Skip to main content

Home/ Document Wars/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Jesper Lund Stocholm

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Jesper Lund Stocholm

Jesper Lund Stocholm

[odf-discuss] ODF tools and US administration's Open Government - 1 views

  • Prepending "really" to "open standard" in context is simply preposterous.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      So true ...
  •  
    "Prepending "really" to "open standard" in context is simply preposterous. "
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Microsoft Office 2010 Engineering : Open XML: One Year In - 1 views

  • What is noteworthy about this investment is that we’re working closely with members of JTC 1 SC 34 ( the standards body responsible with Open XML maintenance ) to identify and resolve backward compatibility issues related to this new functionality.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      I think it is worth noting, that quite a few of the independant experts of WG4 have argued against usage of ISO-dates in T.
Jesper Lund Stocholm

IBM Lotus Symphony - Buzz: Lotus Symphony 1.3 is HERE - 0 views

    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      Hmmm ... I wonder how much of OOXML they have implemented - 10% ?
Jesper Lund Stocholm

An Antic Disposition: Protocols, Formats and the Limits of Disclosure - 2 views

  • However, from an interoperability perspective, MCE doesn't cut it. MCE is really just hand waving and pixie dust.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      That is absolutely correct - MCE is not an interop tool or panacea - it is a compatibility-tool.
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Groklaw - Digging for Truth - 6 views

  • You harmed us and our families. You harmed the public, and you will have to live with that judgment from us.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      Legendary comment ... :o) "You harmed our families. You harmed the public and you will have to live with that judgement from us"
Jesper Lund Stocholm

How Microsoft/ISO Took More Control of ODF | Boycott Novell - 0 views

  • Maybe it is already available somewhere, but we failed to find it.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      So Roy, are you gonna corect your intentionally misleading comments now that you have been made aware of it? http://twitter.com/jlundstocholm/status/4129606438
Jesper Lund Stocholm

OOXML leap-year bug unfix (Norbert Bollow's Comments on Standards) - 0 views

  • The precise proposed addition to the text of ISO/IEC 29500-4 is: §10.7, "Additional representation for dates and times (Part 1, Section 18.17.4 )" For a document of a transitional conformance class, each unique instant in SpreadsheetML time shall be stored as an ISO 8601-formatted string or as a serial value. This would override, for files of the "transitional" conformance type, the statements in Section 18.17.4 which allow only the ISO 8601 date format.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      This is amazing ... is there no end to the stupidity? also ... what happened to the "web2.0-ish" way of enabling your readers to comment? This reminds me of when Bob Sutor disabled comments on his pieces on OOXML.
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Doug Mahugh - 0 views

  • An implementation is permitted to provide an implicit conversion from string-constant to number. However, the rules by which such conversions take place are implementation-defined. [Example: An implementation might choose to accept "123"+10 by converting the string "123" to the number 123. Such conversions might be locale-specific in that a string-constant such as "10,56" might be converted to 10.56 in some locales, but not in others, depending on the radix point character. end example]
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      So in other words, OOXML doesn't say anything about string conversion either.
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Groklaw - Digging for Truth - 0 views

  • I would agree with you that ODF is better that OOXML.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      I simply love statements like these ... :o)
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Groklaw - When Would You Use OOXML and When ODF? -- What is OOXML For? - 0 views

  • Whoa, whoa, whoa! - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 01 2009 @ 02:21 AM EDT
  • Whoa, whoa, whoa! - Authored by: Anonymous on Friday, May 01 2009 @ 03:17 AM EDT
Jesper Lund Stocholm

The EU fight against yuck ePatents (Lessig Blog) - 0 views

  • If people had understood how patents would be granted when most of today�s ideas were invented and had taken out patents, the industry would be at a complete stand-still today. The solution . . . is patent exchanges . . . and patenting as much as we can. . . . A future start-up with no patents of its own will be forced to pay whatever price the giants choose to impose. That price might be high: Established companies have an interest in excluding future competitors." Fred Warshofsky, The Patent Wars 170-71 (NY: Wiley 1994).
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      A quick thought: Did Bill say that patents were bad?
Jesper Lund Stocholm

ECIS zdokumentovalo monopolní chování MS - 0 views

  • Řekněme, že jsem to špatně pojmenoval, ale je to totéž o čem mluvíte Vy. Pokud se podíváte např. na http://idippedut.dk/post/2008/01/Embrace-and-extend---SVG-revisited.aspx, tak možná o celé situaci pochopíte víc, než z nějakého příspěvku, který jste silně vytrhnul z kontextu.
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      I always find it amusing when I am quoted in languages I do not understand a single word of. :o)
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Front-page: What is the definition of an "existing document"? - 0 views

  • Can you provide a definition of what an "existing documents" means?
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      "Existing documents" refer to both binary Microsoft Office documents as well as ECMA-376 1st Ed. documents.
Jesper Lund Stocholm

Groklaw - Digging for Truth : The problem with XML document formats - 0 views

  • The problem with that, as I understand it, is that the transitional spec is pretty much unimplementable by anybody except MS
    • Jesper Lund Stocholm
       
      Well, herein lies the problem, dude ... you don't understand it.
1 - 16 of 16
Showing 20 items per page