Skip to main content

Home/ History Teachers/ Group items tagged bias

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Cindy Marston

Pros and Cons of Controversial Issues - 13 views

shared by Cindy Marston on 25 May 11 - Cached
  •  
    Our purpose is to provide resources for critical thinking and to educate without bias. We do not express opinions on our research projects ("issue websites"). Our mission statement is: "Promoting critical thinking, education, and informed citizenship by presenting controversial issues in a straightforward, nonpartisan, primarily pro-con format."
Eduardo Medeiros

Não sorria nunca de um preconceito - Does not smile a bias - 0 views

  •  
    Se alguém algum dia disser que Karl Marx roubou o socialismo dos nazistas, creio que diante de tamanho absurdo a maioria de nós não conseguiria conter um sorriso, ou mesmo a mais ruidosa gargalhada. E se esse mesmo alguém dissesse que haveria uma escala, uma hierarquia entre as raças, de tal modo que lá num pódio de muitos níveis, em primeiríssimo lugar estivesse a raça, vale dizer, a ariana, e lá no fim, no último dos últimos, estivessem os ciganos, os negros e os judeus, creio que talvez olhássemos o profundo ignorante à procura de um sinal de loucura. Antes, é claro, da mais estrepitosa risada.
David Hilton

How Teachers Can Make the Most of When Worlds Collide | EDSITEment - 8 views

  •  
    Thanks to Dan McDowell for this one. 
HistoryGrl14 .

Story of Stuff, Full Version; How Things Work, About Stuff - YouTube - 10 views

  •  
    VERY COOL video - one of my students actually shared it with me! I plan to use this with my AP Human Geography students! In my case I may use it as an opener to the class as to what types of things we will cover and the connectedness of everything. Also great for Industrialization, Globalization, etc!
  •  
    I would like to encourage you to view or research some critiques of this material. After I viewed your post, I did some research and it looks like there is good criticism out there of this video that it portrays a one sided argument. I don't believe the video is wholly inaccurate. However, the video does present information that is easily questionable due to inaccurate and impartial interpretations. Part of our duty as great teachers it to present all facts and allow young citizens to use their own questioning to make informed decisions.
  •  
    I don't disagree with you. You don't have to 'encourage me to research critiques'. Maybe I should have written more when I posted it, but I was in a rush and just bookmarked it typed quick comments. I actually had seen the critiques. However, the way in which it is made, and things included are great for use as discussion starters and prompts for fact finding. I didn't include my lesson plan or the way I personally plan to use it, as I felt that was not relevant. I think each person can decide on their own how to use it. I agree great teachers do have a job to teach studnets to critically question and analyze - something I do all the time with my students. It helps when there is compelling items like this video to garner their interest. One of the things my students look at during our time together is motivation, and bias. So when I show it, my students will also be looking at who funded the video, and follow that trail back to look at biases that the group/companies involved might have. Also, with the different portions, as you mention, it is one sided in areas, so again, part of my personal lesson plan with this is that as we reach various portions of class that correlate with the video, my studnets will be viewing that portion and doing their own addition of the other side of the story. And I use a strategy called "philosophical chairs" and portions of this video along iwth well constructed starter questions are great for utilization in that situation.
1 - 5 of 5
Showing 20 items per page