Skip to main content

Home/ Dogs-to-Stars Enterprises/ Group items tagged method

Rss Feed Group items tagged

dhtobey Tobey

Custom Time Management Training Online - Priacta - 0 views

  •  
    Total, Relaxed Organization Online Training puts you in control of your time with precise, step-by-step instructions-then it follows up until your new habits are comfortable and effective. And there's no guesswork-it's customized for your favorite PDA, task list, calendar, and email client! Interesting example for integrating mobile learning, method delivery, and expert access.
Steve King

Process Improvement consulting services from Shaw Resources - 0 views

  • A methodical approach exists based on the Shaw patented method - Customer-Inspired Process Deployment®. The methodology starts with how an external customer experiences your organization and creates the structure of your organization as an assemblage of processes. This approach will most likely look quite different than your traditional organization chart. In fact, the organization chart really has little to do with how work gets done, in most cases. 
Steve King

Umberto - know the flow / Material Flow Networks - The Method - 0 views

shared by Steve King on 02 Jul 10 - Cached
  • Complex loops refeeding material or recycling loops can be displayed and calculated within the material flow networks.
  •  
    Umberto is expensive but seems to be successful at modeling complex energy and materials flows.. includes library of process patterns with metrics and math for each
Steve King

Summary - 1 views

  • CHAPTER 4 FRAMEWORK FOR SCADA UTILITY SURVIVABILITY MODELING * 4.1 Risk Modeling * 4.2 Internet Survey * 4.3 Survivability * 4.4 Taxonomy for Assessing Computer Security * 4.5 Definitions and Terms for a Taxonomy * 4.6 Understanding the Taxonomy * 4.7 Hierarchical Holographic Modeling (HHM) * 4.8 Recent Uses of the HHM in Identifying Risks * 4.9 Risk Modeling Using HHM * 4.10 Goal Development and Indices of Performance * 4.11 Event Tree and Fault Tree Analysis * 4.12 Distributions from Event Tree Analysis * 4.13 Partitioned Multiobjective Risk Method * 4.14 Multiobjective Tradeoff Analysis * 4.15 Evaluation *
dhtobey Tobey

HSI Journal of Homeland Security - 2 views

  • Generic training that can aid in dealing with unanticipated complex terrorist activities is needed. Terrorist acts can create stressful situations involving volatility, uncertainty, complexity, ambiguity, and delayed feedback and information flow (“VUCAD”). Strategic management simulation technology, based on complexity theory, can be used to assess and train personnel who must deal with the threat of terrorism.
  • Yet we also need more generic training to handle the VUCAD of terrorism
  • A more applicable technology is known as “quasi-experimental simulation.”17 While the quasi-experimental approach is a compromise between the free and experimental simulation methods, it tends to combine the advantages of both and mostly eliminates the disadvantages of the other two. In a quasi-experimental simulation, preprogrammed information is restricted to only part of the information: incoming messages that assure that all participants experience the same flow of events. On the other hand, many additional computer-generated responses (typically one-half of the incoming information) to participant actions allow realism (and maintenance of high motivation levels). Yet, because of the constant flow of pre-programmed information that keeps significant events and timing constant for all participants, performance can be numerically scored against established criteria of excellence or can be compared between different participants (or participating teams). The observer (who was necessary in the free simulation) has become obsolete. Performance is computer scored, both in terms of how any participant processes information (for example, is strategy developed?) and in terms of the appropriateness of the actions taken to deal with scenario-generated events
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • The strategic management simulation allows for the assessment (and training) of contextual content knowledge, but—more significantly—it permits the analysis and training or teaching of thought and action processes.
  • Process analysis and training are based on complexity theory.21, 22, 23 While complexity theory recognizes the importance of thought and action content (that is, what people do and think), it places major emphasis on the more generic thought and action process (that is, how people think and act). The “how” of thought and action applies to multiple facets of experience—that is, potentially transfers from one thought and action content area to another. Measurement and training of the “how” of thought and action allow for the application of the complexity-based strategic management simulation technology to the VUCAD of terrorism.
dhtobey Tobey

Evidence-based medicine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 1 views

  • The systematic review of published research studies is a major method used for evaluating particular treatments. The Cochrane Collaboration is one of the best-known, respected examples of systematic reviews. Like other collections of systematic reviews, it requires authors to provide a detailed and repeatable plan of their literature search and evaluations of the evidence. Once all the best evidence is assessed, treatment is categoried as "likely to be beneficial", "likely to be harmful", or "evidence did not support either benefit or harm".
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      We need to find access to the Cochrane Collaboration -- this is obviously a large, extant community socializing the vetting of clinical evidence.  We should find out more about their methodology and supporting technology, if any.
  • Evidence-based medicine categorizes different types of clinical evidence and ranks them according to the strength of their freedom from the various biases that beset medical research. For example, the strongest evidence for therapeutic interventions is provided by systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving a homogeneous patient population and medical condition. In contrast, patient testimonials, case reports, and even expert opinion have little value as proof because of the placebo effect, the biases inherent in observation and reporting of cases, difficulties in ascertaining who is an expert, and more.
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      Is this ranking an emergent process supported by some type of knowledge exchange platform? What about consensus/dissensus analysis? Seems ripe for groupthink and manipulation or paradigm traps.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • This process can be very human-centered, as in a journal club, or highly technical, using computer programs and information techniques such as data mining.
  • Level III: Opinions of respected authorities, based on clinical experience, descriptive studies, or reports of expert committees.
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      Need for LivingSurvey, LivingPapers, and LivingAnalysis.
  • Despite the differences between systems, the purposes are the same: to guide users of clinical research information about which studies are likely to be most valid. However, the individual studies still require careful critical appraisal.
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      In other words, there are wide differences of opinion (dissensus) that must be managed and used to inform decision-making.
  • The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force uses:[9] Level A: Good scientific evidence suggests that the benefits of the clinical service substantially outweighs the potential risks. Clinicians should discuss the service with eligible patients. Level B: At least fair scientific evidence suggests that the benefits of the clinical service outweighs the potential risks. Clinicians should discuss the service with eligible patients. Level C: At least fair scientific evidence suggests that there are benefits provided by the clinical service, but the balance between benefits and risks are too close for making general recommendations. Clinicians need not offer it unless there are individual considerations. Level D: At least fair scientific evidence suggests that the risks of the clinical service outweighs potential benefits. Clinicians should not routinely offer the service to asymptomatic patients. Level I: Scientific evidence is lacking, of poor quality, or conflicting, such that the risk versus benefit balance cannot be assessed. Clinicians should help patients understand the uncertainty surrounding the clinical service.
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      Relates well to Scott's idea of common problem being one of risk management.
  • AUC-ROC The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) reflects the relationship between sensitivity and specificity for a given test. High-quality tests will have an AUC-ROC approaching 1, and high-quality publications about clinical tests will provide information about the AUC-ROC. Cutoff values for positive and negative tests can influence specificity and sensitivity, but they do not affect AUC-ROC.
    • dhtobey Tobey
       
      ROC curves are similar to PPT, though addressing a different and less impactful issue of system sensitivity and specificity, rather than reliability (consistency) as determined by PPT.
Scott Edelman

CMMI | Tools & Methods | Appraisal Program | CMMI Appraisals - 0 views

  • CMMI Appraisals  The Appraisal Program oversees the quality and consistency of the SEI's process appraisal technology and encourages its effective use. Its four main functions include communications to the appraisal community; appraisal quality control; training, authorizing, certifying, and providing resources for Lead Appraisers and Team Leaders; and monitoring and reporting appraisal results.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page