Group items tagged

This article discusses Microsoft's departure, for lack of potential business, from the digitization of books. He argues that Google's vast lead in this area will allow them to continue to dominate it with its competitors failing to find sufficient outside funding. The article concludes hoping for a joint funding by leading institutions like Harvard, Yale, and Princeton.

This online digital library, also called the "Million Book Collection," provides free online access to a searchable archive of digitized books. The website seeks to make digitally preserved and freely available "all the significant literary, artistic, and scientific works of mankind." This enormous undertaking is supported by Carnegie Mellon University and an extensive list of contributors from around the world.

This short statement at the beginning of San Marinos article Literature is not Data: Against Digital Humanities establishes the argument that BIG DATA IS INDEED COMING FOR OUR BOOKS. Marino believes that all Human endeavors have generated its own Monadic mass of data, and through these vast accumulations of ciphers the robots now endlessly scour for significance. He also believes that a smart book with a stupid title offers a fascinatingly general look at the new algorithmic culture. This culture is generated by a step by a step procedure for calculation and of times displayed through technological advancements. Marino ultimately argument is that literature is currently being took over by this "new" culture.

This article reports on the ruling by Harold Baer, Jr. which held that the HathiTrust's mass digitization is fair use. The judge explained in his opinion that the HDL's project is not only fair use in and of itself, but that its potential for text mining and the facilitation of access for print-disabled persons are transformative in nature, and can serve an entirely different purpose than the original works.