Skip to main content

Home/ MALET Issues/ Group items tagged open

Rss Feed Group items tagged

marianread

The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC - 0 views

  •  
    Mackness, J, Mak, S and Williams, R (2010) The ideals and reality of participating in a MOOC, proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning 2010, University of Lancaster, available at: www.lancaster.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/ abstracts/PDFs/Mackness.pdf' This is a peer reviewed scholarly article, frequently cited, based on mixed method research which studied the learners in the first connectivist MOOC. As such it was the first study of its kind. It appears to have correctly analyzed the relatively small quantitative sample of learners, including an instructor or two. Its contribution is to test the connectivist theory (Siemens and Downes) with a case. As noted in the abstract "The research found that autonomy, diversity, openness and connectedness/interactivity are indeed characteristics of a MOOC, but that they present paradoxes which are difficult to resolve in an online course. The more autonomous, diverse and open the course, and the more connected the learners, the more the potential for their learning to be limited by the lack of structure, support and moderation normally associated with an online course, and the more they seek to engage in traditional groups as opposed to an open network." P. 266 Analysis was focused on the "characteristics of connectivism outlined by Downes, i.e. autonomy, diversity, openness and connectedness/interactivity" p.266. Generally the research outlines the strengths and weaknesses of cMOOCs using this format. Not a lot of further research is recommended other than using a larger sample in future research and "the aims of experiencing learning within a massive open online network are constrained by a course framework and many design issues and aspects of learner experience remain unresolved." P. 273 Abstract "CCK08' was a unique event on Connectivism and Connective Knowledge within a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) in 2008. It was a course and a network about the emergent practices
Mark Ness

Open educational resources (OERs) | Jisc - 0 views

    • Mark Ness
       
      OER resources are specifically licensed to be used and re-used in an educational context by by educators and students
  • promoted
  • context
  • ...297 more annotations...
  • free access to educational resources
  • global scale
  • OECD preferring
  • digitised materials offered freely and openly for educators, students and self-learners to use and reuse for teaching, learning and research
  • New staff
  • encouraged to source open materials
  • creating new educational materials
  • provide open access to high-quality education resources on a global scale
  • OER initiatives
  • materials from more than 3000 open access courses
  • in 2007
  • benefits to educational institutions
  • and to
  • learners
  • less evidence
  • benefits to
  • people
  • expected to
  • go to the effort of releasing
  • learning resources
  • the teachers themselves
  • increased engagement of
  • academic staff
  • generated some
  • open educational practices
  • specific primary audience in mind
  • producers of OER
  • Many OER
  • NOT pedagogically or technically
  • accessible to a global audience
  • Engagement with
  • wider community
  • Engagement with employers
  • Sustaining vulnerable subjects
  • Enhancing marketing and engagement
  • prospective students worldwide
  • Brokering collaborations and partnerships
  • useful to identify which benefits are most relevant to each stakeholder group
  • articulating and providing evidence of benefits across a range of educational contexts
  • for a diverse mix of stakeholders across several sectors
  • Learners
  • benefit from
  • OER originator can benefit from
  • staff/users can benefit from
  • Educational institutions
  • benefit from
  • Other sectors
  • employers
  • public bodies
  • private bodies
  • 3rd sector)
  • Jisc has commissioned a number of studies into the â€˜sharing’ of learning and teaching resources
  • also funded a series of projects focussed on â€˜exchange’ of learning resources
  • useful to clarify what we mean by
  • terms in this context
  • sharing
  • imply an intent
  • share something of value
  • specific audience
  • more widely
  • exchanging‘
  • both/all parties
  • agree to
  • share for
  • mutual benefit
  • difference between these two actions is significant
  • reuse
  • re-purposing
  • imply an underlying principle of
  • sharing
  • useful to consider
  • sharing and exchange
  • as processes relating to OER Release
  • not intended to compare OERs
  • with commercial products
  • developed to illustrate the value in considering the different roles that exist in the production and use/re-use of OERs
  • highlight
  • importance of considering
  • end users
  • MilkRoleOERs
  • Evaluation
  • is challenging
  • ranges from
  • evaluating specific OER
  • fitness of purpose
  • changes in staff attitudes
  • impact on learning and teaching
  • impact on institutional practices and the wider community
  • range of support activities
  • support individual project evaluation across
  • three years
  • developed a framework to support project evaluation and programme synthesis
  • Evaluation and synthesis was
  • iterative
  • two-way process
  • Engaging projects with the framework
  • challenging
  • OER release
  • as much a business decision as it is a teaching and learning or academic pursuit
  • lessons learned
  • approaches adopted
  • barriers overcome
  • offer models and guidance to support wider release
  • One interesting outcome
  • institution-led projects tended towards the conclusion that OER release should be incorporated into existing strategies and policies to signal that OER release and use is an integral part of existing activities, an approach that supports ongoing sustainability and embedding into practice
  • embed OER activities in the department’s five-year strategic plan
  • develop a departmental OER strategy statement
  • widening participation strategy
  • OER initiatives
  • raise interesting questions for institutions
  • responsibility lies within an institution
  • relating to
  • legal issues
  • risk management
  • accessibility and quality of open content
  • are about institutional change and require appropriate approaches and support to help staff adjust to changes in culture that may seem very threatening
  • OER initiatives
  • UKOER projects
  • Reward and recognition
  • addressed
  • as appropriate to each institutional context
  • need to have an information technology strategy
  • way the institution will manage the opportunities and threats presented by the
  • OER movement
  • strategies to embrace
  • opportunities
  • supporting staff to adapt to
  • impending changes
  • make their own materials
  • open by
  • hosting
  • on the web
  • shared space
  • consider a range of issues affecting release
  • relationship between
  • previously been
  • OER and Creative Commons
  • ambiguous
  • clarification of
  • rather than competitor
  • Creative Commons
  • OER supporter
  • understanding
  • the market
  • teachers
  • people who are
  • potentially both
  • supplying or consuming
  • resources
  • many different contexts of use
  • Concerns around the quality
  • significant
  • Releasing these materials exposes institutions in a new way
  • staff can feel unsure that their materials will compare well with other staff
  • discoverability
  • accessibility
  • availability
  • at least as important as
  • values they embody
  • third parties are
  • OER release
  • re-use
  • re-purpose
  • remix
  • actively encouraged to
  • subject to an ongoing quality assurance (QA) process
  • OER release
  • enable
  • openly release existing materials and to investigate issues around
  • release
  • use and re-use
  • Despite fears
  • notion of open peer and student review of OER
  • featured strongly
  • often linked to funding models
  • Sustainability
  • Most funding bodies include a requirement to describe ongoing sustainability once project funding has finished
  • resulting
  • cross-institution
  • cross-subject community
  • cross-professional dialogue
  • having a significant impact on sustainability
  • development of Communities of Practice around open learning and teaching materials
  • highly likely to impact on sustainability
  • Utilising existing communities or networks is likely to be even more sustainable
  • members
  • likely to have
  • identified
  • common understandings
  • languages
  • cultures
  • Sustainability
  • only possible
  • engaged enough people in a positive way
  • significant driver for
  • OER movement
  • altruistic notion that
  • ducational resources should be available to al
  • effort into
  • raising awareness
  • educating a wide range of people
  • as to the benefits of
  • open release
  • Opening up existing courses can  provide an excellent opportunity to investigate these aspects and transform existing practice
  • open course approach
  • can have
  • significant positive impact on
  • student experience
  • transformative impact on
  • how educators perceive their roles
  • Some subject disciplines have common professional frameworks and staff may have more connection with their subject community than with colleagues from their own organisation
  • how they are
  • developed/created
  • stored
  • managed
  • made available
  • clarify which groups
  • resources are being used/re-purposed
  • Finding out how people use different kinds of content
  • varying granularity
  • help to inform these decisions
  • Cultural issues
  • significant
  • relation to
  • how people share learning and teaching resources
  • no such thing a
  • institutional culture
  • open movement
  • challenges people and groups to change
  • existing practice
  • institution-wide approac
  • can help to address some
  • cultural barriers
  • lack of strong evidence
  • around how open educational resources are used and reused
  • biggest barriers to sharing
  • factors not directly related to OER
  • ‘perceived barriers
  • point to the notion of
  • most significant barriers
  • to sharing
  • ndividuals are not necessarily interested or committed to sharing in the first place
  • also been noted
  • teachers often prefer an element of choice in who they share
  • model presented
  • technical challenges
  • responded to the need of staff
  • open some content only within the Universit
  • Hosting
  • Community/consortia agreements
  • Ownership
  • Legal issues
  • Institutional practices
  • Uneven development
  • Competition
  • Understanding
  • value and benefits
  • Legal issues
  • Hosting
  • Metadata and retrieval
  • Quality issues
  • Technical challenges
  • Legal issues
  • Quality
  • Skills/competencies
  • Time is a significant issue
  • Not all
  • aware of the benefits of releasing or using OER
  • Managing resources
  • Institution wide approach
  • Learners
  • Teachers
  • complementary method for disseminating OER
  • third party social sharing websites
  • Flickr
  • SlideShare
  • iTunesU
  • Vimeo
  • YouTube
  • Once a resource is released as an OER
  • may be a requirement
  • to track the use of it and comments made about it
  • institutions
  • Individuals and
  • releasing OER
  • need to be aware of relevant accessibility issues
  • free resources
  • available
  • when developing and releasing materials to ensure that they are as inclusive as possible
  • In addition to technical accessibility
  • OER also
  • need to be
  • pedagogically accessible
  • When OER are developed
  • a particular audience in mind
  • pedagogical context
  • might be incorporated within the OER
  •  
    EDU681102 - Module 2, Week 2. Mark Ness, article #3.
  •  
marianread

Initial trends in enrolment and completion of massive open online courses. - 1 views

  •  
    Jordan, K. (2014). Initial trends in enrolment and completion of Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 133-160. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/viewFile/1651/2813 Abstract "The past two years have seen rapid development of massive open online courses (MOOCs) with the rise of a number of MOOC platforms. The scale of enrolment and participation in the earliest mainstream MOOC courses has garnered a good deal of media attention. However, data about how the enrolment and completion figures have changed since the early courses is not consistently released. This paper seeks to draw together the data that has found its way into the public domain in order to explore factors affecting enrolment and completion. The average MOOC course is found to enroll around 43,000 students, 6.5% of whom complete the course. Enrolment numbers are decreasing over time and are positively correlated with course length. Completion rates are consistent across time, university rank, and total enrolment, but negatively correlated with course length. This study provides a more detailed view of trends in enrolment and completion than was available previously, and a more accurate view of how the MOOC field is developing." p.133 This is a peer reviewed article by a frequently cited author from the Open University who has set up for other researchers a MOOC Research Literature Browser that currently has 257 annotated research articles. It was written in 2013 using enrolment and completion data that was available on the Internet. It lists the data in a long table (for transparency) and shows in graphs enrolment and completion analysis. The article's main contribution is the aggregation of data for a large number of courses undertaken from 2011-2013 on 3 US based platforms, data not readily ava
marianread

Open educational resources | United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organi... - 0 views

  •  
    What are Open Educational Resources (OERs)? Why should I care about OERs? What are some examples of OER projects? How has UNESCO supported OERs? What is the 2012 World Open Educational Resources Congress and what are its aims? What is the Paris Declaration? How can I get involved?
Mark Ness

Microsoft Word - OER Briefing Paper _CETIS without recommendations_ - OER_Briefing_Pape... - 1 views

  • resources
  • not limited to content
  • Learning content
  • ...49 more annotations...
  • 4 • Tools:
  • mplementation resources:
  • yllabi, lecture notes, reading lists
  • projects that support the creation
  • provision and sharing of open content
  • tandards and licensing tools
  • uilding communities of use
  • Educators worldwide are developing a vast pool of educational resources on the Internet
  • open and free for all to use.
  • Inhibitors
  • nitiatives
  • Open Educational Resources
  • open access to high-quality education resources on a global scale
  • more than 3000 open access courses
  • over 300 universities worldwide
  • best-known example of OpenCourseWare sharing
  • can obtain college credit for what they have learned through using USU OpenCourseWare
  • build communities of learners and educators around the content
  • set of tools to help authors publish and support collaborative learning communities.
  • LearningSpace
  • LabSpace
  • eduCommons
  • allows institutions to easily publish OCW content via a ready-made platform
  • for efficient production of course materials
  • digital course resource systems within a university
  • built entirely of creative commons material,
  • ree scholarly material
  • free software tools
  • to help authors publish and collaborate
  • guided by cognitive principles of learning
  • stress the importance of interactive environments
  • eedback on student understanding and performance
  • authentic problem-solving
  • efficient computer interface
  • building a community that will play an important role in course development and improvement
  • user-centred, searchable collection of peer reviewed and selected higher education, online learning materials, catalogued by registered members and a set of faculty development support service
  • contains links to more than 15,500 resources
  • creating a broad and deep body of open educational content using a shared model.
  • encourages institutions to be involved in some kind of established co-operation for sharing resources with others
  • develop a common evaluation framework for all consortium members
  • OpenCourseWare Consortium’s model
  • Endowment Model
  • Membership Model
  • Donations Model
  • Conversion Model
  • Contributor#Pay Model
  • Sponsorship Model
  • Institutional Model
  • Governmental Model
  •  
    EDU681102 - Module 2, Week 2. Mark Ness, article #4.
marianread

A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives. - 0 views

  •  
    Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1). pp. 74-90. doi http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2253 Abstract "Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) are providing opportunities for thousands of learners to participate in free higher education courses online. MOOCs have unique features that make them an effective Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) approach. Institutions are offering a growing variety of MOOCs. Nevertheless, there are several crucial challenges that should be considered in the development of MOOCs, e.g., the drop-out rate of over 95% of course participants. One of the potential reasons for that is the complexity and diversity of MOOC participants. This diversity is not only related to the cultural and demographic profile, but also considers the diverse motives and perspectives when enrolled in MOOCs. This paper aims to cluster and analyze the different objectives of MOOC stakeholders to build a deeper and better understanding of their behaviors. Our main finding was a set of eight clusters, i.e., blended learning, flexibility, high quality content, instructional design and learning methodologies, lifelong learning, network learning, openness, and student-centered learning. This cluster schema creates a meaningful picture for the MOOC community" (p. 71). This is a peer reviewed scholarly article that uses qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze survey data on MOOC instructors and learners. Responses were relatively low: 158. The context is unclear - where did they get the sampling frame from? And why did they combine the learners and instructors? So there is some question as to the sample and it cannot be generalized. That said, they are innovative in their qualitative analysis. The qualitative work analyzed the open ended questions in their survey. They used a research method that allowed them to catego
marianread

Where is research on massive open online courses headed? A data analysis of the MOOC Re... - 2 views

  •  
    Reference Gasevic, D., Kovanovic, V. Joksimovic, S., Siemens, G. (2014). Where is Research on Massive Open Online Courses Headed ? A Data Analysis of the MOOC Research Initiative. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 135 -176. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1954/3111
  •  
    Marian, this is an involved research report on MOOC research initiative! Specifically, the issue of low course completion and high degree of student attrition was often pronounced as the key challenge of MOOCs & that understanding factors that affect student engagement, completion and success in MOOCs is a complicated psychological process. Theory of planned behavior (TPB) - used to study behavioral change - in the study's case, changing students intention to complete a MOOC and thus, increase their likelihood of course completion - it remains to be seen to what extent a student's intention can be changed if the student did not have an intention to complete a MOOC in the first place. What would be a reason that could motivate a student to change their intention in cases when she/he only enrolled in a MOOC to access information provided without intentions to take any formal assessments? Side note - are you aware of (or have you already taken) ESC's EDU-681111 Metacognitive Analysis: U Albany & Empire State College MOOC? Also, you may be interested in reading this article - Beyond MOOCs: Is IT Creating a New, Connected Age? EDUCAUSE Sprint 2013.
jojowil

An Open Source Software Culture in the Undergraduate Computer Science Curriculum - 0 views

  •  
    Open source software has made inroads into mainstream computing where it was once the territory of software altruists, and the open source culture of technological collegiality and accountability may benefit education as well as industry. This paper describes the Recourse project, which seeks to transform the computer science undergraduate curriculum through teaching methods based on open source principles, values, ethics, and tools. Recourse differs from similar projects by bringing the open source culture into the curriculum comprehensively, systematically, and institutionally. The current state of the project is described, and initial results from a pilot exercise are presented.(
alberttablante

The sound of the crowd: using social media to develop best practices for Open Access Wo... - 1 views

  •  
    Feedback for open access in academic libraries. Literature review. For the past nine months, Graham Stone and Jill Emery have been promoting OAWAL: Open Access Workflows for Academic Librarians on a blog site, through Facebook[TM], through Twitter[TM], and at in-person events in both the USA and UK to raise awareness of open access management issues in academic libraries and in an attempt to crowdsource best practices internationally. The in-person meetings used a technique known as the H Form, which can be applied to other areas of academic librarianship. This overview outlines the current project, focusing on feedback received, highlights some of the changes that have been made in response to that feedback, and addresses future plans of the project.
alberttablante

Copyright and Open Access - NZ Commons - 1 views

  •  
    Anton Angelo gives a librarian's view on copyright and Open Access. Based in New Zealand, Creative Commons are champions for open access.
alberttablante

Evaluation and usage scenarios of open source digital library and collection management... - 0 views

  •  
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate open source software (OSS) for digital libraries and collection management and to propose different utilization scenarios based on the characteristics of the tools. Design/methodology/approach - The tools are assessed on the basis of their technical features and options, the type of the content they manage, the support for common library operations such as cataloging and circulation, the searching support and the interoperability options. Then they are evaluated by users and finally a number of usage scenarios are analyzed based on the results of the evaluation. Findings - The basic findings of the study is that open source digital library and collection management tools offer advanced operations and support various metadata and interoperability protocols with easy and user-friendly interfaces. Most of the tools are extensively used under various settings and establishments already. Language support for the interfaces should be extended with more languages and some tools with limited operations should be improved to be of practical use. Practical implications - The findings of the paper could be used support the selection of specific open source tools for various types of establishments. Originality/value - The study reviews the characteristics of a few OSS for digital libraries and collection management and reveals their specific strengths and weaknesses. It also presents a number of realistic scenarios and proposes the usage of specific tools based on time, technology and staff constraints
cyan_corwine

Open Education: International Perspectives in Higher Education - Open Book Publishers - 1 views

  •  
    The collection of essays in this OER explore how open education resources can build a bridge towards global education and enrichment. This resource can help educators take a long-range, global view at a sustainable system, where "open" connective learning spaces have the ability to truly revolutionize education by making it accessible the world over in wholly inclusive, digitally enhanced environments.
Mark Ness

Overcoming OER barriers and finding enablers - 1 views

    • Mark Ness
       
      This is being facilitated by latest versions of LMSs (e.g., Canvas, Desire2Learn & Schoology) that support features to create program & institutional repositories for a variety of purposes.
  • Equity re access
  • Knowing what is available
  • ...44 more annotations...
  • Support and guidance
  • Quality
  • what is available
  • how to find it
  • Movement toward
  • fully open resources
  • Ensure
  • materials
  • accessible on
  • alternative technologies
  • Increased use of content
  • Encourages peer support
  • interaction
  • Encourages dialogu
  • enhances learning opportunities
  • Quality
  • likely to rise to the top
  • search engine results
  • to use resources effectively
  • poor experience
  • low quality materials
  • deter future use
  • sDiigo
  • Social software services
  •  allow users to highlight content
  • add notes
  • Time – concerns
  • wasting time looking for content
  • adapting for
  • own purpose
  • Easier retrieval
  • Central support teams
  • help with repurposing
  • Using small chunks
  • individual items
  • supplement own materials rather than trying to adapt a large package of materials
  • review
  • which
  • resource has been used by others
  • Flexible use of content
  • Educational context
  • context is unique
  • too difficult to adapt others content
  • Make generic content open to support several courses
  •  
    EDU681102 - Module 2, Week 2. Mark Ness, article #2.
  •  
marianread

HarvardX and MITx:The First Year of Open Online Courses, Fall 2012-Summer 2013 - 2 views

  •  
    Ho, A. D., Reich, J., Nesterko, S., Seaton, D. T., Mullaney, T., Waldo, J., & Chuang, I. (2014). HarvardX and MITx: The first year of open online courses (HarvardX and MITx Working Paper No. 1). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2381263 The report analyzes in detail the interaction between the students and courses and draws conclusions based on the findings and suggests further research. One of the insights that makes MOOCs quite different than traditional classroom courses is the usage patterns. The authors pointed out that "[n]ew metrics, far beyond grades and course certification, are necessary to capture the diverse usage patterns in the data. A simple comparison of grades and viewed content shows thousands of users who fit a range of profiles. Of particular interest may be those students who accessed substantial course content but did not participate in assessments." (Ho, et al., 2014, p. 3.)
  •  
    To Marian: I never really paid that much attention to MOOCs until you presented all this information on them. I suppose distance learning and MOOCs are the wave of the future. I am going to have to learn a lot more about MOOCs to understand where higher education may well be going -- at least at the undergraduate level.
  •  
    Marian: We have an unusual culture where I work. If there is work, it comes with a price. We have many faculty who feel that they need to be paid a lot more to develop in this platform model. 100 students in a course is hard for them to imagine, but much of the grading can be automated. I would like to encourage the use of MOOCs for a few reasons, but I have two that are of value to the education industry. The first is students who are unsure of their educational goals can take advantage of the free or very low cost access to content to see if the path is for them. Second, there seems to be an opportunity for increased enrollment. This is an area that many institutions across the nation are struggling with. Having so much more online availability and larger classes could be part of the solution.
marianread

The Apple Watch as an Online Learning Tool? | teachonline.ca - 0 views

  •  
    "While language learning and place-based learning linked to history, geography, sociology, and social studies are already available for such devices, the next developments are focused on using wearable devices linked to smartphones for self-assessment linked to a much wider range of learning. Imagine being a student four weeks away from final examinations in chemistry. What if your Apple Watch or smartphone asked you chemistry questions related to your course of study twice a day, every day for these four weeks? The daily feedback could help you focus review on topics you are weak in and reinforce your mastery of topics in which you are strong. These adaptive assessments are becoming more widely used and can be linked to open educational resources on the specific topics the student needs to master so as to aid their learning."
david_jones_2016

Equity considerations for open educational resources in the glocalization of education - 0 views

  •  
    From the opening remarks: "Looking only at the positives of new educational methods can mask perpetuating challenges, which makes the open aspect of OER a misnomer."
marianread

Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online c... - 0 views

  •  
    Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C. and Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 170-179). New York, NY, USA: ACM. doi:10.1145/2460296.2460330 The abstract begins as follows: "As MOOCs grow in popularity, the relatively low completion rates of learners has been a central criticism. This focus on completion rates, however, reflects a monolithic view of disengagement that does not allow MOOC designers to target interventions or develop adaptive course features for particular subpopulations of learners. To address this, we present a simple, scalable, and informative classification method that identifies a small number of longitudinal engagement trajectories in MOOCs." This peer reviewed conference paper goes on to describe how they classified learners and using data analytics from 3 courses as well as survey data from learners they developed 4 classifications. Of these classifications in addition to those who completed the courses, the auditors were of interest. They proceeded to suggest possible areas where the MOOC approaches could be adapted and tested to meet the needs of learners such as auditors. They also considered ways of increasing access and equity.
alberttablante

CORAL: Implementing an Open-Source ERM System. . - 0 views

  •  
    The presenters focused on the benefits and challenges of implementing an open-source electronic resource management (ERM) system called Centralized Online Resource Acquisitions and Licensing (CORAL) at their libraries. Originally developed by the University of Notre Dame's Hesburgh Libraries, CORAL offers libraries the option to reorganize ERM workflows and collect information about their electronic resources into one central place without having to commit funding for new software from the ever-shrinking library budget. CORAL currently includes four modules: Organizations, Resources, Licensing, and Usage Statistics. In addition to the challenges that are faced in any ERM system implementation, such as collecting and preparing data and training staff, issues specific to using an open-source application in an academic library were presented.w:
alberttablante

Promoting open access to research in academic libraries - 0 views

  •  
    Basics of Open access in Academic libraries. "A commitment to scholarly work carries with it a responsibility to circulate that work as widely as possible: this is the access principle. In the digital age, that responsibility includes exploring new publishing technologies and economic models to improve access to scholarly work. Wide circulation adds value to published work; it is a significant aspect of its claim to be knowledge. The right to know and the right to be known are inextricably mixed. Open Access can benefit both" (Willinsky, 2010). Increasingly, this capacity to close the gap between developed and less developed countries through access to information becomes more important for educational, cultural, and scientific development.
alberttablante

ACADEMIC LIBRARIES AND OPEN ACCESS STRATEGIES - 0 views

  •  
    With the rise of alternate discovery services, such as Google Scholar, in conjunction with the increase in open access content, researchers have the option to bypass academic libraries when they search for and retrieve scholarly information. This state of affairs implies that academic libraries exist in competition with these alternate services and with the patrons who use them, and as a result, may be disintermediated from the scholarly information seeking and retrieval process. Drawing from decision and game theory, bounded rationality, information seeking theory, citation theory, and social computing theory, this study investigates how academic librarians are responding as competitors to changing scholarly information seeking and collecting practices. Bibliographic data was collected in 2010 from a systematic random sample of references on CiteULike.org and analyzed with three years of bibliometric data collected from Google Scholar. Findings suggest that although scholars may choose to bypass libraries when they seek scholarly information, academic libraries continue to provide a majority of scholarly documentation needs through open access and institutional repositories. Overall, the results indicate that academic librarians are playing the scholarly communication game competitively.
1 - 20 of 43 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page