Skip to main content

Home/ Dream Realizations Math Stats/ Group items tagged facts

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rebecca Patterson

How to Fix Our Math Education - 0 views

  • The truth is that different sets of math skills are useful for different careers, and our math education should be changed to reflect this fact.
  • The truth is that different sets of math skills are useful for different careers, and our math education should be changed to reflect this fact.
  • The truth is that different sets of math skills are useful for different careers, and our math education should be changed to reflect this fact.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • This highly abstract curriculum is simply not the best way to prepare a vast majority of high school students for life.
  • most citizens would be better served by studying how mortgages are priced, how computers are programmed and how the statistical results of a medical trial are to be understood.
  • there is a world of difference between teaching “pure” math, with no context, and teaching relevant problems that will lead students to appreciate how a mathematical formula models and clarifies real-world situations.
  •  
    "The truth is that different sets of math skills are useful for different careers, and our math education should be changed to reflect this fact. "
Rebecca Patterson

Back-to-school facts: $7 billion-plus in shopping and everything else - The Answer Shee... - 0 views

  • Back-to-school facts: $7 billion-plus in shopping and everything else
  •  
    These are some very interesting statistics with links. Could use this with the data collection tool previously mentioned.
Rebecca Patterson

Does not compute: court says only hard math is patentable - 0 views

  • the court ruled that you can't patent mental processes—even if they are carried out by a computer program.
  • no-patenting-math rule doesn't apply if the math in question complicated enough that "as a practical matter, the use of a computer is required" to perform the calculations.
  • So you can't patent calculations that could be done with a pencil and paper. And such calculations remain unpatentable even if the steps are encoded in a machine-readable format. But this leads to an obvious question: why is software patentable at all? All software consists of sequences of calculations that could, in principle, be done with a pencil and paper.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Theoretically, you could have performed the calculations with a pencil and paper, but no one actually did so. Yet the Supreme Court still held them to be unpatentable mental processes.
  • The Federal Circuit displays a similar confusion about a more recent case, this one involving an algorithm for digital image half-toning. The court upheld the patent despite the fact that mathematical formulas were "admittedly a significant part" of the patent's claims. In Tuesday's opinion, the court argued that the half-toning patent was different from the fraud-detection patent because the half-toning algorithm "required the manipulation of computer data structures (e.g. the pixels of a digital image and a two-dimensional array known as a mask)."
  • Of course, a "computer data structure" is just a way of organizing numbers and symbols. When I served as a teacher's assistant (TA) for computer science courses in grad school, I would regularly draw diagrams of data structures on the whiteboard and perform example calculations on them. Similarly, many branches of math involve manipulating "data structures" like ordered pairs and matrices—presumably the Federal Circuit doesn't think you can patent new results in linear algebra because "data structures" are involved.
  •  
    Not quite math stats here, but interesting patent ruling trends. Worth a read, Cooper!!
Rebecca Patterson

Harvard Education Letter - 0 views

  • While most Waldorf schools are elementaries, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation helped launch the first public Waldorf high school four years ago at the George Washington Carver School of Arts and Science in Sacramento, Calif., replacing a failed America’s Choice program in the building. Test scores have since risen dramatically: In 2008, 67 percent of 11th-graders scored “far below basic” or “below basic” in English; in 2011, just 12 percent did. Teachers are happier as well, says principal Allegra Allesandri. While many teachers spent the summer boning up on content, Allesandri’s teachers also honed skills in bookbinding, painting, and felting. Many Carver faculty gatherings include singing in harmony and playing games. “Those skills, which might be about singing, are also about working together successfully,” she says.
  • For example, at the Woodland Star Charter School in Sonoma County, Calif., test scores for 2010 show a stunning 81 percent of the second-graders scoring “below basic” or “far below basic,” compared with 32 percent of district peers. By eighth grade, however, none of the school’s students score in that level (in fact 89 percent are “proficient” or “advanced”), while 19 percent of district peers score in the lowest two levels and just 56 percent in the top two levels. Results have been less dramatic at some Waldorf-inspired charters, whose students in upper grades have scored about the same as district peers.
  • They still do project-based activities, start class with a verse perhaps by Albert Einstein, and end by thanking the teacher. But Bishop says the texts and 40-minute daily math lessons “look more like public school.”
  •  
    Interesting article...wasn't Deborah in contact with these schools?
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page