Colonialism did not, however, merely impact the development of those societies that did the colonising. Most obviously, it also affected the societies that were colonised. In our research (Acemoglu et al. 2001, 2002) we showed that this, again, had heterogeneous effects. This is because colonialism ended up creating very distinct sorts of societies in different places. In particular, colonialism left very different institutional legacies in different parts of the world, with profoundly divergent consequences for economic development. The reason for this is not that the various European powers transplanted different sorts of institutions – so that North America succeeded due to an inheritance of British institutions, while Latin America failed because of its Spanish institutions. In fact, the evidence suggests that the intentions and strategies of distinct colonial powers were very similar (Acemoglu and Robinson 2012). The outcomes were very different because of variation in initial conditions in the colonies.
The Post-Human World - 0 views
Local is the New Federal - 1 views
The Observer view on Mark Zuckerberg | Observer editorial - 0 views
U.S. Resistance to Targeting of Immigrants Becomes a Self-Organized System - 1 views
'An engineering feat' - The Columbus Dispatch, 2017-02-19 - 0 views
Pyramid of Impact model - 0 views
Better cheese through science - The Columbus Dispatch, 2017-02-18 - 0 views
In the age of robots, our schools are teaching children to be redundant | George Monbiot - 0 views
Welcome to the new dark ages, where only the wealthy can retire | Peter Fleming | Opini... - 0 views
The call for citizens to 'go local' - CSMonitor.com - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
10301 - 10320 of 10729
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page