Skip to main content

Home/ INF 6107 Web social/ Group items tagged patrons

Rss Feed Group items tagged

carolinebcourcy

Chefs d'entreprises : to tweet or not to tweet ? - JDN Web & Tech - 0 views

    • carolinebcourcy
       
      Article étudiant la place des dirigeants d'entreprise sur les Twitter. L'étude se base sur les patrons français, il serait intéressant de voir l'usage qu'en font les dirigeants au Canada.
Gen Lef

8 ways to persuade your boss to embrace social media | Articles | Home - 0 views

  •  
    Comment convaincre son patron de recourir aux médias sociaux? L'article présente 8 trucs pour ce faire, combinant formation et stratégie, afin de bénéficier des opportunités offertes par le web2.0.
anonymous

Les réseaux sociaux dans le collimateur des patrons américains - monde - Dire... - 0 views

    • anonymous
       
      Demander un mot de passe dans un entretien d'embauche va selon moi à l'encontre du principe d'avoir un mot de passe. Toutes les règles en matière de sécurité nous disent de ne jamais divulguer un mot de passe. Facebook est évidemment publique, il faut être conscient que lorsqu'on publie quelque chose cela sera visible par tous ou presque...un employeur me demanderait mon mot de passe facebook et je serais contre et ce, même si je n'ai rien à cacher...
gauthierf

Ce que les employeurs pensent réellement des médias sociaux - 0 views

  •  
    On a entendu à maintes reprises que les médias sociaux sont des outils importants pour les recruteurs et ceux qui se cherchent un emploi, mais qu'en est-il des patrons? Un billet illustré par des infographies intelligentes et claires qui vous démontrent les répercussions de donner un accès libre et illimité aux réseaux sociaux pour les employés au sein d'une compagnie.
Harry Sahyoun

Do we need copyright? - 1 views

  • Yet we are trained to hold copyright as a natural right. People who infringe on copyright are labelled as pirates, thieves. We are told that they literally steal from hard-working creators.
  • Fourth myth: We know that copyright makes us collectively better off. The evidence points in the opposite direction. Germany had weak copyright laws up until the Copyright Act of 1901. Yet, maybe because of these weak laws, it became a literary and scientific power: (…), only 1,000 new works appeared annually in England at that time – 10 times fewer than in Germany – and this was not without consequences. Höffner believes it was the chronically weak book market that caused England, the colonial power, to fritter away its head start within the span of a century, while the underdeveloped agrarian state of Germany caught up rapidly, becoming an equally developed industrial nation by 1900. (No Copyright Law The Real Reason for Germany’s Industrial Expansion? by Frank Thadeusz)
  • Without copyright, authors would not get paid.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Similarly, Japan, Korea and Taiwan have maintained weak intellectual property regimes. It is believed that this was a key factor to explain
  • My position: I see no justification for copyright. I am effectively a writer: I write lecture notes, research articles and blog posts. I get paid without relying on copyright. Instead, I have patrons: funding agencies, students, and blog readers. But if we insist on having copyright, it should at least be limited to a short term (say 5 years or less).
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      Copyright_Openness_collective_knowledge_conflicting_phenomena
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      1-étoile
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      Activité-A
  •  
    Yet we are trained to hold copyright as a natural right. People who infringe on copyright are labelled as pirates, thieves. We are told that they literally steal from hard-working creators.
Pierre Beaudoin

Search Results web social - 1 views

  • Fourth myth: We know that copyright makes us collectively better off. The evidence points in the opposite direction. Germany had weak copyright laws up until the Copyright Act of 1901. Yet, maybe because of these weak laws, it became a literary and scientific power: (…), only 1,000 new works appeared annually in England at that time – 10 times fewer than in Germany – and this was not without consequences. Höffner believes it was the chronically weak book market that caused England, the colonial power, to fritter away its head start within the span of a century, while the underdeveloped agrarian state of Germany caught up rapidly, becoming an equally developed industrial nation by 1900. (No Copyright Law The Real Reason for Germany’s Industrial Expansion? by Frank Thadeusz)
  • Fifth myth: Without copyright, authors would not get paid.
  • Open access
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) which would allow the government to shut down web site that is suspected of violating copyright. Using SOPA, a publisher could have a repository of research papers shut down. While at it, the publishers are also promoting a bill, the Research Works Act which would make it illegal for government agencies to require open access from publicly funded researchers.
  • we finally get a hint at why it is so hard it is to open up science: the business of science has become intertwined with businesses like the publishing business.
  • Do we need copyright? The concept of property is a social construction
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      Copyright Versus Oneness of collective knowledge a conflicting phenomena
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      Activité-A
  • First myth: Copyright is meant primarily to protect authors.
    • Harry Sahyoun
       
      3-étoiles
  • My position: I see no justification for copyright. I am effectively a writer: I write lecture notes, research articles and blog posts. I get paid without relying on copyright. Instead, I have patrons: funding agencies, students, and blog readers.
  •  
    Yet we are trained to hold copyright as a natural right. People who infringe on copyright are labelled as pirates, thieves. We are told that they literally steal from hard-working creators.
anonymous

La popularité de Teams et Slack explose - 0 views

  •  
    L'augmentation du nombre d'employés forcés au télétravail ces jours-ci se est de très bon augure pour les plateformes collaboratives comme Teams (Microsoft) et sa rivale Slack. Si les nouveaux utilisateurs se comptent en milliers pour cette dernière, on parle plutôt de dizaine de millions pour Microsoft. Espérons maintenant que cette expérimentation forcée et ses résultats convaincront plusieurs patrons d'assouplir leurs règles quant au télétravail une fois la situation revenue à la normale!
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page