Skip to main content

Home/ IT200_02 Monmouth University/ Group items tagged brain

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Linda Cranmer

The Technium - 0 views

shared by Linda Cranmer on 19 Sep 09 - Cached
  • The technium can be understood as a way of structuring information beyond biology.
  • language, and its kin writing, which introduced a parallel set of symbol strings to those found in DNA
  • the book index, punctuation, cross-references, and alphabetic order permitted incredibly complex structures within words
  • ...55 more annotations...
  • printing broadcast them
  • Calendars and other scripts captured abstractions such as time, or music
  • scientific method in the 17th century was a series of deepening organizational techniques
  • Data was first measured, then recorded, analyzed, forecasted and disseminated
  • The wide but systematic exchange of information via wires, radio waves and society meetings upped the complexity of information flowing through the technium
  • Innovations in communications (phonograph, telegraph, television) sped up the rate of coordination, and also added new levels of systemization
  • paper was a more permanent memory device than the brain; photographic film even better. Cheap digital chips lowered the barrier for storing ephemeral information, further intensifying the density of informatio
  • Highly designed artifacts and materials are atoms stuffed with layers of complex information. The most mechanical superstructures we've ever built - say skyscrapers, or the Space Shuttle, or the Hadron Supercollider — are giant physical manifestations of incredibly structured information
  • the two greatest inventions in the last 25 years, the link and the tag, have woven new levels of complexity into the web of information
  • The technium of today reflects 8,000 years of almost daily incremental increases in its embedded knowledge.
  • Every one of the 30 million or so unique species of life on the planet today is an unbroken informational thread that traces back to the very first cell.
  • Geneticist Motoo Kimura estimates that the total genetic information accumulated since the Cambrian explosion 500 million years ago is 10 megabytes per genetic lineage.
  • One study estimated the earth harbored 10^30 single-cell microbes. A typical microbe, like a yeast, produces one one-bit mutation per generation, which means one bit of unique information for every organism alive. Simply counting the microbes alone (about 50% of the biomass), the biosphere contains 10^30 bits, or 10^29 bytes, or 10,000 yottabyes of genetic information.
  • Measured by the amount of digital storage in use, the technium today contains 487 exabytes (10^20) of information, many orders smaller than nature's total, but growing. Technology expands data by 66% per year, overwhelming the growth rates of any natural source.
  • the laws of physics don't (as far as we know) improve with time, but extropic systems like life, mind and the technium do. Over billions of years they gain order, complexity, and their own self-organized autonomy — all things not present in the universe before. As Paul Davies points out, "life as we observe it today is 1 percent physics and 99 percent history."
  • Our present economic migration from a material-based industry to a knowledge economy of intangible goods (such as software, design, and media products) is just the latest in a steady move towards the immaterial.
  • Forty percent of US exports today are services (intangibles) rather than manufactured goods (atoms). Disembodiment of value (more value, less mass) is a steady trend in the technium
  • Dematerialization is not the only way in which extropy advances. The technium's ability to compress information into highly refined structures is also a triumph of the immaterial.
  • Every scientific theory is in the end a compression of information. In this way, our libraries stacked with peer-reviewed, cross-indexed, annotated, equation-riddled journal articles are great mines of concentrated information.
  • the genome of a single living organism contains more information than required by all the laws of physics.
  • If you were to take all the known laws of physics, formulas such as f=ma, E=mc^2, S= K log W, and more complicated ones that describe how liquids flow, or objects spin, or electrons jump, and write them all down in one file, they would fit onto a single gigabyte CD disk.
  • Even if we currently know only 0.1% of the actual number of laws guiding universal processes, many of which we are undoubtedly still unaware of, and the ultimate file of physical laws was 1,000 times
  • Once scientists built large scopes to examine matter below the level of fleeting quarks and muons, they saw the world was incorporeal. They discovered that matter is, at the bottom, empty space and waves of quantum uncertainties.
  • All creation is assembled from irreducible bits. The bits are like the "atoms" of classical Greece: the tiniest constituent of existence. But these new digital atoms are the basis not only of matter, as the Greeks thought, but of energy, motion, mind, and life.
  • To date, computer scientists have been able to encapsulate every logical argument, scientific equation, and literary work that we know about into the basic notation of computation.
  • The second supposition is that all things can compute. Surprisingly almost any kind of material can serve as the matrix for a computer. Human brains, which are mostly water, compute fairly well.
  • The third postulate is: All computation is one.
  • The physics of person munching on a banana is computationally equivalent to the best possible virtual simulation of the same act. Both phenomenon require the same degree of universal computation, one in particles, and one in electrons.
  • The Turing-Church conjecture states that any computation executed by one computer with access to an infinite amount of storage, can be done by any other computing machine with infinite storage, no matter what its configuration
  • The consequence of these three propositions — that computation is universal, ubiquitous, and equivalent — suggests that the logical processing of bits is the most potent form of self-organization at work in the universe.
  • If everything can compute, and all computation is equivalent, then there is only one universal computer. All the human-made computation, especially our puny little PCs, merely piggyback on cycles of the Great Computer, also known as the Universe.
  • doctrine of universal computation means all existing things — the made, the found and the born — are linked to one another because they share, as John Wheeler said, "at the bottom — at a very deep bottom, in most instances — an immaterial source." This commonality, spoken of by mystics of many beliefs in different terms, also has a scientific name: information, computation, extropy.
  • Generally, a society does not abandon a new technology to return to an earlier version. When a current technology is suspended in the natural course of evolution it is usually displaced by a more complex variation, and the old version is swept aside as a viable minor alternative, or at least a curiosity, but rarely goes extinct.
    • Caitlin Eisele
       
      Currently technology is based off of old technology. As time goes by the technological product becomes better and better. Once a product becomes more enhanced and updated people don't go back to the outdated product. Instead they use the current prodect and wait for the next to come out.
    • Justine Inton
       
      Technology is never lost. It is only replaced or improved. After bouts of trial and error as well experimentation newer, better, and more efficient versions of a technology are created.
  • Rather than a series of linear displacements climbing a ladder of evolution, the technium progresses as a widening field of accumulation.
  • Existing technologies keep operating almost intact, but are subsumed under additional new, more complex layers.
  • As any modern farmer will tell you, the glories of virtual worlds and e-commerce depend upon a rather primitive cycle of poking seeds into dirt and harvesting the replicants
  • For all practical purposes the flexibility of a technological system is eliminated once its initial choices and defaults are fixed. As systems scale up they acquire inertia.
  • The more established a process is, the harder it is to change, the more it proceeds along its path. Big technology is hard to stop.
  • This grid, built 100 years ago, lighted your grandparent's home, and our parents', and now brightens mine, and will light the lights of our grandchildren and probably their grandkids.
  • This technological longevity is almost a kind of immortality that transcends our comparatively brief lives. The technium's scope exists outside of our oversight, especially outside of our personal oversight. Its omnipresence together with its relative immortality grants it a version of autonomy.
  • The second way that technology gains a measure of autonomy is through its self-creation of needs.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Technology is constantly growing an with its growth comes addition applications. Every great piece of technology comes along with different attachments to improve the technology. The article uses the example of the cell phone. Technology can always be improved on and this is a great example of that.
  • It is this stratified stability created by extropy, evolution, and self-organization which prevents the collapse of complexity. If complexity had to re-assemble itself at every instance, nothing really complex would be possible.
    • Matthew Kuschan
       
      Because of extropy, evolution, and self-organization complexity is possible. Everything complex being organized decreases the complexity and simplifies it. The most complex ideas will never be solved without simplifing it down and making it easier to understand.
  • The technium today is entirely populated with combinations of primitive technologies that have been ratcheted up into more complex devices.
  • Progress, even moral progress, is ultimately a human invention. It is a product of our wills and minds, and thus a technology.
  • Even counting vast tracks of agriculture, the technium entails fewer than one percent of the atoms on the Earth's land surface. Yet the impact which this minute fraction of technological mass and energy has on the planet is in far disproportion to its size. Measured by impact per gram or calorie, there is nothing comparable to things we invent. Technology is the most powerful force in the world.
  • But when we trace back the origins for each agent in a field of causes, we find that each strand leads to a newly introduced technology, a new idea.  That means that new technologies today will cast a long shadow into the future and shape the lives of our descendents.
  • "New technologies are never created from nothing." Arthur observed. "They are constructed—put together—from components that previously exist; and in turn these new technologies offer themselves as possible components—building blocks—for the construction of further new technologies."
  • (Not that material processing has let up, just that intangible processing is now more valuable.) In six years the average weight per dollar of US exports (the most valuable things the US produces) dropped by half.
    • Casey Reilly
       
      now that we are in an age where big material posessions are bacoming obsolete. It is more accurate to say like in this article that intangible processing is more of a need. much like the internet is becoming a nacessity in life it is intangible, just like some of the most powerful thngs in the world like money. While money is a physical thing the value of them is determined by uncontrolable factors to the people. The most powerful things in the world today are the ones that cant be touched.
  • Most people can appreciate how the essence of living things might be information and order. Information is vague enough to be similar to the idea of a "spirit." But if my hypothesis is true — that life is an extension of a 14 billion-year old inanimate autonomous order, one that now continues into the machines of technology — then this same spirit of information must reside at the core of the non-living world as well. Although it may not dominate matter's behavior, information must rest in the essence of matter. That's a lot less intuitive. When we bang a knee against a table leg, it sure doesn't feel like we knocked into information. But that's the idea many physicists are formulating.
    • Casey Reilly
       
      when the matters life are confronted by the laws of order there are questions that always arise. Like the article says "information is vague enough to be similar to the idea of spirit," it means that living can be broken down into information. if we can be broken down into information than cant the things we create be spirit in the form of information aswell? However, just becasue this matter doesnt willingly tell us information without the process of science, does that make it any less important?
  • One computer can do anything another can do. This is why your Mac can, with proper software, pretend to be a PC, or, with sufficient memory, a slow supercomputer. A Dell laptop could, if anyone wanted it to, emulate an iPhone.
    • Casey Reilly
       
      any machine that is equal or better than another can take on the lesser ones qualities. technology is purposly doing this so that the competition cant beat them out. If mac makes a program for their computers than del would only come out with a better, i response mac would come out with something btter than the del. This process would go on forever if it wasnt for the computation. the ability to take on any others abilities if you have the storage.
  • In that curious way of life, growth triggers more growth. The web of technologies is ever expanding because a particular technology will self-generate new needs, new demands, and new appetites.
    • Casey Reilly
       
      Technology well never stay the same for long. Once you buy that new computer there is already something better being made, the same goes for existing ones that are popular or havnt been replaced yet. once you get that new cell phone there will be modifications for it in now time to make it better and resemble the machines that you use the most, your computer.
  • But where did this remarkable harvest of lawful order come from if it was not somehow "built into" that tiny file of physical laws? I claim that the trajectory of the technium was embedded into the fabric of matter and energy. If that is true, then one literal interpretation of that claim is that the 10^29 bytes of information now in the extropic realm were somehow dissolved into the one gigabyte of information of the physical laws, and unpacked over time. By the same logic, the dense leafy information displayed by a huge oak tree was previously dissolved into the microscopic informational packet of a tiny acorn, and unpacked over 80 years.
    • Linda Cranmer
       
      I like this analogy of the acorn containing the root information that is needed in order to develop into the great oak tree as it grows and matures into what it is meant to become. Just like our iinitial cells at conception contain the dna that determines what we will become (adult woman/man and contains our genetic code), the laws of physics contain the intial information that made the universe be created as it is. However, just as our dna may predispose us to have particular personality traits, we are influenced by things around us as to how those traits will evolve and conditions can influence how the oak tree grow. I believe the technium will be influenced not just by those intial laws of physics, but by the way our society evolves through our interactions as well.
  • For instance in the age of automation, older hand tools are perfect for working off the grid, or in tight spots, or in countries with little cash. In an urban world, swords are hammered out by blacksmiths for ritual purposes. Quilts are sewn by hand for recreation and community. Fish are caught by hook for sport. Leather is used for the best shoes because the improvements on leather aren't really better. Commonly, the transition to the new appears faster than it is, as the old lingers invisibly behind the glittering flash of the new. For instance, despite the dominance of automobiles on modern culture today, more bicycles are sold each year than cars.
    • Linda Cranmer
       
      Even when techology "improves" ways to do things, the old ways do not immediately disappear. The new ways may be faster and even be "improved," but there can still be uses/markets for the old ways of doing and/or making things. Sometimes people value and create a market for things made or done by "hand" or the "old fashioned" way (e.g. hand made jewelry/quilts, etc.); there is something to be said for the nostalgia factor and the feeling of accomplishment by creating someting by hand yourself.
  • Now we have the net. While some alarmists claim that Google is making us stupid, in fact Google is making us smarter by again retraining our brains. In a  2009 study Gary Small used MRI scans to demonstrate that sustained internet searching among older adults bestowed their brains with a two-fold increase in activation in several major brain regions compared to non-internet users. Experience web surfers had a significant increase in activity  in controlling decision making, complex reasoning, and vision, including the frontal pole, anterior temporal region, and the hippocampus regions of the brain.
    • Linda Cranmer
       
      I found this information to be interesting. I, too, thought that by just "googling" for information, we could be creating a generation of people who would not know how to find the information on their own without the internet. However, there really will not be a need to find the information the "old fashioned" way; the way to research information will continually evolve, never requiring to go back to the old ways, and Googling actually had a positive impact on the brain as well.
  • But not all changes induced by technology are magically positive. Industrial scale slavery, like that imposed upon Africa, was enabled by sailing ships which transported captives across oceans, and encouraged by the mechanical cotton gin which could cheaply process the fibers the slaves planted and harvested. Without technology, slavery at this massive scale would have been unknown. Thousands of  synthetic persistent toxins have caused mass disruptions of natural cycles in both humans and other species, a huge unwanted downside from small inventions. War is a particularly serious amplifier of the great negative powers brought by technology. Horrific weapons of destruction, capable of inflicting entirely new atrocities upon society, spring directly from the most powerful force in the world.  On the other hand, the remedies and offsets to the negative consequences also stem from this most powerful force. Local ethnic slavery was practiced by most earlier civilizations, and probably in prehistoric times as well, and still continues in sporadic remote areas; it's overall diminishment globally is due to the technological tools of communication, law, and education. Technologies of detection, and substitution, can remove the routine use of synthetic toxins. The technologies of monitoring, law, treaties, policing, courts, citizen media and economic globalism can temper, dampen, and in the long run diminish the vicious cycles of war.
    • Linda Cranmer
       
      This is an interesting comparision of both the positive and negative impacts technology has had on our society. Technology can be used for the good of all, but can just as well be used to control and/or harm people. We as a society must be ever vigilant in our ethical and moral obligations in our use of technology .
Guillermo Santamaria

Does the Brain Like E-Books? - Room for Debate Blog - NYTimes.com - 2 views

  • For example, they want to be online “books,” “editions,” “encyclopedias,” “bookshelves,” “libraries,” “archives,” “repositories” or (a newer metaphor) “portals.” Such structures are supposed to make intuitive the relation between individual documents and other documents. But, frankly, many of those structures didn’t work too well even in the golden age of print. (Show me one person who has made a serendipitous discovery while wandering the library stacks, and I will show you a thousand whose eyes glazed over at the sheer anomie, inefficiency, and meaninglessness of it all.) They especially don’t work well now when stretched to describe online technologies that actually behave nothing like a book, edition, library and so on. My group thinks that Web 2.0 offers a different kind of metaphor: not a containing structure but a social experience. Reading environments should not be books or libraries. They should be like the historical coffeehouses, taverns and pubs where one shifts flexibly between focused and collective reading — much like opening a newspaper and debating it in a more socially networked version of the current New York Times Room for Debate. The future of peripheral attention is social networking, and the trick is to harness such attention — some call it distraction — well.
  • Electronic reading has become progressively easier as computer screens have improved and readers have grown accustomed to using them. Still, people read more slowly on screen, by as much as 20-30 percent. Fifteen or 20 years ago, electronic reading also impaired comprehension compared to paper, but those differences have faded in recent studies.
  • Each young reader has to fashion an entirely new “reading circuit” afresh every time. There is no one neat circuit just waiting to unfold. This means that the circuit can become more or less developed depending on the particulars of the learner: e.g., instruction, culture, motivation, educational opportunity. Equally interesting, this tabula rasa circuit is shaped by the particular requirements of the writing system: for example, Chinese reading circuits require more visual memory than alphabets. This “open architecture” of the reading circuit makes the young reader’s developing circuit malleable to what the medium (e.g., digital online reading, book, etc) emphasizes.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • To a great extent, the computer’s usefulness for serious reading depends on the user’s strength of character. Distractions abound on most people’s computer screens. The reading speed reported in academic studies does not include delays induced by clicking away from the text to see the new email that just arrived or check out what’s new on your favorite blog. In one study, workers switched tasks about every three minutes and took over 23 minutes on average to return to a task. Frequent task switching costs time and interferes with the concentration needed to think deeply about what you read.
  • The screen technology, electronic ink, avoids some disadvantages of monitors, such as backlighting and flicker, but it remains awkward to scan through multiple pages.
  • Paper retains substantial advantages, though, for types of reading that require flipping back and forth between pages, such as articles with end notes or figures.
  • In brief, this brain learns to access and integrate within 300 milliseconds a vast array of visual, semantic, sound (or phonological), and conceptual processes, which allows us to decode and begin to comprehend a word. At that point, for most of us our circuit is automatic enough to allocate an additional precious 100 to 200 milliseconds to an even more sophisticated set of comprehension processes that allow us to connect the decoded words to inference, analogical reasoning, critical analysis, contextual knowledge, and finally, the apex of reading: our own thoughts that go beyond the text. This is what Proust called the heart of reading — when we go beyond the author’s wisdom and enter the beginning of our own.
  • The tools (as usual) are neutral. It’s up to us to insist that onscreen reading enhance, not replace, traditional book reading. It’s up to us to remember that the medium is not the message; that the meaning and music of the words is what matters, not the glitzy vehicle they arrive in.
  • When PC’s first entered the home in the 1980s, a number of studies comparing the effects of reading on an electronic display versus paper showed that reading was slower on a screen. However, displays have vastly improved since then, and now with high resolution monitors reading speed is no different than reading from paper
  • They switch simple activities an average of every three minutes (e.g. reading email or IM) and switch projects about every 10 and a half minutes. It’s just not possible to engage in deep thought about a topic when we’re switching so rapidly
Steven Beck

The Technium: Major Transitions in Technology - 0 views

    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      It is important to notice that the inventions that people come up with are no longer the most important aspect. It really is the way that those inventions are now able to adapt to the new technology out there. When these new inventions are able to adapt, new ideas are then proposed and the structure of information is now radically reshaped. Although the inventions should still be highly recognized, society now has to be able to take all of those inventions and alter them to the constantly changing society.
  • The major transitions in their histories are passages from one level of informational organization to another emergent level of order. Rather than catalog important inventions such as iron, steam power, or electricity, it is far more useful to dwell on how the structure of information is reshaped by new technology.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      Tehnology has become so advanced in the on coming years that it is hard to keep ontop pf what is occurring in the world. We no longer need to catalog important inventions, but rather how the world reacts to the newest inventions. Technology is over taking the world, and is changing lives everyday. We must focus on how we handle these new additions to life and adapt instead of documenting the dates of the new inventions.
    • Steven Beck
       
      When people get info then tend to pass the info on to another person. That is the same way when people learn about technology, is that they way to pass the word on to let other sknow about the new technology. As the info gets passed on, the meaning of what is trying to be said might get lost in translation. Everyone always wants to know about the newest and latest technology out on the market.
  • No transition has affected our species, or the world at large, more than the creation of language. Indeed many would define humanity by its possession of true language.
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Language is the base of all mankind. It is the way we interact as well as communicate. Without language, there wouldn't even be a thing called technology. Language brings upon words which allows us to communicate not only by mouth but by reading and writing. Believe it or not, language is the base of all technology.
  • ...11 more annotations...
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      The creation of language was by far the most important aspect in the world just by the way it has broken the barrier between people. Although at times people may think that because a person speaks a different language such as english and spanish, it may be hard to communicate with that person. However, I think that one of important ways of language would be the technical language. Regardless of whether or not a person speaks english or spanish when it comes to working with technology it is the same across the board.
  • Over time language also enabled information to be stored in a memory greater than an individual’s recall. A language-based culture accumulated stories and oral wisdom to disseminate to future generations. T
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Language has become the stepping stones to a technology based future. Once language was created and people learned to turn language into words, books were invented. Once books weren't efficient enough, humans decided to think outside the box. Through the use of technology, the computer was made, making it easier to communicate with different human languages. Technology is advancing everyday. Whether it be as simple as book or piece of paper, technology is rapidly changing. Is it for the good of mankind, or for the worst? I guess you can safely say it is a little bit of both.
    • Steven Beck
       
      If a group of people speak the same language, then they all would have the same stories. Some people might forget some while others might remember other things. In the end, the more people you have the better the chance a group has to pass on stories to future generations.
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      It is interesting that it speaks about how information can be stored in a memory greater than a person could ever recall. This sentence makes me think about what we discussed in class the other day about the only way to ensure that you can get your information back again today is through the internet. By saving files on the internet, people are able to always access them. As before people used to rely on books to store all the information needed, people are now turning to the internet to do this job instead.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      Writing has become a very important attribute to the world. It allows us to write down ideas that can be later refered to, and possibly be used to better the every growing world. The idea of writing has expanded into ascepts in life we use on a more regualr basis, such as laws enforced by government and a calendar to write down important dates and actually know the date.
  • We inject order into everything we manufacture by designing it, but now we are also adding small microscopic chips that can perform small amounts of computation and communication. Even the smallest disposable item will share a small thin sliver of our collective mind.
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Unfortunately, we believe that we can keep our lives private. However, there is no such thing as privacy anymore. Anyone or anything can communicate with you by any means necessary. Technology is going to a whole new level and is making communication a much easier thing to do. Just when you think your privacy is protected, think again, because someone will always be watching. Anyone can communicate with you, even if you do not want to communicate with them. One day, all items, technology, as well as humans, will have RFID chips installed into them, making communication easier, and making privacy non-existent.
  • No transition has affected our species, or the world at large, more than the creation of language. Indeed many would define humanity by its possession of true language. The informational aspects of language are now obvious.
    • Steven Beck
       
      The reason that langauge is the largest transition is because without language their would be no way for us to communicate. Being able to use language is the quickest way to communicate, because if we did not speak the only way for us to commnictae would be by drawing something or to use sign language and the only way that works is if someone is looking at us. Also the other benefit is that with language we can talk to someone and not have to look at them.
    • Ashley Zielinski
       
      It is amazing to think that this is the world that we are coming to after looking back on where we came from regarding information. Technology is now focusing on order and ensuring that the world is improving as each day passes. By giving technology a meaning of what it is, is only helping our society grow into becoming something bigger and more improved. As before people would have to interact with an object in order to get it to respond, now an object will be able to respond on its own.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      The world would have never evolved if it weren't for the creation of language. Language defines humanity, showing the knowlegde we gain. When language changed we were also able to see the diversity among the different people living in the world. We need to stay ontop of the language we have create and be prepared for any changes that may happen with the evolution of the world.
  • We are in the midst of a movement where we embed information into all matter around us. We inject order into everything we manufacture by designing it, but now we are also adding small microscopic chips that can perform small amounts of computation and communication.
    • Steven Beck
       
      This refers back to that everything will be able to become a smart object, and can communicate with other objects. Also everything will contian RFID tags, which then can be tracked and give out information depending upon what it is. Eventually everything will become one big virtual world, which will make everything much easier since then the world will come to you instead of you going to the world.
    • Danielle Hawkins
       
      We are in the middle of the growing world of technology. We need to embrace the changings that are happening and the ones that are on the way. Once we start to graps the reins of technology we will only be bettering ourselves. We will be living in the web in the future, so now is the time to prepare, and gain all the knowlege we can ablout the changings that are occuring now.
  • The invention of writing systems for language and math structured this learning even more. Ideas could be remembered more accurately, and just as importantly, their organization could be examined and analyzed. Ideas could also be indexed, retrieved, and propagated easier. Writing allowed the organization of information to penetrate into many aspects of life and vastly accelerated trade, creation of calendars, and laws – all of which organized information furthe
    • Cameron Nichols
       
      Reading and writing as well as math has become easier to do as technology progresses. Programs such as word and excel make reading and math as simple as clicking the mouse to a computer. Writing information down and using your brain to solve problems were only stepping stones to the future of reading and math. Humans come up with new ways everyday to make math as well as reading an easier task to accomplish, simply by using a computer.
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page