The first question was could (or even should) Wolfram Alpha be built using the Semantic Web in some manner, rather than (or as well as) the Mathematica engine it is currently built on. Is anything missed by not building it with Semantic Web's languages (RDF, OWL, Sparql, etc.)?
The answer is that there is no reason that one MUST use the Semantic Web stack to build something like Wolfram Alpha. In fact, in my opinion it would be far too difficult to try to explicitly represent everything Wolfram Alpha knows and can compute using OWL ontologies. It is too wide a range of human knowledge and giant OWL ontologies are just too difficult to build and curate.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
2More
2More
Windows 7, 8, and 10: Now all collecting user data for Microsoft | InfoWorld - 1 views
2More
Big Tech Does Not Speak for the Internet | Electronic Frontier Foundation - 0 views
2More
MPAA says 1st Amendment protects studios from Google "fishing expedition" | Ars Technica - 1 views
2More
Google Refuses MPAA Request to Blacklist 'Pirate Site' Homepages | TorrentFreak - 0 views
2More
Meet the Dogged Researchers Who Try to Unmask Haters Online | MIT Technology Review - 0 views
2More
Microsoft Office comes to Google's Chrome OS -- now who's Scroogled? - 1 views
1More
Net Neutrality: BEREC on the Right Path, Let's Keep the Pressure on | La Quadrature du Net - 0 views
2More
Rightscorp Revenues Collapse, Pirates Too Hard to Track - TorrentFreak - 1 views
1More
Unlimited Data Plans Are Back-With Some Big Catches | WIRED - 0 views
2More
How The Internet Is Destroying Our Lives Too | LinkedIn - 0 views
1More
Inside Eve: Online's propaganda machine-from Photoshop to DDoS | Ars Technica UK [# ! N... - 0 views
1More
The New Payola: Deals Landlords Cut with Internet Providers - Backchannel - 1 views
‹ Previous
21 - 40 of 164
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page