Skip to main content

Home/ Film351-remix/ Group items tagged expression

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Matt Schofield

The Evolution of Remix Culture - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    A youtube video who analyses the implications of remix culture on our society as it grows to be a platform for collective expression
Giedre Stankeviciute

Bill O'Reilly: "F*CK IT WE'LL DO IT LIVE" - That Video Site - 0 views

  •  
    Bill's blast from the past. It's funny how disconnected a TV persona is from the contemporary life, people, and even expressions (?): "to play us out...what does that even mean?" (I am also about to post a remix of this video).
Alanna Wildermuth

Alanna Wildermuth (alw2012) on Pinterest - 1 views

  •  
    Pinterest is an online forum where people can post articles, videos, recipes, photos, etc., that express their own interests. It is a fascinating way in which "every consumer gets courted across multiple media platforms" since each person's pinterest "boards" depict multiple ways of gathering information and appeals to popular cultural phenomenons. It is also very similar to diigo in many ways that I think is interesting- different websites that are used to organize the mass amount of information that people encounter while searching the web.
  •  
    For me, pinterest is the place where I, as the syllabus says, "keep found things found"
Matt Schofield

YMRarticle_February08.pdf (application/pdf Object) - 0 views

  •  
    How youth in society are using the remix via new media to express their own ideas
klward21

Mashup: A Fair Use Defense - 0 views

  • transformative
  • substantiality of the portion used
  • can provide an entirely new context for the original works
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • effect on the market for the original work
  • fair use doctrine was meant to protect
  • first amendment expression that the
  • Bridgeport decision, which deems all sampling to be copyright infringement regardless of the particular use, seems to be going too far
  •  
    If one remix/mashup is ruled to be under fair use could all potentially be fair use as well? ... Has one been ruled fair use? If so, why isn't that case used as landmark/"resource" case for others
Troy Davis

Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc., 510 U.S. 517 (1994). - 0 views

  •  
    While it is true that oneof the goals of the Copyright Act is to discourage infringement, it is by no means the only goal of that Act. The Constitution grants to Congress the power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." U. S. Const., Art. I, § 8, cl. 8. We have often recognized the monopoly privileges that Congress has authorized, while "intended to motivate the creative activity of authors and inventors by the provision of a special reward," are limited in nature and must ultimately serve the public good. For example, in Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken, 422 U.S. 151, 156 (1975), we discussed the policies underlying the 1909 Copyright Act as follows: "The limited scope of the copyright holder's statutory monopoly . . . reflects a balance of competing claims upon the public interest: Creative work is to be encouraged and rewarded, but private motivation must ultimately serve the cause of promoting broad public availability of literature, music, and the other arts. The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an `author's' creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good." (Footnotes omitted.) We reiterated this theme in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340, 349-350 (1991), where we said: "The primary objective of copyright is not to reward the labor of authors, but `[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.' To this end, copyright assures authors the right to their original expression, but encourages others to build freely upon the ideas and information conveyed by a work." (Citations omitted.) Because copyright law ultimately serves the purpose of enriching the general public through access to creative works, it is peculiarly important that the boundaries of copyrigh
Maria Dougherty

How Schools are Training the New Generation - 0 views

  •  
    The New Media Interdisciplinary Concentration explores the expressive and communicative possibilities of digital media across the contexts of advertising, broadcast, film, journalism, mass communication, public relations, and Theater.
Giedre Stankeviciute

pirateradio - 0 views

  • Radio "piracy" began with the advent of regulations of the public airwaves in the United States at the dawn of the Age of Radio. Initially, radio, or wireless as it was more commonly called, was an open field of hobbyists and early inventors and experimenters, including Nikola Tesla, Lee De Forest, and Thomas Edison.
  • The Navy soon began complaining to a sympathetic press that amateurs were disrupting naval transmissions.
  • When Wilson declared war on Germany on April 6, 1917, he also issued an executive order closing most radio stations not needed by the US government. The Navy took it a step further and declared it was illegal to listen to radio or possess a receiver or transmitter in the US, but there were doubts they had the authority to issue such an order even in war time. The ban on radio was lifted in the US in late 1919.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • An entire federal agency, the Federal Communications Commission, was created eventually to enforce rules on call-signs, assigned frequencies, licensing and acceptable content for broadcast.
  • "Technological development, and in particular the miniaturization of transmitters and the fact that they can be put together by amateurs, 'encounters' a collective aspiration for some new means of expression." 
  • Despite pirate radio being known for over the air transmission, a new type of so called "pirate radio" stations now operate on-line.
  • The distinguishing feature is that these on-line pirates will usually not pay music copyright fees, like most of their AM/FM pirate cousins.
  •  ~ WE DO NOT CONDONE ILLEGAL PIRATE HF RADIO ACTIVITY ~  MUCH BETTER TO BE A LEGAL OPERATOR AND GET INTO  AMATEUR RADIO OR LEGAL FM BROADCASTING  YOU WILL FIND IT MUCH MORE SATISFYING  AND NOT HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT THE  FCC KNOCKING AT YOU DOOR
  • Fair UseThis site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
  •  
    Interesting history of the bootleg radios (Free Radio). Some logos are really cool, the second one looks like an RKO Radio Pictures but says "Free Radio" and has a hand of an individual holding the tower... In the end of the article there is a FAIR USE message that says: "This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.." Isn't that what we all want?  They also make sure that they "DO NOT CONDONE ILLEGAL PIRATE HF RADIO ACTIVITY": it's better to have a legal radio station than have  "FCC KNOCKING AT YOU DOOR."
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page