“Look at
Notre-Dame de Paris,”
he said. “The novel is not about the hunchback so much as it is about
the church, and the idea of sculpture as a way of communicating stories.
In the preliterate era they told the stories through these churches.…
Victor Hugo was lamenting the loss of that stone literacy, where people
would look up at the church and know what it was about. Yes, something
was lost. But we gained a lot. I remember a conversation I had at our
open source convention with Freeman Dyson, the physicist. He said
something wonderful; someone asked him what do you think about the fact
that we were losing something or other, and he said, ‘We have to forget,
otherwise there would be no room for new things.’ That’s an important
thing to take.… Be accepting of the losses and the gains.”
“Reading isn’t going to go away,” agreed Abram, “but it’s
only one aspect. Probably, it will be some combination of reading,
visual conversations, and lessons. What you’re authoring is contributing
to a corpus that is significantly larger than it is now, electronically.
Most of the important stuff will have been converted 20 years from now.
We can convert the entire Library of Congress for $9 billion right now,
which, in terms of national priorities, is only five weeks of Iraqi
conflict. It’s doable. It used to be
undoable. The corpus, the ability to create cultural context, is going
to change the nature of how culture is expressed.”