Skip to main content

Home/ healthcare regulation and scandals/ Group items tagged examination

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Brett Snodgrass

Joint Commission JACHO | Seattle Cancer Care Alliance - 0 views

  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospitals (JCAH)
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

National Patient Safety Goals | Joint Commission - 0 views

  • The Joint Commission,
  • Standards FAQs
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Indeed Resume | Indeed.com - 0 views

  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Vessels described by Thebesius and Pratt are distinct from those described by Vieussens... - 0 views

  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Best and Worst of Times | HMS - 0 views

  • publishes papers online prior to review and then solicits open reviews from a panel of reviewers and/or the wider scientific community.
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Are State Medical Boards in Need of Reform? - State Medical Board - 0 views

  • State Medical Board
  • 2013 proposed report further illustrates the severity of the misconduct by the SBRHA.
  • MEDICAL BOARD DEMONSTRATED POOR COMMUNICATION
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • According to Leonard et al. “effective communication and teamwork is essential for the delivery of high quality, safe patient care.
  • Legislators and health care reform activists may be interested in encouraging policies and laws that ensure the SMBs are composed of those that can communicate and work in teams effectively.
  • MEDICAL BOARD COMMITTED FRAUD
  • THE DISRUPTIVE REGULATOR
  • The quality and accuracy of medical regulation is an understudied topic
  • those interested in health care policy, quality, and regulation might identify this largely unstudied area as an untapped resource with rich potential for future discovery
  • QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF MEDICAL BOARD MISCONDUCT
  • Future studies are needed to evaluate the quality of medical regulation
  • THE MEDICAL BOARD LACKED KNOWLEDGE
  • Are State Medical Boards in Need of Reform?
  • There may be conflicts of interest involving the SMB attorneys who are paid hourly and rewarded instead of punished for filing false claims in court
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
  •  
    This is a very important question! Any changes in this sphere?
  •  
    The findings on State Medical Board misconduct are concerning. Effective communication within these boards is crucial for patient safety. I think legislators and healthcare advocates should push for reforms to ensure boards comprise professionals capable of teamwork. Also, it is worth exploring various technology-driven solutions that transform the patient experience and financial performance of healthcare providers. I suggest addressing r1 rcm customer service https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/r1-rcm/customer-service.html for this purpose.
Brett Snodgrass

Mishler v. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 849 P. 2d 291 - Nev: Supreme Court 1993 - Googl... - 0 views

  • Dr. Alan J. Mishler
  • After a brief association with the neurosurgeon in Reno, Dr. Mishler, appalled at the neurosurgeon's standards of practice and his billing procedures, refused to work with him any longer.
  • Dr. Mishler
  • ...32 more annotations...
  • the Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery at Washoe Medical Center (WMC)
  • brought his concerns to the attention of
  • Governor
  • an investigator
  • he Board
  • the Board obstructed Dr. Mishler's access to the records.
  • WMC did not renew Dr. Mishler's hospital privileges.
  • As a result, Dr. Mishler could not obtain work elsewhere
  • Board denied him access to the evidence (X-rays and radiographs)
  • none of the experts had an opportunity to review the X-rays
  • When WMC initiated the hostile chart review against Dr. Mishler
  • First, the Board's timing is suspect because it initiated proceedings against Dr. Mishler five years after he treated the patients in question, when the Board knew that WMC had a five-year retention policy
  • According to the uncontroverted evidence, Dr. Mishler's colleagues, in retaliation against him for his candor
  • Board knew that Dr. Mishler had declared bankruptcy and could not afford counse
  • the Board's failure to retain the records relevant to the license revocation proceedings against Dr. Mishler demonstrates a significant degree of discovery abuse
  • Fifth, the merits of the allegations against Dr. Mishler were inadequately addressed because neither he nor any of the witnesses had the opportunity to view the X-rays and diagnostic films.
  • similar abuses
  • Dr. Mishler's surgeries were successful, the symptoms vanished,
  • The sole purpose of the power to revoke a physician's license is to protect the public.
  • Boswell held that a doctor's harsh criticism of other doctors did not warrant revocation of his license
  • the discipline was unwarranted.
  • The Board's power was not exercised for the proper and commendable purpose of protecting 297*297 the public from incompetent and negligent physician
  • Instead, the Board wielded its power to ruin the career of an outspoken physician while simultaneously protecting a possibly negligent or incompetent practitioner who had questionable billing procedures.
  • only one
  • subsequently found to be unjustified,
  • Board
  • limit the evidence
  • obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence,
  • violated the same policy
  • The Board knew that Dr. Mishler was so impoverished that he had declared bankruptcy, and that he could ill afford to hire counse
  • In short, we conclude that the Board's actions and the proceedings against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power
  • reverse the disciplinary order of the Board in its entirety and dismiss all proceedings against Dr. Mishler with prejudice
  •  
    too painful to read. torture of physicans for reporting bad doctors.
Brett Snodgrass

94 F.3d 652 - NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opi... - 0 views

  • United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • Mishler's original complaint alleged the malicious deprivation of his constitutionally-protected property right to obtain official verification of the existence of his license
  • licensing tribunal must be impartial and cannot act on the basis of personal bias.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Each party to bear its own costs. Both parties' requests for attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 are denied.
  •  
    It took 10 years of litigation to address the corruption and dishonesty of the state medical board. The state medical board members used the state's authority to pursue strictly personal agendas and they maliciously deprived Alan J. Mishler, MD, the good neurosurgeon of his constitutional rights. 
« First ‹ Previous 41 - 48 of 48
Showing 20 items per page