When the Senate Intelligence Committee passed the Cybersecurity Information Sharing Act by a vote of 14 to 1, committee chairman Senator Richard Burr argued that it successfully balanced security and privacy. Fifteen new amendments to the bill, he said, were designed to protect internet users’ personal information while enabling new ways for companies and federal agencies to coordinate responses to cyberattacks. But critics within the security and privacy communities still have two fundamental problems with the legislation: First, they say, the proposed cybersecurity act won’t actually boost security. And second, the “information sharing” it describes sounds more than ever like a backchannel for surveillance.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
1More
1More
Warner Music Group Kills Online Record Store Insound - Digital Music News [#Note] - 0 views
1More
Wizzard Technical Design - WordPress Security 2015 Infographic - 1 views
7More
Tech firms and privacy groups press for curbs on NSA surveillance powers - The Washingt... - 0 views
1More
What Teens Really Think About YouTube, Google+, Reddit and Other Social Media - Backcha... - 0 views
1More
The kernel of the argument over Linux's vulnerabilities | The Washington Post - 0 views
Comcast data caps aren't about congestion, leaked memo shows | ITworld - 1 views
6More
Microsoft to host data in Germany to evade US spying | Naked Security - 0 views
3More
Editorial: Wikipedia fails as an encyclopedia, to science's detriment | Ars Technica UK... - 0 views
1More
Schedule your social media marketing with CampaignChain | Linux User & Developer - the ... - 0 views
2More
EE.UU. admite que puede utilizar los dispositivos caseros para espiar a sus ciudadanos ... - 0 views
1More
Google Asked to Remove 100,000 'Pirate Links' Every Hour - TorrentFreak - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
881 - 900 of 959
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page