Skip to main content

Home/ healthcare regulation and scandals/ Group items tagged Board of Examiners i

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Brett Snodgrass

Are State Medical Boards in Need of Reform? - State Medical Board - 0 views

  • State Medical Board
  • 2013 proposed report further illustrates the severity of the misconduct by the SBRHA.
  • MEDICAL BOARD DEMONSTRATED POOR COMMUNICATION
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • According to Leonard et al. “effective communication and teamwork is essential for the delivery of high quality, safe patient care.
  • Legislators and health care reform activists may be interested in encouraging policies and laws that ensure the SMBs are composed of those that can communicate and work in teams effectively.
  • MEDICAL BOARD COMMITTED FRAUD
  • THE DISRUPTIVE REGULATOR
  • The quality and accuracy of medical regulation is an understudied topic
  • those interested in health care policy, quality, and regulation might identify this largely unstudied area as an untapped resource with rich potential for future discovery
  • QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EXTENT OF MEDICAL BOARD MISCONDUCT
  • Future studies are needed to evaluate the quality of medical regulation
  • THE MEDICAL BOARD LACKED KNOWLEDGE
  • Are State Medical Boards in Need of Reform?
  • There may be conflicts of interest involving the SMB attorneys who are paid hourly and rewarded instead of punished for filing false claims in court
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
  •  
    This is a very important question! Any changes in this sphere?
  •  
    The findings on State Medical Board misconduct are concerning. Effective communication within these boards is crucial for patient safety. I think legislators and healthcare advocates should push for reforms to ensure boards comprise professionals capable of teamwork. Also, it is worth exploring various technology-driven solutions that transform the patient experience and financial performance of healthcare providers. I suggest addressing r1 rcm customer service https://www.pissedconsumer.com/company/r1-rcm/customer-service.html for this purpose.
Brett Snodgrass

Links to State Medical Boards - 0 views

  • Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
    • Brett Snodgrass
       
      This state medical board provided the content for the article that I wrote about the quality of assessment of physicians found at - http://www.esciencecentral.org/journals/novel-insight-into-the-quality-of-assessment-of-physicians-2375-4273-1000155.php?aid=66342.
  • Links to State Medical Boards
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Novel Insight into the Quality of Assessment of Physicians | Open Access | OMICS Intern... - 0 views

  • Deviation from evidence-based regulation
  • "What is particularly egregious about SBR's [SBRHA’s] 'offer of proof ' [made during the July 2013 trial] is that it is completely inconsistent with Dr. Kern's April 18, 2013 deposition testimony. This Commission need not look any further than the first patient case, patient E.O., to determine that the offer of proof is grossly inaccurate at best and a fraudulent misrepresentation to this Commission at worst.
  • state medical boards (SMBs
  • ...18 more annotations...
  • Missouri (MO) State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts (SBRHA)
  • physician professionalism.
  • Brett Snodgrass, MD
  • physicians is overseen by state medical boards (SMBs)
  • “unfathomable and deeply disturbing [sic],”
  • “wholly unworthy of a state agency [sic],”
  • Commissioner Dandamudi’s 2013 proposed report
  • misconduct by the SBRHA.
  • severity
  • Dr. Adem’s
  • Morton Kern, MD,
  • Commissioner Dandamudi
  • SBRHA may have committed fraud
  • Dr. Jonathan Tobis
  • State Board of Registration (SBR)
  • The SBRHA tried to frame Dr. Adem several times
  • Fifth, if a single act of misrepresentation or fraud is a threat to the public, should consideration be given to the need to discipline the members of the SBRHA for their deceptive regulatory conduct
  • The SBRHA’s disruption of the practice of medicine was profound, and investigation and research into the causes of the unacceptable regulatory conduct are needed
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Mishler v. State Bd. of Med. Examiners, 849 P. 2d 291 - Nev: Supreme Court 1993 - Googl... - 0 views

  • Dr. Alan J. Mishler
  • After a brief association with the neurosurgeon in Reno, Dr. Mishler, appalled at the neurosurgeon's standards of practice and his billing procedures, refused to work with him any longer.
  • Dr. Mishler
  • ...32 more annotations...
  • the Chairman of the Department of Neurosurgery at Washoe Medical Center (WMC)
  • brought his concerns to the attention of
  • Governor
  • an investigator
  • he Board
  • the Board obstructed Dr. Mishler's access to the records.
  • WMC did not renew Dr. Mishler's hospital privileges.
  • As a result, Dr. Mishler could not obtain work elsewhere
  • Board denied him access to the evidence (X-rays and radiographs)
  • none of the experts had an opportunity to review the X-rays
  • When WMC initiated the hostile chart review against Dr. Mishler
  • First, the Board's timing is suspect because it initiated proceedings against Dr. Mishler five years after he treated the patients in question, when the Board knew that WMC had a five-year retention policy
  • According to the uncontroverted evidence, Dr. Mishler's colleagues, in retaliation against him for his candor
  • Board knew that Dr. Mishler had declared bankruptcy and could not afford counse
  • the Board's failure to retain the records relevant to the license revocation proceedings against Dr. Mishler demonstrates a significant degree of discovery abuse
  • Fifth, the merits of the allegations against Dr. Mishler were inadequately addressed because neither he nor any of the witnesses had the opportunity to view the X-rays and diagnostic films.
  • similar abuses
  • Dr. Mishler's surgeries were successful, the symptoms vanished,
  • The sole purpose of the power to revoke a physician's license is to protect the public.
  • Boswell held that a doctor's harsh criticism of other doctors did not warrant revocation of his license
  • the discipline was unwarranted.
  • The Board's power was not exercised for the proper and commendable purpose of protecting 297*297 the public from incompetent and negligent physician
  • Instead, the Board wielded its power to ruin the career of an outspoken physician while simultaneously protecting a possibly negligent or incompetent practitioner who had questionable billing procedures.
  • only one
  • subsequently found to be unjustified,
  • Board
  • limit the evidence
  • obstruct Dr. Mishler's access to evidence,
  • violated the same policy
  • The Board knew that Dr. Mishler was so impoverished that he had declared bankruptcy, and that he could ill afford to hire counse
  • In short, we conclude that the Board's actions and the proceedings against Dr. Mishler constituted a disturbing abuse of its power
  • reverse the disciplinary order of the Board in its entirety and dismiss all proceedings against Dr. Mishler with prejudice
  •  
    too painful to read. torture of physicans for reporting bad doctors.
Brett Snodgrass

American Telemedicine Association Petitions State To Not Limit The Practice «... - 0 views

  • the Texas State Board of Examiners of Professional Counselors
  • recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling could leave the board open to federal antitrust suits i
  • N.C. State Board of Dental Examiners v. Federal Trade Commission
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Improvement in quality - State Medical Board Commits Honest Actions - 0 views

    • Brett Snodgrass
       
      Almost all of these cases are completely archived except for one file - that file is usually the ruling by the judge. In this case, someone archived the ruling that rebuked the Missouri State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts on every one of their 137 charges. However, the claim can still be found at https://archive.org/details/Medical-Board-vs-Paskon. #Healthcare 
  • Case No.:   #02-1491 HA Title:  State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts vs. Paskon, M.D., Seth
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

Clinical peer review - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • Sham peer review i
  • "incompetent peer review
  • Missouri Board of Registration for the Healing Arts
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Missouri state medical board
  • mistakenly concluded that the cardiologist was repeatedly negligent and was a danger to the safety of the public.
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
Brett Snodgrass

VM -- Professional Self-Regulation in Medicine, Apr 14 ... Virtual Mentor - 0 views

  • Rationale for Professional Regulation From a public policy perspective, the rationale for professional regulation of medicine is patient protection [1]. Patients generally lack the knowledge, skills, or judgment to diagnose or treat disease and, thus, have strong incentives to rely on caregivers with specialized expertise
  •  
    This article provides insight into the quality of medical regulation by a state medical board.
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page