Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

Name brand companies are using 37signals tools. 

She placed her First and last name on the page, as well as the year published. 

She has job listings, and different tools for looking for employment.

The score for this article was an 81.2 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. No This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 8.6 i arrived at this by using 15 (total score) divided by 7 (number of questions) multiplied by 4 (number of criteria met) and rounded to the nearest tenth. i used this scoring system for all sections. Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 10 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. No The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 6.3 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Ye

I would rate thIs artIcle as 65 poor, the InformatIon Is not very consIstent , no copyrIght Info, no author,no cItatIons, all seems to be lackIng depth.  

1) Content - The content in this article is remarkably good. it seems fair and unbiased and is written as a serious post. it provides details on the facts and the mysterious circumstances surrounding the loss of this plane 2) Credibility - CNN by itself is a reliable source. But also they provide links to outside articles on the page to corroborate their posting of the story. 3) Critical Thinking - Based on the information in the article you can deduce a lot about the plane and the issues with the search. i helps you think by mentioning important details and providing links to search for more information. 4) Copyright - This page itself was copyrighted in 2014. This article itself was posted on Sun March 16th, 2014. Meaning that it was updated today. 5) Citation - This site cites its references and provides links to them for additional information. 6) Continuity - Because of CNN's informational network this site can be updated within hours if not minutes. This up to date information provides room for new information to enter the article. 7) Censorship - This is posted and maintained by CNN so there is most likely some degree of censorship. But the comments can be posted immediately. However, if your post is tagged as offensive they will remove it. 8) Connectivity - This site is vastly interconnected both with corresponding articles on CNN.com and outside articles. it's easy to use and Easy to navigate. 9) Comparability - This page can be compared to many other pages. in fact, this article is the center of many websites referencing its information for reposting. 10) - Context - The scope of this page in context is a little biased. it tries to hint at the fact that the plane could have been hijacked and focuses on that speculation only giving a slight reference that the Ministry of Transportation has said that they aren't pursuing it that way but are looking into all of the information on why it deviated. Web Page Evaluation: Cur

1) Content - The content in this article is remarkably good. it seems fair and unbiased and is written as a serious post. it provides details on the facts and the mysterious circumstances surrounding the loss of this plane 2) Credibility - CNN by itself is a reliable source. But also they provide links to outside articles on the page to corroborate their posting of the story. 3) Critical Thinking - Based on the information in the article you can deduce a lot about the plane and the issues with the search. i helps you think by mentioning important details and providing links to search for more information. 4) Copyright - This page itself was copyrighted in 2014. This article itself was posted on Sun March 16th, 2014. Meaning that it was updated today. 5) Citation - This site cites its references and provides links to them for additional information. 6) Continuity - Because of CNN's informational network this site can be updated within hours if not minutes. This up to date information provides room for new information to enter the article. 7) Censorship - This is posted and maintained by CNN so there is most likely some degree of censorship. But the comments can be posted immediately. However, if your post is tagged as offensive they will remove it. 8) Connectivity - This site is vastly interconnected both with corresponding articles on CNN.com and outside articles. it's easy to use and Easy to navigate. 9) Comparability - This page can be compared to many other pages. in fact, this article is the center of many websites referencing its information for reposting. 10) - Context - The scope of this page in context is a little biased. it tries to hint at the fact that the plane could have been hijacked and focuses on that speculation only giving a slight reference that the Ministry of Transportation has said that they aren't pursuing it that way but are looking into all of the information on why it deviated. Web Page Evaluation: Cur

She did it!

And the Sheriff knows it!

1, 2)Article contains content of a serious nature that directly relates to my research by a published author many time over for a website made for business management and up. 3)My previous knowledge from working in the tech field and using this to work from home allows me to see the validity of the information therein from personal experience. 4, 5)The author is posted next to the article for copyright, and the article contains original information from the author, so no citation needed. 6, 7)The site is continually updated (evidence from home page) and i do not believe that my search results that lead me here or this site is censored. 8)i verified this site is viewable on iE, Firefox and Chrome. 9)Comparability not important for project and not available. 10)Context is open ended for this project.

1,2)PDF from EBSCOhost containing content of a serious nature, authored by a writer for well known technology publication. 3)My previous knowledge from working in the tech field and using this to work from home allows me to see the validity of the information therein from personal experience. 4)Author is printer under the article title for copyright. 5)Citation used throughout article when outside information used. 6)EBSCOhost is continually updated with new articles 7)Being a school-provided resource, the results may be censored, but i do not believe it had an affect on my results. 8)i verified this site is viewable on iE, Firefox and Chrome. 9)Comparability not important for project and not available. 10)Context is open ended for this project.

Digital Tool - Twitter

Digital Tool - Photos