IBEconomics

-highly illegal -inefficient, lack of competition 

effectively monopoly - easier to controll prices -non-kinked demand curve

Increase in Penalty Due to Decrease in supply.

Title is nearly insignificant. Focusing on the decrease in supply to the consumer, and not the increase in penalty.

Increase in price of FoP

decrease in demand 

Shift outward in demand

shift out in demand even though economic downturn in europe. Possibly because McDonalds is cheap making it popular.

expansion in supply

A supply and demand diagram showing how the loss of subsidy should affect price

 Ethanol is a substitute good of oil. High price of oil thus make ethanol relatively cheap (Calculate XED if with sufficient data)

tax credit is "sum deducted from the total amount a taxpayer owes to"  

I can talk about the multiplier effect and how increasing in spending can lead to a boost in AD

I can look at the argument made for increasing spending during a recession, and look at the argument made against.

Perhaps I could look at how political interests can mean that policies do not always pass policies that are in the best interest of a countries economy.

Inflation rate has gone down, but it's still positive, so "disinflation" is happening in the said region.

below 5% - deflation possible in future

The type of inflation the region is in could be "cost-push inflation" due to changes in the prices of oil affecting the inflation rate.

decrease in oil - oil would be part of basket of goods for CPI - inflation could be higher because governments could underrate the spending on oil and change figures 

Fall in unemployment rate will normally cause the inflation rate to increase, but in this case, it didn't

-possible shift in SRPC 

-low inflation and low unemployment is ideal for economy 

The economic growth in India has slowed down as the figures show for the first quarter of this year as it only expanded by 5.3%. There could be different reasons for this.

Concerns that mining boom is over. This would cause a reduction in GDP

Further reduction in RoI is not necessary

Panasonic (oligopolistic firm) is considering to cut workers due to recession, so microeconomics on oligopoly with the x-axis with quantity and y-axis with price can be made.

In the end, is it possible to find a way to NOT cut workers?

In your IA maybe you could add a simple note saying how long the recession has been going on.

I assume this section is saying that they are trying to reduce costs of production and increase efficiency. However, in most cases if a firm tries to lower the price they would lose customers due to price war between other firms that produce homogenous goods so it would be risky to change prices when its oligopoly. Although, their main aim is to recover its business so they are trying to cut many workers, reduce costs and increase efficiency.

Brings marginal cost shift inwards and by that also the average cost shift inwards as well 

Slush in labours at Panasonic Corps in Osaka 

supply and demand

money value went down

A shift on demand curve.

A rise in price.

Higher prices will be a disincentive to buying cigarettes 

gonna be doing this one

The attempts of government intervention to change the demand of fat in the past and what the government is attempting to repeat now, in order to change the demand of sugar and chocolate. This will also change the supply of the goods, since the tax will hit the producer as well.

This section shows the desired price, through the addition of the tax. It also gives a very exact target date for when the tax should be started up. This allows for graphs to be drawn before and after the event.

This shows how over time further taxes will be put on products, showing further change in demand and supply and the SRAS and LRAS.

Microeconomics - Supply and Demand

Current Prices 

Supply & Demand

Initial Supply Value

Not an Increase in Supply Decrease? No Change?