Hayabusa2 and the unfolding future of space exploration | Bryan Alexander - 0 views
bryanalexander.org/...ng-future-of-space-exploration
future futurism bryanalexander space technology politics economy US USA China Japan Russia Europe geopolitics
![](/images/link.gif)
-
What might this tell us about the future? Let’s consider Ryugu as a datapoint or story for where space exploration might head next.
-
robots continue to be cheap, far easier to operate, capable of enduring awful stresses, and happy to send gorgeous data back our way
-
Hayabusa is a Japanese project, not an American one, and national interest counts for a lot. No humans were involved, so human interest and story are absent. Perhaps the whole project looks too science-y for a culture that spins into post-truthiness, contains some serious anti-science and anti-technology strands, or just finds science stories too dry. Or maybe the American media outlets think Americans just aren’t that into space in particular in 2018.
- ...13 more annotations...
-
Hayabusa2 reminds us that space exploration is more multinational and more disaggregated than ever. Besides JAXA there are space programs being build up by China and India, including robot craft, astronauts (taikonauts, for China, vyomanauts, for India), and space stations. The Indian Mars Orbiter still circles the fourth planet. The European Space Agency continues to develop satellites and launch rockets, like the JUICE (JUpiter ICy moons Explorer). Russia is doing some mixture of commercial spaceflight, ISS maintenance, exploration, and geopoliticking. For these nations space exploration holds out a mixture of prestige, scientific and engineering development, and possible commercial return.
-
Bezos, Musk, and others live out a Robert Heinlein story by building up their own personal space efforts. This is, among other things, a sign of how far American wealth has grown, and how much of the elite are connected to technical skills (as opposed to inherited wealth). It’s an effect of plutocracy, as I’ve said before. Yuri Milner might lead the first interstellar mission with his Breakthrough Starshot plan.
-
Uneven development is also likely, as different programs struggle to master different stations in the space path. China may assemble a space station while Japan bypasses orbital platforms for the moon, private cubesats head into the deep solar system and private companies keep honing their Earth orbital launch skills.
-
Surely the challenges of getting humans and robots further into space will elicit interesting projects that can be used Earthside. Think about health breakthroughs needed to keep humans alive in environments scoured by radiation, or AI to guide robots through complex situations.
-
There isn’t a lot of press coverage beyond Japan (ah, once again I wish I read Japanese), if I go by Google News headlines. There’s nothing on the CNN.com homepage now, other than typical spatters of dread and celebrity; the closest I can find is a link to a story about Musk’s space tourism project, which a Japanese billionaire will ride. Nothing on Fox News or MSNBC’s main pages. BBC News at least has a link halfway down its main page.
-
Japan seems committed to creating a lunar colony. Musk and Bezos burn with the old science fiction and NASA hunger for shipping humans into the great dark. The lure of Mars seems to be a powerful one, and a multinational, private versus public race could seize the popular imagination. Older people may experience a rush of nostalgia for the glorious space race of their youth.
-
This competition could turn malign, of course. Recall that the 20th century’s space races grew out of warfare, and included many plans for combat and destruction. Nayef Al-Rodhan hints at possible strains in international cooperation: The possible fragmentation of outer space research activities in the post-ISS period would constitute a break-up of an international alliance that has fostered unprecedented cooperation between engineers and scientists from rival geopolitical powers – aside from China. The ISS represents perhaps the pinnacle of post-Cold War cooperation and has allowed for the sharing and streamlining of work methods and differing norms. In a current period of tense relations, it is worrying that the US and Russia may be ending an important phase of cooperation.
-
Space could easily become the ground for geopolitical struggles once more, and possibly a flashpoint as well. Nationalism, neonationalism, nativism could power such stresses
-
Enough of an off-Earth settlement could lead to further forays, once we bypass the terrible problem of getting off the planet’s surface, and if we can develop new ways to fuel and sustain craft in space. The desire to connect with that domain might help spur the kind of space elevator which will ease Earth-to-orbit challenges.
-
The 1960s space race saw the emergence of a kind of astronaut cult. The Soviet space program’s Russian roots included a mystical tradition. We could see a combination of nostalgia from older folks and can-do optimism from younger people, along with further growth in STEM careers and interest. Dialectically we should expect the opposite. A look back at the US-USSR space race shows criticism and opposition ranging from the arts (Gil Scott-Heron’s “Whitey on the Moon”, Jello Biafra’s “Why I’m Glad the Space Shuttle Blew Up”) to opinion polls (in the US NASA only won real support for the year around Apollo 11, apparently). We can imagine all kinds of political opposition to a 21st century space race, from people repeating the old Earth versus space spending canard to nationalistic statements (“Let Japan land on Deimos. We have enough to worry about here in Chicago”) to environmental concerns to religious ones. Concerns about vast wealth and inequality could well target space.
-
How will we respond when, say, twenty space tourists crash into a lunar crater and die, in agony, on YouTube?
-
That’s a lot to hang on one Japanese probe landing two tiny ‘bots on an asteroid in 2018, I know. But Hayabusa2 is such a signal event that it becomes a fine story to think through.