems that as more and more generations continue growing up with technology the more they will be able to do without a problem. Already college students may look at the older generations that did not grow up with technology and question how they did it. As time goes on, younger generations will question us as how did we function without all these great technological innovations in our time. Just as we take copy and paste for granted, they will take certain aspects for granted as well.
  • We tend to think the tiger represents the animal kingdom, but in truth, a grasshopper is a truer statistical example of an animal. The handcrafted Hollywood film won’t go away, but if we want to see the future of motion pictures, we need to study the swarming food chain below — YouTube, indie films, TV serials and insect-scale lip-sync mashups — and not just the tiny apex of tigers. The bottom is where the action is, and where screen literacy originates.
    • Caitlin Eisele
       
      Motion pictures wont always be shown the way they are today. Previous generations would watch movies in their car while parked in a large open field with other viewer goers. Today we sit in a big indoor theater in which we can also view them in 3-D. If you wonder how future generations will watch movies you need to look at our current technology such as Youtube and our TV series.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      Yes screen play has become very popular among our entertainment today. But we can not forget the ideas the led us to this point in age. We must remember that there were stepping stones to every evolving creation. Hollywood is still a huge force in the making of movies, but other projects are beginning to spring up. These new programs maybe become more popular in a few years, but they will never erase what has been laid in stone before it.
  • Digital technology gives the professional a new language as well. An image stored on a memory disc instead of celluloid film has a plasticity that allows it to be manipulated as if the picture were words rather than a photo
    • Steven Beck
       
      This definitely shows how everyone in the world has advanced since the time when films were put on celluloid. Also, you can fit more of a movie onto a disc and are also able to rearrange the way it is to make it simpler to use and also to make sure that it flows. Putting info on a disc also means that it is now in a digital form, and that you can save the finished product onto the internet so you will always have it no matter what happens. Also by putting it on a disc, you are able to add other features like special effects, and also add the special features on DVD's.
  • Digital technology gives the professional a new language as well. An image stored on a memory disc instead of celluloid film has a plasticity that allows it to be manipulated as if the picture were words rather than a photo.
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Digital technology makes moviemaking much easier than using filmstrips. An editor can simply copy and paste certain scenes where they want, rather than having to reshoot a scene. Another positive of digital technology is that it can save much more moviemaking progress than on a film strip. An editor can add special effects to their movie using this technology on computers, rather than just using what is shot in the film. Making movies can be as simple as writing an essay.
  • As moving images become easier to create, easier to store, easier to annotate and easier to combine into complex narratives, they also become easier to be remanipulated by the audience. This gives images a liquidity similar to words. Fluid images­ made up of bits flow rapidly onto new screens and can be put to almost any use. Flexible images migrate into new media and seep into the old. Like alphabetic bits, they can be squeezed into links or stretched to fit search engines, indexes and databases. They invite the same satisfying participation in both creation and consumption that the world of text doe
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Moving images has made life for people much easier. Instead of having to mail an important document or picture, it can be simply attached to an e-mail. Images as well as documents and important information can be put up on web sites as well. All of these images can be manipulated and changed to suite a person's wants or needs. For example, if you are using facebook, a person can tag themselves in a photo and then "photoshop" different designs and words onto the actual picture. Moving images have certainly changed the way the world shares information.
  • The recent live-action feature movie “Speed Racer,” while not a box-office hit, took this style of filmmaking even further. The spectacle of an alternative suburbia was created by borrowing from a database of existing visual items and assembling them into background, midground and foreground. Pink flowers came from one photo source, a bicycle from another archive, a generic house roof from yet another. Computers do the hard work of keeping these pieces, no matter how tiny and partial they are, in correct perspective and alignment, even as they move. The result is a film assembled from a million individual existing images.
    • Steven Beck
       
      Being able to do this will make films and other movies a lot easier to make. The directors and film crews will not be needed as much since most of the work will now be done on a computer since now you are able to import and photoshop images. Also, graphic designers will become into demand more since the film crews will not be needed but they will have to draw the objects instead of filming them.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Steven I think that you still need a director even in a digital movie. There has to be someone who has the overall vision of the movie.
  • t is a formidable task, but in the past decade computers have gotten much better at recognizing objects in a picture than most people realize. Researchers have started training computers to recognize a human face. Specialized software can rapidly inspect a photograph’s pixels searching for the signature of a face: circular eyeballs within a larger oval, shadows that verify it is spherical. Once an algorithm has identified a face, the computer could do many things with this knowledge: search for the same face elsewhere, find similar-looking faces or substitute a happier version.
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Computers have the ability to recognize human beings in a picture or a motion picture. This becomes very helpful for certain things such as traffic violations, robberies, computer hacking, etc. We can also use this technology to change the appearance of somebody, whether it be for illegal purposes or for just plain fun. If a computer can recognize a human face, this helps a great deal in law enforcement. This will make it much easier to identify a person, simply by looking at different characteristics of the suspects face.
  • It is a formidable task, but in the past decade computers have gotten much better at recognizing objects in a picture than most people realize. Researchers have started training computers to recognize a human face. Specialized software can rapidly inspect a photograph’s pixels searching for the signature of a face: circular eyeballs within a larger oval, shadows that verify it is spherical. Once an algorithm has identified a face, the computer could do many things with this knowledge: search for the same face elsewhere, find similar-looking faces or substitute a happier version.
    • Steven Beck
       
      With this type of technology it can be used to find or track criminals. Also, they are working on cameras that work together and can track people throughout several cameras. Also, since the cameras are able to recognize facial features and determine the person and can let people know who is were. If a face is in a movie and they happen to have an unhappy face you are now able to subsitute it with a happier one or change it to suit the needs of the movie.
  • Academic research has produced a few interesting prototypes of video summaries but nothing that works for entire movies. Some popular Web sites with huge selections of movies (like porn sites) have devised a way for users to scan through the content of full movies quickly in a few seconds. When a user clicks the title frame of a movie, the window skips from one key frame to the next, making a rapid slide show, like a flip book of the movie. The abbreviated slide show visually summarizes a few-hour film in a few seconds. Expert software can be used to identify the key frames in a film in order to maximize the effectiveness of the summary.
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Being allowed to scan through an entire movie in seconds makes watching short films as well as long films much easier. If I want to skip to a certain scene or just watch only certain parts of a film, it is as simple as jumping to that section of the movie. This also makes teaching much easier. Since classes do not go on forever and a teacher would like to show a clip from a movie for teaching purposes, they can do this in an easy manner.
  • way for users to scan through the content of full movies quickly in a few seconds. When a user clicks
    • Steven Beck
       
      This makes life very easy becasue if you do not want to watch the entire movie, and just a section of it you can just go to the scene selection page on a DVD and peruse the items or press the skip button. The other thing that comes in handy is that on YouTube you do not have to watch the entire video to get to the part that you want to watch but you can start it from a certain part and it downloads from that part. Also when watching a movie online, one can get a brief slide show of the movie to find out if you want to watch the movie.
  • In the West, we became people of the book.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Back in the day the book was everything. People had to go to the library or read news papers to find out any information. With the invention of the internet all that changed, and everyone looked to the computer. Life changed completely.
  • There were more than 10 billion views of video on YouTube in September. The most popular videos were watched as many times as any blockbuster movie.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Internet movies are getting so popular because they are being watched just as much as blockbuster movies. The fact that they are so easy to access makes them a great place to watch and gain viewers. Many people have gotten famous on youtube and other sites like it.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      So tell me Matthew...would you stop going to the movie theater and watch your movies at home?
  • With the new screen fluency enabled by digital technology, however, a movie scene is something more flexible: it is like a writer’s paragraph, constantly being revised. Scenes are not captured (as in a photo) but built up incrementally. Layers of visual and audio refinement are added over a crude outline of the motion, the mix constantly in flux, always changeable.
  • To date most fan responses appear in text form, on sites like the Internet Movie Database. But increasingly fans respond to video with video.
  • With full-blown visuality, I should be able to annotate any object, frame or scene in a motion picture with any other object, frame or motion-picture clip.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Technology is at the point where if u can think of an idea there is a good chance you can do it. Especially when it comes to movies and film. All the action shots and crazy images are portrayed as if really happening when in reality it is just technology at it's best. Pixar is making movies now that are completely computerized. They literally have to power to do anything with these movies
  • On Google SketchUp’s 3D Warehouse, you can find insanely detailed three-dimensional virtual models of most major building structures of the world.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Google is become the new leader in internet and cyber-space technology. With there new operating system coming out, Google has microsoft terrified. There seems to be no end to this Google power strip. I can not wait to see what they come up with next.
Guillermo Santamaria

Digital Domain - Will Piracy Become a Problem for E-Books? - NYTimes.com - 11 views

  • But e-books won’t stay on the periphery of book publishing much longer. E-book hardware is on the verge of going mainstream. More dedicated e-readers are coming, with ever larger screens. So, too, are computer tablets that can serve as giant e-readers, and hardware that will not be very hard at all: a thin display flexible enough to roll up into a tube.
  • With the new devices in hand, will book buyers avert their eyes from the free copies only a few clicks away that have been uploaded without the copyright holder’s permission? Mindful of what happened to the music industry at a similar transitional juncture, book publishers are about to discover whether their industry is different enough to be spared a similarly dismal fate.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      This is what has been predicted for a time now by visionaries like Kevin Kelly and others. The publishers will have to come up with a new business model. Of course authors and publishers have to make money! But they can no longer do it by keeping knowledge and thoughts away from the public. The internet is democratizing all knowledge. The model of charging someone for information will have to change.
  • Total e-book sales, though up considerably this year, remained small, at $81.5 million, or 1.6 percent of total book sales through July.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      This is partly because of the resistance of some publishers to see Amazon as their friend. Despite their high-tech approach they are still following an outdated business model. They are a transitional force.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • We do know that people have been helping themselves to digital music without paying. When the music industry was “Napsterized” by free file-sharing, it suffered a blow from which it hasn’t recovered.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      This is a curious statement to make since record companies for decades have been "helping themselves" to the work of artists, stealing from them and in some cases not even paying them royalties (James Brown).
  • Publishers and authors are about the only groups that go unmentioned. Ms. Scheid, of RapidShare, has advice for them if they are unhappy that her company’s users are distributing e-books without paying the copyright holders: Learn from the band Nine Inch Nails. It marketed itself “by giving away most of their content for free.”
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Why are they not listed? Because publishers and authors of the magnitude they speak of are NOT "ordinary citizens."
  • After verifying that each file claiming to be the book actually was, Attributor reported that 166 copies of the e-book were available on 11 sites. RapidShare accounted for 102.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      This attempt to stop one site will fail because hundreds of others will spring up until they give up trying to stop it.
  • My book reappeared on RapidShare a few days after it was taken down
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      Of course!!!!
  • A report earlier this year by the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry, based on multiple studies in 16 countries covering three years, estimated that 95 percent of music downloads “are unauthorized, with no payment to artists and producers.”
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      The new age is coming. New business models have to be formulated. Copyright laws have become the enemy of progress and human advancement.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
  • as soon as authors can pack arenas full and pirated e-books can serve as concert fliers.
    • Guillermo Santamaria
       
      This is just ONE business model that happens to apply to the music industry. There are OTHER models that will apply to the publishing industry.
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page