please compare the _absolute_ numbers in a graphfor example, AZARBAYJAN:2004-reform/centrist: 950,0002004-conservative: 350,0002009-reform/centrist: 837,0002009-conservative: 1,131,000so reform/centrist decreased by 10% and conservative trippled!? even as people get younger, economy worse, and achmadenijad more unpopular?
In My Humble Opinion...
This is a more important point than Mousavi being an Azeri.
Azeris do not (by my understanding) vote on as dependably ethnic lines as people in Lorestan. They do however, dependably vote reformist.
The numbers highlighted here show a huge and very unlikely swing not from one ethnicity to another, but from one political ideology to another.
Fraud.
Just from a cursory glance, you can see the official poll results don't make any sense. Look at one of the third party candidates, Karoubi. He is from Lorestan. in 2005, in the first round he took 55% of the vote in Lorestan. In these results, he takes only 5%.Extraordinarily unlikely.
city-level returns posted by the Iranian Interior Ministry on their website? These were posted by "Pejman" and translated by "Shaahin" in the comments thread to your previous post: http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/statistical-evidence-does-not-prove.html#comment-672782692382259870
I took a look at the spreadsheet another commenter linked to with the city reports and checked the frequency of all the last digits. In the Vietnam war, they faked body counts and this was statistically noticeable. Here are the counts:Last Count Normal Cummulative Distribution0 215 99.04%1 189 66.98%2 185 55.82%3 191 72.10%4 183 50.00%5 170 17.05%6 169 15.26%7 173 23.20%8 174 25.49%9 181 44.18%0 is the most popular last digit, and it is more than 2 standard deviations above the mean. It is less than 1% likely this would naturally happen.
At a press conference around midnight, Mousavi declared himself "definitely the winner" based on "all indications from all over Iran."
"It is our duty to defend people's votes. There is no turning back," Mousavi said, alleging widespread irregularities.
Bringing any showdown into the streets would certainly face a swift backlash from security forces. The political chief of the powerful Revolutionary Guard cautioned Wednesday it would crush any "revolution" against the Islamic regime by Mousavi's "green movement."
Nationwide, the text messaging system remained down Saturday and pro-Mousavi Web sites were blocked or difficult to access.
In Tehran's streets Saturday morning, Iranians heading to work gathered around newspaper stands to read the headlines, which did not specifically declare a victor — or carry word of Mousavi's claims.
Mousavi's paper, Kalemeh Sabz, or the Green Word, and other reformist dailies were ordered to change their headlines originally declaring Mousavi the victor, according to editors at the papers, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. The papers had blank spots where articles were removed.
The heavy turnout had been expected to help Mousavi. But moments after Mousavi's news conference, Iran's state news agency IRNA reported Ahmadinejad the winner. After what had been seen as a close contest, the overwhelming margin for Ahmadinejad in the Interior Ministry's partial results was startling.
By Saturday morning, Ahmadinejad had 64.7 percent and Mousavi had 32.2 percent with 82 percent of all votes counted, said Kamran Daneshjoo, a senior official with the Interior Ministry, which oversees the voting.
Mousavi appealed to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, to intervene and stop what he said were violations of the law. Khamenei holds ultimate political authority in Iran. "I hope the leader's foresight will bring this to a good end," Mousavi said.
Amid talk that the recent
election was a silent coup carried out by elements
of the hardline Revolutionary Guard after eight
years of reformist rule, Western embassies have
been scrambling to understand what the Hojjatieh
stands for and to what extent the influence of its
teachings will be felt in the new government's
domestic and foreign policies.
Ascribing something they dont understand to a liekely looking organisation from the past?
Ahmadinejad and Mezbah-Yazdi's chiliastic ideology is hardly consistent with Hojjatieh's traditionalism.
Not convinced.
The
Islamic society he belonged to at Alm-u Sanat
University where he attended was an extreme
traditional and fundamentalist group that
contained a large number of students from the
provinces and maintained grass-roots links with
the Hojjatieh. The society's anti-leftism also
chimes with reports that Ahmadinejad was pushing
for a takeover of the Soviet Embassy alongside or
instead of the US compound in Tehran during the
1979 revolution.
Slightly alarmist. probably trying to explain something they cant see properly with reference to something more obvious.
Good background on Haqani though.