Skip to main content

Home/ Digital Literacy at Full Sail University/ Group items tagged linking.

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Reshunda Pickens

Lance's life: Travel, kids, golf handicap 'down to a 9' - 0 views

www.usatoday.com/...4509971

USAToday Lance Armstrong

shared by Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Reshunda Pickens
      Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
       
      The score for this article was an 88.7-Good, based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received:  Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes  The site has been updated recently. Yes  Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No  Total: 10  Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes  This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. N/A  The information on the topic is thorough. Yes  The information is accurate. Yes  The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes  The information is in good taste. Yes  The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes  Total: 15  Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. Yes  The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes  There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes  You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes  Total: 10  Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes  The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes  The links are easy to identify. Yes, there is an abundance of links referencing topics directly related to the article.  The links are logically grouped. Yes  The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes  There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes  The links are relevant to the subject. Yes  The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes  Total: 10  Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes  The page is worth the time. Yes  The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes  The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes  Total: 10  Mul
  • Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
     
    Lance Armstrong is the athlete who came out with the shocking news that he cheated for his Tour de France wins. This is the state of his life a year after. The score for this article was an 88.7-Good, based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. N/A The information on the topic is thorough. Yes The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 15 Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 10 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. Yes, there is an abundance of links referencing topics directly related to the article. The links are logically grouped. Yes The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. Yes The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 10 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time.
Cameron Browne

What is database? definition and meaning - 1 views

www.businessdictionary.com/...database.html

databases database definition DGL DGL Vocabulary Vocabulary research digital literacy

shared by Cameron Browne on 03 Dec 13 - No Cached
  • Systematically organized or structured repository of indexed information (usually as a group of linked data files) that allows easy retrieval, updating, analysis, and output of data.
  • this data could be in the form of graphics, reports, scripts, tables, text, etc., representing almost every kind of information.
Joey Martinez

Geotechnology - 0 views

www.whatdoesthatmean.com/...geotechnology.html

geotechnology

shared by Joey Martinez on 06 Apr 14 - No Cached
  • The application of the mineral arts and sciences to the improvement of old and development of new methods, techniques, processes, and products, as in ceramics, glassmaking, metallurgy, etc.
  • Joey Martinez on 06 Apr 14
     
    The application of the mineral arts and sciences to the improvement of old and development of new methods, techniques, processes, and products, as in ceramics, glassmaking, metallurgy, etc.
Reshunda Pickens

Obama to propose key changes in data collection program - NBC Politics - 0 views

nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/...ges-in-data-collection-program

NBC News Obama Administration Data Collection

shared by Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Reshunda Pickens
      Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
       
      The score for this article was an 76 -Average based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received:  Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes  The site has been updated recently. Yes  Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No  Total: 10  Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes  This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No  The information on the topic is thorough. No  The information is accurate. Yes  The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes  The information is in good taste. Yes  The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes  Total: 10.7  Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. Yes  The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No  There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No  You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes  Total: 5  Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes  The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes  The links are easy to identify. Yes, on the physical page there are hyperlinks provided that correspond to different topics relating to the article.  The links are logically grouped. Yes  The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes  There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes  The links are relevant to the subject. Yes  The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes  Total: 10  Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes  The page is worth the time. Yes  The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes  The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes  Total: 10 
  • Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
     
    The score for this article was an 76 -Average based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 10.7 Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 5 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. Yes, on the physical page there are hyperlinks provided that correspond to different topics relating to the article. The links are logically grouped. Yes The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. Yes The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 10 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes Total: 10 Multimedia (0 to 10 P
Cameron Browne

What is collaboration? definition and meaning - 0 views

www.businessdictionary.com/...collaboration.html

collaboration definition DGL DGL Vocabulary digital literacy research Vocabulary

shared by Cameron Browne on 03 Dec 13 - No Cached
  • General: Cooperative arrangement in which two or more parties (which may or may not have any previous relationship) work jointly towards a common goal.
anthony chaney

CCCCCCC.CCC (ten Cs) for evaluating Internet resources: EBSCOhost - 0 views

web.ebscohost.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...detail

10 c's

shared by anthony chaney on 03 Dec 13 - No Cached
  • anthony chaney on 03 Dec 13
     
    "Directions: Use your judgment in allotting points for the various categories. Total the points for score. Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. The site has been updated recently. Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. The information on the topic is thorough. The information is accurate. The purpose of the page is obvious. The information is in good taste. The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. The links are easy to identify. The links are logically grouped. The layout is consistent from page to page. There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. The links are relevant to the subject. The icons clearly represent what is intended. Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. The page is worth the time. The page's presentation is eye-catching. The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Multimedia (0 to 10 Points) Sound, graphics or video enhance the site's message. Treatment (0 to 10 Points) Any biases towards the subject matter can be easily identified. The page is free from stereotyping. The page is age appropriate for content and vocabulary for its intended audience. Access (0 to 5 Points) You can connect quickly to the page. The page is available through search engines. The page loads quickly. You can choose whether to download small
chris mackie

LexisNexis® Academic: Document - 0 views

www.lexisnexis.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...getDocCui

shared by chris mackie on 17 Mar 14 - No Cached
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Incredibly so. It not only had links to the web article but also links and information on the entire company. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Not directly but through links to the company's press releases. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. The time stamp on the article is March 12, 2014. It doesn't appear to be revised after that date. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Not really. This one is pretty good because it covers not only basic information about the company but also links to the content I was looking for directly. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. No but it does have the page it is from. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. Not for the person who wrote the article but the financial institution that it came from. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes from Reuters Knowledge Direct. 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. This site is often updated. In this case mostly in a timely fashion. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. It still isn't real time but it is pretty close. This article was uploaded just a couple days ago. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes. At least as it relates to the discussion of gay rights. This article has more information on the whole company. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. This article is factual instead of guiding towards a particular view. Because it focuses on the company as a whole and not the current debate it maintains its neutrality. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not within the scope of this article. Because this article just dic
  • March 12, 2014Heineken N.V. (ADR)Tweede Weteringplantsoen 21 AMSTERDAM 1017 ZD Netherlands
  • var myVar; function googleTranslateElementInit() { new google.translate.TranslateElement({ pageLanguage: 'auto' }, 'google_translate_element'); myVar=setInterval(function(){chkGoogle()},1000); } //Start: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil function chkGoogle(){ var obj = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(obj!=null && obj!=""){ clearInterval(myVar); showHideOriginal(); obj.onchange = function(){showHideOriginal();} } } function showHideOriginal(){ var googleTranslateLang = $('.goog-te-combo')[0].value; if(googleTranslateLang!=null && googleTranslateLang!=""){ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'block'; } else{ document.getElementById("showOrigBut").style.display = 'none'; } } //End: 4734642: SEC content seach causes screen to freeze: Nikhil Copyright 2014 Thomson Financial, All Rights Reserved Reuters Knowledge Direct
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • TELEPHONE: Main Phone: 31-20-5239239, Contact Phone: 31-312-5239590 FAX: 31-20-6622640 URL: Home Page: http://www.theheinekencompany.com E-MAIL: investors@heineken.com OTHER URL:News Releases: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/media/media-releasesInvestor Relations: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investorsFinancial Information: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/reports-and-presentations?tab=financialsCorporate History/Profile: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/about-us/company-strategyExecutives: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/investors/governance/executive-boardProducts/Services: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/brandsEmployment Opportunities: http://www.theheinekencompany.com/careers
  • LOAD-DATE: March 12, 2014
  • Source [Reuters Knowledge Direct]
chris mackie

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 search grows, pilots face scrutiny - CNN.com - 0 views

www.cnn.com/...index.html

shared by chris mackie on 17 Mar 14 - No Cached
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content - The content in this article is remarkably good. It seems fair and unbiased and is written as a serious post. It provides details on the facts and the mysterious circumstances surrounding the loss of this plane 2) Credibility - CNN by itself is a reliable source. But also they provide links to outside articles on the page to corroborate their posting of the story. 3) Critical Thinking - Based on the information in the article you can deduce a lot about the plane and the issues with the search. I helps you think by mentioning important details and providing links to search for more information. 4) Copyright - This page itself was copyrighted in 2014. This article itself was posted on Sun March 16th, 2014. Meaning that it was updated today. 5) Citation - This site cites its references and provides links to them for additional information. 6) Continuity - Because of CNN's informational network this site can be updated within hours if not minutes. This up to date information provides room for new information to enter the article. 7) Censorship - This is posted and maintained by CNN so there is most likely some degree of censorship. But the comments can be posted immediately. However, if your post is tagged as offensive they will remove it. 8) Connectivity - This site is vastly interconnected both with corresponding articles on CNN.com and outside articles. It's easy to use and Easy to navigate. 9) Comparability - This page can be compared to many other pages. In fact, this article is the center of many websites referencing its information for reposting. 10) - Context - The scope of this page in context is a little biased. It tries to hint at the fact that the plane could have been hijacked and focuses on that speculation only giving a slight reference that the Ministry of Transportation has said that they aren't pursuing it that way but are looking into all of the information on why it deviated. Web Page Evaluation: Cur
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content - The content in this article is remarkably good. It seems fair and unbiased and is written as a serious post. It provides details on the facts and the mysterious circumstances surrounding the loss of this plane 2) Credibility - CNN by itself is a reliable source. But also they provide links to outside articles on the page to corroborate their posting of the story. 3) Critical Thinking - Based on the information in the article you can deduce a lot about the plane and the issues with the search. I helps you think by mentioning important details and providing links to search for more information. 4) Copyright - This page itself was copyrighted in 2014. This article itself was posted on Sun March 16th, 2014. Meaning that it was updated today. 5) Citation - This site cites its references and provides links to them for additional information. 6) Continuity - Because of CNN's informational network this site can be updated within hours if not minutes. This up to date information provides room for new information to enter the article. 7) Censorship - This is posted and maintained by CNN so there is most likely some degree of censorship. But the comments can be posted immediately. However, if your post is tagged as offensive they will remove it. 8) Connectivity - This site is vastly interconnected both with corresponding articles on CNN.com and outside articles. It's easy to use and Easy to navigate. 9) Comparability - This page can be compared to many other pages. In fact, this article is the center of many websites referencing its information for reposting. 10) - Context - The scope of this page in context is a little biased. It tries to hint at the fact that the plane could have been hijacked and focuses on that speculation only giving a slight reference that the Ministry of Transportation has said that they aren't pursuing it that way but are looking into all of the information on why it deviated. Web Page Evaluation: Cur
Reshunda Pickens

This Is How You Make Millions Off Your Grandma's Brownie Recipe - 0 views

www.huffingtonpost.com/...setto-thinkthin_n_4598119.html

Huffington Post thinkThin

shared by Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Reshunda Pickens
      Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
       
      The score for this article was an 81.2 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. No This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 8.6 I arrived at this by using 15 (total score) divided by 7 (number of questions) multiplied by 4 (number of criteria met) and rounded to the nearest tenth. I used this scoring system for all sections. Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. Yes You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 10 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. No The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 6.3 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Ye
  • Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
     
    This article is by Lauren Betesh and describes the success and motivations behind the company thinkThin. The CEO of thinkThin is Lizanne Falsetto. She turned a family recipe into a multimillion dollar company. This article includes a video interview that is a great digital resource. The interview is available right on the article page to view immediately.
Reshunda Pickens

Judge Disallows Plan by Detroit to Pay Off Banks - NYTimes.com - 0 views

dealbook.nytimes.com/...ts-deal-to-exit-swap-contracts

shared by Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Reshunda Pickens
      Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
       
      The score for this article was an 82 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points) The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points) The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. Yes. This article is useful to me because I am originally from the city of Detroit and plan to use my career success as a resource to help promote change in my hometown. This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. Yes The purpose of the page is obvious. Yes The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 10.7 Authority (0 to 10 Points) The authors are clearly identified. Yes The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. Yes There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Yes Total: 7.5 Navigation (0 to 10 Points) You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. Yes The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. Yes The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. Yes There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. Yes Total: 7.5 Experience (0 to 10 Points) The page fulfills its intended purpose. Yes The page is worth the time. Yes The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Yes Total: 10 Multimedia (0 to 10
Reshunda Pickens

Defense in Hariri case: Prosecutor has no evidence - The Washington Post - 0 views

www.washingtonpost.com/...3-97d3-b9925ce2c57b_story.html

shared by Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14 - No Cached
    • Reshunda Pickens
      Reshunda Pickens on 30 Jan 14
       
      The score for this article was a 42.2 based off of the criteria provided in the article "Ten C's for evaluating internet resources" by Richmond, Betsy; Everhart, Nancy; Auer, Nicole J. This is why this score was received: Currency (0 to 15 Points)  The site has the date of last revision posted. Yes The site has been updated recently. Yes Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. No Total: 10 Content (0 to 15 Points)  The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. No This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. No The information on the topic is thorough. No The information is accurate. No The purpose of the page is obvious. No The information is in good taste. Yes The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Yes Total: 4.3 Authority (0 to 10 Points)  The authors are clearly identified. No The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. No There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. No You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. No Total: 0 Navigation (0 to 10 Points)  You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. No The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. Yes The links are easy to identify. No The links are logically grouped. No The layout is consistent from page to page. No There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. Yes The links are relevant to the subject. No The icons clearly represent what is intended. No Total: 2.5 Experience (0 to 10 Points)  The page fulfills its intended purpose. No The page is worth the time. No The page's presentation is eye-catching. Yes The site engages the visitor to spend time there. No Total: 2.5 Multimedia (0 to 10 Points)  Sound, graphics or video enhance the site's message. No Total: 0 Treatment (0 to 10 Points)  Any biases towards the subject matter can be easily identified. No
chris mackie

Westboro Baptist Church founder Fred Phelps Sr. 'on the edge of death' - NY Daily News - 0 views

www.nydailynews.com/...rtedly-death-article-1.1723451

shared by chris mackie on 16 Mar 14 - No Cached
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 16 Mar 14
       
      1) Content - The intent of the content was to demonstrate the encroaching illness of Rev Fred Phelps. 2) Credibility - This seems to be a fairly credible source as the write (Doyle Murphy) also writes for the New York Daily News. 3) Critical Thinking - I am familiar with Rev Fred Phelps SR. from watching the protests of his church group on the internet. That being said, I have also seen numerous false death reports. Because of his (and his organization') reputation it is possible that someone is lying to create disbelief. 4) Copyright - The site itself was copyrighted in 2013, but this article itself was uploaded Sunday, March 16, 2014, 1:53 PM 5) Citation - This article includes citations from where it received the information and pictures. They also provide links in the article to easily access the original text. 6) Continuity - This article can be updated but only by the site admins itself. That means that it most likely has the most accurate information. 7) Censorship - This article appears completely uncensored. It includes some graphic language and images. Because of these points I can deduce that the facts are not altered. Also there is a moderated comments section but those posts appear uncensored 8) Connectivity - The site was easy to find and navigate to. It can handle multiple users at a time without issue. It contains links to the other parts of the page depending on if you want to continue reading on a different topic. 9) Comparability - I checked a couple different websites to see if they had a similar article. And they do. By checking other sites I can confirm that this is most likely a fact. 10) - Context - The context in this article tries very hard to just be neutral and factual about a man with such a horrible reputation. It does so decently, but the comments at the bottom do not. They are as inflammatory as some of the protest signs Fred Phelps is commonly known for. Web Page Evaluation: Currency - 10, Content
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content - The intent of the content was to demonstrate the encroaching illness of Rev Fred Phelps. 2) Credibility - This seems to be a fairly credible source as the write (Doyle Murphy) also writes for the New York Daily News. 3) Critical Thinking - I am familiar with Rev Fred Phelps SR. from watching the protests of his church group on the internet. That being said, I have also seen numerous false death reports. Because of his (and his organization') reputation it is possible that someone is lying to create disbelief. 4) Copyright - The site itself was copyrighted in 2013, but this article itself was uploaded Sunday, March 16, 2014, 1:53 PM 5) Citation - This article includes citations from where it received the information and pictures. They also provide links in the article to easily access the original text. 6) Continuity - This article can be updated but only by the site admins itself. That means that it most likely has the most accurate information. 7) Censorship - This article appears completely uncensored. It includes some graphic language and images. Because of these points I can deduce that the facts are not altered. Also there is a moderated comments section but those posts appear uncensored 8) Connectivity - The site was easy to find and navigate to. It can handle multiple users at a time without issue. It contains links to the other parts of the page depending on if you want to continue reading on a different topic. 9) Comparability - I checked a couple different websites to see if they had a similar article. And they do. By checking other sites I can confirm that this is most likely a fact. 10) - Context - The context in this article tries very hard to just be neutral and factual about a man with such a horrible reputation. It does so decently, but the comments at the bottom do not. They are as inflammatory as some of the protest signs Fred Phelps is commonly known for. Web Page Evaluation: Currency - 10, Content
David Bell

EBSCOhost: Scholarly Knowledge Development and Dissemination in an International Conte... - 0 views

web.ebscohost.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...detail

shared by David Bell on 25 Jul 13 - No Cached
    • David Bell
      David Bell on 25 Jul 13
       
      WEB PAGE EVALUATION Currency: 15 The site has the date of last revision posted. The site has been updated recently. Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. Content: 15 The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. The information on the topic is thorough. The information is accurate. The purpose of the page is obvious. The information is in good taste. The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Authority: 10 The authors are clearly identified. The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Navigation: 7 You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. The links are easy to identify. The links are logically grouped. The layout is consistent from page to page. There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. The links are relevant to the subject. The icons clearly represent what is intended. Experience: 10 The page fulfills its intended purpose. The page is worth the time. The page's presentation is eye-catching. The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Multimedia 1 Sound, graphics or video enhance the site's message. Treatment: 10 Any biases towards the subject matter can be easily identified. The page is free from stereotyping. The page is age appropriate for content and vocabulary for its intended audience. Access 5 You can connect quickly to the page. The page is available through search engines. The page loads quickly. You can choose whether to download smaller images, text-only, or non-frame versions. Miscellaneous: 15 There are no per-use costs involved. Interactions asking for private information are secured. Information can be printed wi
David Bell

Web 2.0: A New Wave of Innovation for Teaching and Learning? (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAU... - 0 views

www.educause.edu/...novation-teaching-and-learning

web2.0 teaching innovation social tools learning

shared by David Bell on 24 Jul 13 - No Cached
    • David Bell
      David Bell on 24 Jul 13
       
      WEB PAGE EVALUATION Currency: 15 The site has the date of last revision posted. The site has been updated recently. Frequency of planned updates and revisions is stated. Content: 15 The information will be useful to our curriculum and/or student interest. This information is not available in any other format elsewhere in my library. The information on the topic is thorough. The information is accurate. The purpose of the page is obvious. The information is in good taste. The page uses correct spelling and grammar. Authority: 10 The authors are clearly identified. The authors and/or maintainers of the site are authorities in their field. There is a way to contact the author (s) via e-mail or traditional mail. You can easily tell from the domain name where the page originates. Navigation: 10 You can tell from the first page how the site is organized and what options are available. The type styles and background make the page clear and readable. The links are easy to identify. The links are logically grouped. The layout is consistent from page to page. There is a link back to the home page on each supporting page. The links are relevant to the subject. The icons clearly represent what is intended. Experience: 10 The page fulfills its intended purpose. The page is worth the time. The page's presentation is eye-catching. The site engages the visitor to spend time there. Multimedia: 9 Sound, graphics or video enhance the site's message. Treatment: 10 Any biases towards the subject matter can be easily identified. The page is free from stereotyping. The page is age appropriate for content and vocabulary for its intended audience. Access: 5 You can connect quickly to the page. The page is available through search engines. The page loads quickly. You can choose whether to download smaller images, text-only, or non-frame versions. Miscellaneous: 15 There are no per-use costs involved. Interactions asking for private information are secured. Information can be printed
deborahnolan74

Shibboleth Authentication Request - 5 views

www.lexisnexis.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/...lnacademic

digital MEDIA collaboration boston

shared by deborahnolan74 on 14 Dec 13 - No Cached
DGL Diigo liked it
    • Jackie Davidson
      Jackie Davidson on 20 Jan 14
       
      Twitter shares up-this article gave more content and information.
    • Joshua Whitley
      Joshua Whitley on 16 Feb 14
       
      10 Currency-Not current, no updates, can be used in classroom setting 7 Content is credible. the story can be useful to students to educate. The information is valid.  8 Authority- Authors' names are at the top of article, no links to contact author, Authors' Occupation is visible 7 Navigation-No links relevant to topic. everything clear and readable,  10 Experience-Fulfills it's intended purpose.  very engaging to me.  0 Multimedia-no multimedia  7 Treatment- Bias toward Democrats,   6 Access-Easy to access page, no relevant links to help further investigate,    7 Miscellaneous-no per-use cost, no inquiring of private info, can be printed with no issues 
    • troy seaton
      troy seaton on 17 Mar 14
       
      WiTricity Corporation make devices that allows wireless charging.
  • WiTricity is also developing technology for wireless charging of electric vehicles and, later, for use in implanted medical devices like heart pumps, said Katie Hall, its chief technology officer.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • The technology is based on magnetic induction -- the process used to recharge electric toothbrushes. In the toothbrush, the base has a magnetic coil that generates a magnetic field. A second coil in the toothbrush captures some of that field, inducing an electric current.But electric toothbrushes transfer power only from the primary coil to the secondary one at very close range. Move the brush a short distance from the base, and it won't charge.
  • WiTricity has signed a technology transfer and licensing agreement with MediaTek, a semiconductor company in Taiwan, to collaborate on systems for wireless charging of mobile handsets, tablet computers, game controllers and other devices, Mr. Giler said.
    • troy seaton
      troy seaton on 17 Mar 14
       
      Other devices that are development
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. This article seems to be accurate and thorough. It's well written. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. This article answered basic questions on my topic but to the exact information I was looking for. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. September 26th, 2013 b. Is there information that could be updated? i. Yes there was, this article focused on more on Russian oil running low and how the Kremlin was looking towards Siberian shale to replenish it and not at all about the interactions of the US in that regard. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes. His name is Guy Chazan. b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. It originated in the Financial Times (London, England) 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. For the most part yes. It seems that it is often update but not current. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. No. It does update but not often enough to provide up-to-date information. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. Yes it does at least about the value of Russian oil. It doesn't contain anything about how people are reacting to the current foreign policy from President Obama. 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. No. It seems unbiased and direct in its point of view. It doesn't take either side, but still relates all the information properly. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. It didn't have any information on the actions or reaction of the US or the world.
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content and Credibility a. Is the article accurate & thorough i. Yes, very much so. It paints a positive image on the tragedy. b. Does it answer your questions about the topic i. Yes, it focuses on information about the plane and the information surrounding its disappearance. 2) Currency a. What is the date or timestamp of the article? Has it been revised? i. This Article was updated 03/16/2014. There is no record of it being altered or revised since upload. b. Is there information that could be updated? i. No. Because this article was uploaded and published today the information is current. 3) Authority and Credibility a. Is the author identified? i. Yes, Larry McShane b. Can we see their job title or description? i. No. But it is assumed that he is a reporter for the New York Daily News c. Can you see where the article originates? i. Yes. New York Daily News, Page 5 4) Continuity and Comparability a. Will the internet site be maintained and updated? i. Yes. This site is updated often to maintain the most accurate information. b. Can you rely on this source over time to provide up-to-date information? i. Yes. It may not be bleeding edge down to the second up to date, but it is at best only a few hours old. c. Does the internet site contain complete information as found in the comparable article? i. No. Not in the article itself. It does provide options to search for additional articles and provides a way to narrow your search 5) Biases and Censorship a. Does that article seem biased in any way in its point of view? i. Yes, but not in a bad way. It was about how hope hasn't been lost in the search for the plane. b. Is there information included or not included that is found in the comparable article? i. Not currently. Because of how new the article is there isn't really any more information on it. If it included all the information available it would be come hard to read.
  • Ken Lehman on 14 Jan 14
     
    AFP - RELAXNEWS (English International Version) Two film stars, Michael Douglas and Paul Rudd, are to share the title role in the next film from "The World's End" director Edgar Wright, due 2015. After Robert Redford's stint in "Captain America: The Winter Soldier," Marvel has recruited another legendary actor for an upcoming blockbuster in Michael Douglas. The 69-year-old will become the face of Henry Pym and hand over the Ant-Man moniker to Scott Lang, the new hero played by Paul Rudd. Ant-Man first appeared in print in 1962 and has become the alter ego for a number of Marvel characters; the film sees Lang succeed Pym as the electronics whizz in charge of wearing the Ant-Man mantle, able to shrink, grow, and communicate with insects. Dated for July 31, 2015, "Ant-Man" should also result in the character's addition to the supporting cast of the next Avengers film, set for mid-2018.
  • Joey Martinez on 13 Apr 14
     
    Adknowledge is a leading digital marketing company working with some of the worldâs top brands. Adknowledge designs, manages and measures campaigns for companies including Audi, Starbucks, LG, Disney and LâOréal to unlock digital audiences using multiple channels: social media, mobile, apps, email, display ads and audience engagement. A proprietary database of more than 600 million internet and mobile users steers Adknowledgeâs targeting; user preferences, online behavior and unsurpassed optimization ensure surgical message precision. In addition, Adknowledge helps publishers monetize their sites and lists effectively, with great attention to contextual relevance. Since it was founded 2004, Adknowledge has grown organically and through acquisitions. This includes a 2011 purchase of Toronto-based AdParlor, one of the first Facebook Strategic Preferred Marketing Developers (sPMD). Adknowledge is based in Kansas City, Missouri; it also has North American offices in San Francisco, New York Fort Myers and Toronto. It has overseas locations in London, Paris, Munich and Shanghai with sales presence in Australia and Brazil. Today, there are approximately 300 Adknowledge employees located around the world.
Stefanie Robinson

Medicines Made in India Set Off Safety Worries - NYTimes.com - 0 views

www.nytimes.com/...ia-set-off-safety-worries.html

research evaluating resources

shared by Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • GARDINER HARRISFEB. 14
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      Critical Thinking author id, publisher id,
  • © 2014 The New York Times Company
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      copyright site
  • Denise Grady contributed reporting from Kampala, Uganda, and Hari Kumar from Srinagar, Kashmir.
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      copyright contributor credited
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • largest exporter
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      Connectivity this paragraph is jumping from being vertal to hozi
  • over-the-counter and prescription drugs to the United States
  • safety lapses, falsified drug test results and selling fake medicines
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
       credibility/reference .gov site for official documentation
  • recent lapses
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      credibility/ .gov blog of the FdA
  • interview with an Indian newspaper
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 15 Feb 14
       
      Citation/ addition outside research sources are attached to the links
  • China is the source of some of the largest counterfeit manufacturing operations that we find globally,” said John P. Clark, Pfizer’s chief security officer
Stefanie Robinson

Black Twitter Shows Off All #DangerousBlackKids America Should Fear - 0 views

www.huffingtonpost.com/...jordan-davis_n_4800187.html

reference evaluating digital Literacy _social networking

shared by Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • Posted: 02/16/2014 5:50 pm EST Updated: 02/16/2014 8:59 pm EST
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      Content title no aut/.com/public site/ updated
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      Credibility/ no auth/title id/purpose to show public banding together online/sn posts
  • Copyright © 2014 TheHuffingtonPos
  • he black
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      Critical thinkin/ saw tv recording..id publisher Citation/links direct to contributor's social network
  • ...1 more annotation...
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      citation/ new sources used thru out continuity/site updated future unknown context/ lots of links to support topic shows the movement * articles linked
Stefanie Robinson

Reality show snake handler dies from snake bite - 0 views

www.usatoday.com/...5532531

resources evaluating

shared by Stefanie Robinson on 16 Feb 14 - No Cached
  • John Bacon, USA TODAY 5:10 p.m. EST February 16, 2014
  • 6:01 p.m. EST February 16, 2014
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      Content. author and title id date current.
  • ...4 more annotations...
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      Critical Thinking Reference link owned by same company Gannett media. social networks linked/no id of publisher. using whois
  • Contribu
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      no copyright listed/ public domain story
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      connectivity/ busy site per fb shares and twit 
  • Friendly Atheis
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
      broken link
    • Stefanie Robinson
      Stefanie Robinson on 17 Feb 14
       
       Censorship/Discussion list not moderated on fb n twitter
  • Stefanie Robinson on 16 Feb 14
     
    Story put together from research from 3 different sources
chris mackie

Chris Pine pleads guilty to DUI - 0 views

www.usatoday.com/...6503411

shared by chris mackie on 17 Mar 14 - No Cached
    • chris mackie
      chris mackie on 17 Mar 14
       
      1) Content - There isn't a lot of content on this page. But what there is seems accurate and posted without bias. 2) Credibility - Since this is USA today posting an Associated Press article I would say this is a reliable source. 3) Critical Thinking - Using standard deductive reasoning I can safely assume that this article is valid. I heard about it earlier and it's on a trusted news site. 4) Copyright - This page was copyrighted in 2014. But the article itself was uploaded 8:21 PM EST. 5) Citation - This article was originally an Associated Press article and they sight that at the bottom as well as giving credit to the photographer of the picture they used. 6) Continuity - There isn't a lot of continuity problems as this article is from today. It can be updated but only by USA today staff. 7) Censorship - This page is moderated fully. You can't even post comments on this article. You can however join a community discussion if you sign up and agree to their Terms of service. 8) Connectivity - This link like many others allows users to click directly on links for additional articles. However this one also adds a link to repost it directly on social media pages. 9) Comparability - This article has been reposted and confirm by numerous sites. It seems to be originally an Associated Press article that by using Google you can get more information on. 10) - Context - Within the scope of the search for "Chris Pine, DUI" this is the exact article I was looking for. It is short and easy to read and digest without going into too many details. Web Page Evaluation: Currency - 15, Content -15, Authority -10, Navigation -10, Experience -10, Multimedia -3. Treatment -7, Access -10, Miscellaneous - 8. Total:88 - Good.
Cameron Browne

Unlocking the Power of Internet Collaboration: Adjusting Concepts So More P...: EBSCOhost - 0 views

search.ebscohost.com.oclc.fullsail.edu/login.aspx

collaboration ebscohost DGL research Digital Literacy

shared by Cameron Browne on 10 Dec 13 - No Cached
  • Cameron Browne on 10 Dec 13
  • Cameron Browne on 10 Dec 13
     
    Currency score: 13 It is stated that the document was written or updated in 2010 so it is up to date. but future updates were not stated. Content Score: 15 The article is written very professionally and is to the point. Grammar and spelling are perfect and it is in good taste. Authority Score: 10 Diane Spencer-Scarr, is a partner at an IT company and a leading researcher at Curtin University therefore very credible. Navigation Score: 10 Using EBSCO Host therefore very easy to access, links are placed well within sight and all links are relevant to your search. Experience Score: 10 Simple and easy to look at without obscuring the information. Multimedia Score: 0 No sounds or graphics. Treatment Score: 10 Fully age appropriate and professional, no stereotyping or bias. Access Score: 5 Easy to access with quick response times when links are clicked. Miscellaneous Score: 13 No awards received but the document had no pre-use cost. No private information was required and easy to print.
1 - 20 of 48 Next › Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page