Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Cheryl Stadnichuk

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Cheryl Stadnichuk

Cheryl Stadnichuk

Ontario's Investment in Indigenous Health Includes Significant Expansion of Indigenous-... - 0 views

  • Today, at Anishnawbe Mushkiki Aboriginal Health Access Centre in Thunder Bay, Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care Dr. Eric Hoskins, alongside his colleagues David Zimmer, Minister of Aboriginal Affairs, Michael Gravelle, Minister of Northern Development and Mines, and Ontario Regional Chief Isadore Day, made a ground-breaking announcement of the largest investment in Indigenous health care in Ontario’s history. This investment includes the establishment of up to 10 new or expanded Indigenous-centred primary health care teams that include traditional healing to serve Indigenous communities across the province, similar to the existing network of 10 Aboriginal Health Access Centres (AHACs).
  • Unique in Canada and made in Ontario, AHACs are Indigenous community-led primary health care organizations that embed Indigenous cultural practices and teachings at the heart of everything they do. They provide a comprehensive array of health and social services to Indigenous communities across Ontario. These services include primary care, traditional healing, mental wellness, addictions services, cultural programs, health promotion programs, early years programs, oral health care, community development initiatives, home and community care and social support services. Importantly, they work on healing the impacts of intergenerational trauma. Being community-governed, AHACs are able to respond to the specific geographic, socioeconomic and cultural needs of the diverse Indigenous communities they serve.
  •  
    aboriginal health Ontario
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Parliament has fumbled assisted death from the beginning: Tim Harper | Toronto Star - 0 views

  • OTTAWA—This country’s highest court ultimately gave Parliamentarians 16 months to craft legislation on assisted dying. That apparently wasn’t enough.Missing the court-imposed June 6 deadline will not plunge this nation into some type of chaotic constitutional abyss, but the past 16 months leading to that deadline have taught us a lot about our political system and the men and women who represent us.
  • It fell to Liberal leader Justin Trudeau, then at the helm of the third party, to call for an all-party committee to begin work on the issue. Trudeau, prophetically, said a year did not seem adequate to write legislation when Quebec took more than four years, but warned, “if we do nothing, . . . Canada will find itself without any laws governing physician-assisted death. That kind of legislative vacuum serves no one—not people who are suffering, not their anxious family members, not the compassionate physicians who offer them care.’’
  • But the work of a joint Commons-Senate committee was done in warp speed, its work was largely ignored and the Liberal push to meet the deadline meant a parliamentary committee unwilling to accept substantial amendments. A bill which comes down the middle on the question, without fully responding to the court decision, led to parliamentary skirmishes over time limits on debate, opposition obstruction, a physical skirmish in the House and a deadline drifting away.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • This Senate has already sent a report back to the Commons, saying the Liberal bill should be amended to allow advance directives from those who wish assistance in dying and are still able to let their wishes be known.When the bill comes back to the Senate, independent Liberal James Cowan will push for an amendment broadening restrictions on eligibility.
  • The B.C. Civil Liberties Association says every provincial medical regulator has issued “detailed, comprehensive” guidelines for doctors under the high court ruling. Doctors’ conscientious objection rights are protected and, under provincial guidelines, two doctors are required to confirm the patient’s eligibility and consent.The real danger may lie in future court challenges — if assisted deaths are allowed under the Supreme Court wording that would be denied under the federal legislation, the government will have a problem.We shouldn’t be here after 16 months. Canadians deserved better. They deserve a better law.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

B.C. funds caregiver network providing mental-illness support to families - The Globe a... - 0 views

  • British Columbia is providing $3-million in funding for specialized support to people living with serious mental illness and their families.Health Minister Terry Lake says the money will help the B.C. Schizophrenia Society, which also serves people affected by bipolar disorder, depression and other severe and persistent mental illnesses. Lake says the money will help to expand the society’s provincewide caregiver network so families dealing with a mentally ill loved one can get the emotional support they need.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Medical regulators in every province impose safeguards for assisted dying - The Globe a... - 0 views

  • Medical regulators in every province have issued detailed guidelines doctors must follow to help suffering patients end their lives once Canada’s ban on medically assisted dying is formally lifted next month.And most of those guidelines impose safeguards similar to — or even more stringent than — those included in the federal government’s proposed new law on assisted death. The existence of guidelines in every province undercuts federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould’s contention that there’ll be a dangerous legal void if the government’s controversial new law on assisted dying isn’t enacted by June 6.
  • Like the proposed federal law, most of the various guidelines produced by provincial colleges of physicians and surgeons require that at least two doctors must agree that a patient meets the eligibility criteria for an assisted death, that a patient must submit a written request signed by witnesses, that there be a waiting period between the request and the provision of an assisted death, that a patient must be competent to give free, informed consent throughout the process, up to the time of dying.Some impose more stringent safeguards, for instance putting the age of consent at 19 rather than the federally proposed 18, and requiring a psychiatric assessment in cases where depression or mental illness might impair a patient’s ability to give consent.The one big difference, said Paterson, is that the provincial guidelines rely on the relatively permissive eligibility criteria spelled out by the Supreme Court whereas the federal government is proposing more restrictive conditions.
  • Yet the federal government has all but ignored the wishes of medical regulators and the guidelines they’ve produced, citing instead approval of its proposed law by the Canadian Medical Association, which lobbies on behalf of doctors but does not regulate, license or discipline them.“I’m not sure that the federal government generally ... has a good understanding about the role of medical regulators and our powers and our authority and our ability to regulate our professions,” said Theman.“So it may be that they see a void (if the legislation isn’t enacted by June 6) because they’re not used to dealing with us and they’re less aware of what we’re capable of.”
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Older women more likely to be prescribed inappropriate drugs: study - The Globe and Mail - 0 views

  • That does not necessarily mean that doctors treat older women differently. Morgan noted that women are more likely to seek medical attention for anxiety and sleeplessness, whereas men are more likely to self-medicate with alcohol and other drugs, according to previous research.Overuse of tranquilizers in both sexes may stem from long-term prescription renewals, he said. “We suspect that many people actually started using them 10 or 15, or maybe 20 years earlier, when they were middle-aged.”
  • The study, published this month in the medical journal Age and Ageing, analyzed population-based data from British Columbia’s PharmaNet, a province-wide network that links B.C. pharmacies to central databases.Rates of inappropriate prescribing for older adults are similarly high in other parts of the country, according to a 2012 study conducted by the Canadian Institute For Health Information.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Cuts force new approach to geriatric care at MUHC - Montreal - CBC News - 0 views

  • The McGill University Health Centre has shut down its geriatric acute-care ward at the Montreal General Hospital. The ward had been shrinking: In early 2015, there were 28 geriatric acute-care beds at the Royal Victoria Hospital. That was reduced to 25 in March 2015, then down to 15 and – transferred to the Montreal General – when the Royal Victoria moved to the brand new Glen Site. 
  • The cuts mean the highly specialized, integrated team of nurses, doctors and other professionals that used to watch over the frailest patients is now dispersed. "We hope that these nurses will progressively influence how things work on different services," said Morais. "Plus our team will be there and working with them and making the hospital develops the right approach to that frail population." The doctors will still follow patients and the out-patient clinic is still functioning, he said. But Morais acknowledges that with more than 30 per cent of admissions being geriatric, no single ward was going to be able to care for them. He said health care professionals in all divisions will need to learn to manage geriatric conditions such as incontinence, dementia, mobility issues and nutrition.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Capacity of Ontario hospitals being stretched | Ontario | News | Toronto Sun - 0 views

  • Deep cuts to funding are causing dangerous over-crowding and have put the province’s hospitals — including the country’s most important children’s hospital — on life support. Opposition critics say cuts mean emergency rooms across the province are struggling to cope with new patients — and there’s no room in the hospitals for patients that need admitting. Documents released by the New Democrats last week show many hospitals are over capacity. Toronto’s world-renowned Hospital for Sick Children is at 100% capacity, say the figures obtained by the NDP under a freedom of information request
  • A spokesman for the hospital confirmed they’ve been experiencing a surge in patients. “SickKids has been experiencing high volumes of patients and the complexity of these patients appears to be increasing,” said Matet Nebres. “For example, the volumes in our emergency department in February were up 50% over the same month last year and our critical care units have been operating at or above physical capacity for a number of months now.” That creates challenges in terms of dealing with unexpected or unplanned surges in clinical demand, she said. Workers at the hospital are doing their best to care for the children, she said.
  • “We’re also looking at ways in which we can work more closely with our partners across the healthcare system to ensure that children get high-quality care as close to home as possible,” she said. Deputy Premier and Treasury Board Chair Deb Matthews defended the hospital cuts, saying the plan is to have patients stay a shorter time in hospital and go home faster. Overall healthcare funding increased $1 billion this year, she said. “There are too many people in hospitals who actually would be better served outside hospitals,” Matthews said. “As length of stay after procedures comes down, people get home more quickly, we need to provide the support for them outside the hospital.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Brown said there were 33 beds in hallways when he visited Brampton Civic Hospital recently and the ER has 50,000 more visits than they can handle. In Timmins, he was told the 1% funding increase the hospital got barely covers the increased cost of electricity, let alone the collective bargaining increases and the inflationary healthcare costs. Cuts are a reason why doctors and nurses are at loggerheads with the government, he said.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

If amalgamation is in the cards, Florizone wants to mitigate risks | Saskatoon StarPhoenix - 0 views

  • With the Saskatchewan Party government foreshadowing changes in health care administration, returning Saskatoon Health Region CEO Dan Florizone said lessons can be learned from the Alberta Health Service model. “These are interesting questions, and what I would want to do is collect the analysis,” he said. Florizone returned to work Wednesday after going on personal health leave in November, with 3S Health CEO Andrew Will filling in. Florizone received the medical all-clear on Monday and debriefed with Will on Tuesday night.
  • “We are just over 1.1 million people and so we’re going to look at whether or not we have the right governance structure for a system of that size in terms of the number of people we do serve,” Health Minister Dustin Duncan said Wednesday. The process won’t happen overnight and won’t be driven top-down by government, he said. “This is really trying to set the stage for not just the next year or two. This is really looking at some of the fundamental drivers of the system. We have to be prepared for the next 20 and 30 years.” Florizone, who as assistant deputy health minister ran the previous amalgamation to 12 health regions, said people can “look forward to, if not amalgamation, certainly more by way of shared services, shared programs, shared administration, where we look at ourselves in broader geographic terms.”
  • In 2008, the Alberta Health Service (AHS) brought together 12 formerly separate health entities, including three health authorities. Florizone said the first step is to understand the outcomes in Alberta. As with any organizational change, there was a “traumatic period” for administration and staff, he said. Florizone suggested the AHS is the biggest corporation in Canada.  “With big bureaucracy comes complexity and I would like to understand the benefits — and there are benefits. I’d like to understand the risks, and any problems that they encountered. “So if there was a suggestion by the government that we move to one, what we’d want to do is learn from others — Alberta — and mitigate any risks that exist.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • An injection of $10 million from the health ministry has been helpful, he said, noting the latest financial statements show a year-end deficit of about $35.7 million, which could have been as high as $48 million. “It’s a deep, deep worry of the administration, of the organization, of the board; we can’t continue to run deficits. We’ve got to be able to bring our budget into balance,” Florizone said. The health region is implementing a sustainability plan, which in the short term has focused on reducing paid hours, the largest driver of the deficit. Florizone said he hopes job losses can be avoided as much as possible. Board chair Mike Stensrud said the more waste that can be eliminated, the fewer jobs that will be cut. Despite the financial crunch, the health region will never fail to make its payroll, he said.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Health regions wait and see what 'transformational change' means | Regina Leader-Post - 0 views

  • Health regions in the province are in wait-and-see mode until the province releases more information on what, exactly, its promised “transformational changes” to those administrative bodies will mean. Regina Qu’Appelle Health Region (RQHR) president and CEO Keith Dewar wasn’t surprised to hear Tuesday’s throne speech make reference to Premier Brad Wall’s plan for big changes coming to the delivery of public service, including health. What that actually means for the RQHR and other regions, though, is unknown. Wall has signalled the June 1 budget will set the stage for a year’s worth of consultation on the matter, much of which will focus on cutting administrative cost.
  • Health Minister Dustin Duncan said “continual improvement through transformation is not new to the health care sector in Saskatchewan and the government is looking to balance the cost of front line and administrative costs. “We would just expect that whether you work in front line staff or in admin, just hope and trust people are going to continue to do their jobs as we work through this process, it’s not going to happen over night,” said Duncan. He said the need for such “transformational change” is caused by an aging population. The majority of a person’s health costs over their life are used as they approach old age, and with a number of baby boomers approaching retirement, those days are coming.
  • In 2008, the Alberta Health Service (AHS) brought together 12 formerly separate health entities, including three health authorities. It is one of the biggest employers in Canada and, when created, was set up to run like a $13-billion corporation by a board of directors
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Dr. Trina Larsen Soles defeats Dr. Brian Day in election to become next president of Do... - 0 views

  • Dr. Larsen Soles was running against orthopedic surgeon Dr. Brian Day, who's long advocated for a parallel private health-care system. Dr. Day created the privately owned Cambie Surgery Centre. He launched a lawsuit several years ago against the B.C. government over restrictions imposed on patients from buying health-care services from the private sector.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

QC Auditor General misses point: extra-billing is illegal | Press Releases | Newsroom - 1 views

  • TORONTO (May 12, 2016) – Extra-billing in Quebec medical clinics are “excessive” says Auditor General Guylaine Leclerc, but Federal Health Minister Jane Philpott has yet to act on calls to enforce the Canada Health Act and bring them under control. Leclerc tabled her Spring 2016 report yesterday in the National Assembly, which focused on the billing practices of medical clinics patients for services already covered by provincial insurance, or extra billing. According to the audit’s findings, neither the Ministry of Health (MSSS) nor Quebec’s health insurance board (RAMQ) are providing sufficient guidance and oversight with clinics and their billing practices.
  • Leclerc failed to recognize extra-billing prohibits equitable access to health care as well as violates sections 18 to 21 of the Canada Health Act. “Charging fees to patients for services covered by Quebec’s provincial insurance hurts everyone,” said Dr. Monika Dutt, Chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare. “They deter people from seeking care, make health outcomes worse and in the end, drive up the costs as people get sicker before seeking treatment. Extra-billing is also not allowed under the Canada Health Act.” In March, Canadian Doctors for Medicare (CDM) asked the Honourable Jane Philpott, Canada’s Minister of Health, to defend and enforce the Canada Health Act against contraventions in British Columbia, Saskatchewan, Ontario as well as Quebec. CDM reiterated their concerns at May 3 press conference in Montreal hosted by FADOQ, a leading seniors’ organization in Quebec, that is seeking a writ of mandamus from the Federal Court to compel the Minister of Health to enforce the Act in the province.
  • “As physicians, our organization’s goal is to improve Medicare, which will not happen if the provincial and federal governments continue to ignore the problem of extra-billing,” Dutt continued. “CDM calls on the federal government to protect public Medicare in Quebec and across Canada by applying the penalties prescribed in the Act against extra billing.” Canadian Doctors for Medicare provides a voice for Canadian doctors who want to strengthen and improve Canada's universal publicly-funded health care system. We advocate for innovations in treatment and prevention services that are evidence-based and improve access, quality, equity and sustainability.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

New Democrats introduce bill to ban pay-for-plasma clinics and protect blood supply | B... - 0 views

  • VICTORIA— New Democrat health spokesperson, Judy Darcy, introduced a private member’s bill in the legislature that would ban pay-for-plasma clinics in British Columbia. The Safe Blood for B.C. Act, is modeled after similar legislation in Ontario, and would protect British Columbia patients from the health risks of tainted blood, while ensuring we do not threaten the supply of voluntary blood donations in this province.
  • “There are companies operating in Canada that are paying for plasma donations. They locate in poor neighbourhoods, close to pay-day-loan shops and pawn shops and we understand they are looking to set up shop in this province,” said Darcy. “The health minister has not taken action, so it was up to the opposition to protect B.C.’s blood supply.” “Justice Krever recommended strongly against paying for plasma in his commission, and was very clear that blood should remain a public resource and that donors should not be paid. Paying for blood products represents a threat to the safety of our blood supply, which was why his commission recommended strongly against paying for plasma,” said Darcy. “This bill lives up to the spirit of that recommendation. It supports the position of the World Health Organization which clearly states that voluntary blood donations are safer and calls for a completely voluntary blood donation system by 2020.”
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Health Canada hasn't fined Quebec in past decade for medicare violations | Montreal Gaz... - 0 views

  • Despite raising concerns about the prevalence of user fees in Quebec, among other violations of the Canada Health Act, Health Canada hasn’t penalized the province for more than a decade while other provinces have been fined repeatedly. A Montreal Gazette review of Health Canada’s annual reports since 2002-2003 has found that the federal agency has warned Quebec more often than not about a wide range of contraventions against medicare — most recently, last year about user charges — but has not deducted penalties from funding transfers to the province. By comparison, Health Canada has penalized British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Nova Scotia, as well as Newfoundland and Labrador for a total of $10.1 million in that time period. In its latest available report last year, Health Canada noted that it “wrote to the Quebec Ministry of Health concerning patient charges by physicians, when they provide certain publicly insured health services in their offices or private clinics. Health Canada’s consultation with Quebec on this issue is ongoing.”
  • The Montreal Gazette’s review has found that, unlike most other provinces, Quebec routinely declines to provide Health Canada with relevant statistical information about its private for-profit clinics. The issue of enforcing the Canada Health Act (CHA) arose last week after patient-rights groups across Quebec filed a lawsuit against the federal government to compel Health Canada to put an end to illegal extra billing and user charges in the province. Dr. Isabelle Leblanc, president of the pro-medicare group Médecins québécois pour le régime public, said she was taken aback over the fact that Quebec hasn’t been fined in more than a decade despite the proliferation of two-tier medicine in the province and the growth of so-called accessory fees, such as $200 eye drops. “The principles of the Canada Health Act should be the same throughout Canada,” Leblanc added. “If the federal government acts on non-compliance in one province, they should do it for all other provinces.” The CHA, adopted in 1984, gives the federal government the power to assign financial penalties over medicare violations. The penalties are deducted from federal funding transfers to the provinces.
  • British Columbia and Alberta have been fined the most of all provinces since 2002-2003, but Leblanc argued that queue-jumping, extra billing and user charges — all violations under the CHA — are just as widespread in Quebec, perhaps more so in recent years. Leblanc suggested that Health Canada might be more reluctant to crack down on medicare violations in Quebec for political reasons. “It’s probably different for the federal government to do something in Quebec than the other provinces,” she said. “Quebec has a different perception of what is a provincial duty and what is a federal duty.”
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Health Canada’s annual reports show that Quebec has sometimes complied with its concerns. But in its 2003-2004 report, the agency observed that the Quebec government was “not at liberty to reveal the status of the province’s investigation” into user charges imposed by a private surgical clinic. A year earlier, Health Canada expressed concern “about private surgical clinics that allow individuals to privately pay for medically insured services and thus jump the queue. … Health Canada asked Quebec to confirm that the matter had been resolved.” A long-standing complaint of Quebec by Health Canada is that it allows patients to be charged for MRIs and CT scans if they are done in private clinics. In its 2004-2005 report, Health Canada held discussions with British Columbia, Alberta and Nova Scotia about charging for medical imaging in private clinics, but Quebec refused to participate. 
  • Health Canada officials did not respond to requests for an interview since last Thursday. Reacting to the Quebec lawsuit last week, federal Health Minister Jane Philpott said she’s a strong supporter of the CHA, and did not rule out reducing transfer payments to provinces that flout the law.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Quebec auditor general's report: User fees in clinics uncontrolled | Montreal Gazette - 0 views

  • Doctors have argued in the past that they need the extra money to pay their operating costs, but the report recommended the health department take time to really “assess the operating costs of clinics, determine the funding to be granted and consider the funding already paid.”
  • QUEBEC — Extra fees charged in private clinics for procedures covered by medicare are not being controlled and may be abusive, the province’s auditor general said in a report Tuesday. Extra billing has been in dispute ever since the government of Quebec adopted Bill 20 in November. The bill aimed, among other things, to regulate add-on fees by creating a standardized price list. The situation remains ambiguous, confusing and misunderstood, auditor general Guylaine Leclerc wrote in her report. Neither the health department nor Quebec’s health insurance board (RAMQ) has a firm grip on these add-on fees, which are estimated at $50 million a year, she noted. For example, the report said, Quebecers are charged between $300 and $400 for a colonoscopy, $125 to $225 for a vasectomy, $51 to $100 for a biopsy and $5 to $50 for an excision, depending on the clinic. 
  • Lawyer Jean-Pierre Ménard insisted last week Quebec is the worst offender when it comes to over-billing patients, and that the fees are creating a two-tier health-care system that may violate the Canada Health Act. With Ménard’s help, various patients’-rights groups have come together to launch legal action against the federal government to make sure the Canada Health Act is applied in Quebec and other provinces. Reacting to the report Tuesday, Health Minister Gaétan Barrette reiterated his recent promise to abolish add-on fees by possibly rolling them into doctors’ salaries. “For care that is medically required, there won’t be any fees,” he told reporters.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Parti Québécois MNA Diane Lamarre said Barrette’s “about-face” is the result of relentless criticisms by her and the PQ. “When we started studying Bill 20, we were fighting the fact that the minister introduced an amendment that authorized accessory fees,” Lamarre said. “It was a new opportunity to charge, legally, new medical fees. … We asked the minister many times to (scrap) his amendment and he refused. “(It) was a way to introduce accessory fees and make some patients with no money unable to have access to medical services, which is completely against the law. Now we’re proud that he changed his mind,” she said. Both Lamarre and Coalition Avenir Québec MNA François Paradis said they are concerned Barrette will not be able to convince doctors’ associations to include the fees in their remuneration. If doctors’ salaries are boosted by an additional $50 million in the next contract agreement, for example, it will mean that collectively we will all be paying the fees indirectly, Paradis said.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Food in hospitals and prisons is terrible - but it doesn't have to be that way - The Gl... - 0 views

  • Each Ontario hospital sets its own food budget, since the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care doesn’t give hospitals a cost guideline. North York General Hospital in uptown Toronto spends $4.46-million a year on food service: $1.66-million for food, plus $2.8-million for labour. The hospital says it had 144,165 “inpatient days” in 2014-15, which works out to $11.51 for food and $19.42 for labour, each day, per patient.
  • The hospital uses Steamplicity, a meal program by Compass, a global food service provider with annual sales of $31-billion. It’s one of the main providers of large-scale food service in Canada; its competitors include Sysco, Gordon Food Service, Aramark and Sodexo.Steamplicity meals are made in a production facility in Mississauga: food and water are put in “bespoke packaging” (it appears to be a plastic container) that has a valve designed to pop open when the internal temperature reaches 120 Celsius in a microwave. “The result is hot, delicious food, which retains its essential nutrients, where the flavour and texture of the food are preserved,” says Saira Husain, a spokeswoman for Compass.
  • “It sounds good, but is almost all frozen and quite highly processed,” says Joshna Maharaj, a chef and food advocate who has led changes in the kitchens at The Stop Community Food Centre, Ryerson University and the Hospital for Sick Children. “The biggest problem with frozen food is that it ends up quite watery, and everything is soft, one texture. Clinical.”From 2011 to 2012, Maharaj attempted to revolutionize the food at Scarborough General Hospital in east Toronto. Using grants from the province and the Greenbelt Fund, she bought ingredients from local farmers, changed the menu to reflect the community’s food culture (congee, jerk chicken) and trained the kitchen staff to cook from scratch.Sadly, the changes were all temporary. Scarborough General declined to say why it abandoned Maharaj’s program – she says the lunch tray, for example, cost just 33 cents more using her preferred ingredients – but the hospital no longer cooks food on site.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • She says she had greater success at Ryerson University, where she was hired to overhaul the food service from 2013 to 2015. “Ryerson was tremendous. We created a beautiful model and the students responded to it,” she says.Under her direction, staff stopped reheating soup from a bag and learned to cook from scratch with raw ingredients. “Soup easily became one of the most popular things on the campus,” she says. “Because it was good and made with thoughtfulness and not that much more work.”The big take-away for Maharaj was learning to negotiate with the companies that provide the food. “Working with a third-party operator is the undeniable piece you have to address when you’re talking about institutional food,” she says. “And these operators are the people we need to start talking to when we want change.”
  • “The vegetables are almost non-existent. They’ll throw a couple on the plate. You’ll have a spoonful of some nasty peas. And they’re not even green no more. They’re grey,” says Tom, who also says powdered mashed potatoes are served multiple times a week (“Both dehydrated and fresh potatoes are used in both the cook-chill and institutional kitchens,” Ross says.)Tom avoided eating chicken entirely when he was in jail. Another woman I spoke with, who spent a year at Vanier from 2010 to 2011, says the poultry was routinely served undercooked and pink. She says she relied on food purchased at the canteen, mostly ramen noodles. When dinner was “fish slop” – a dish she describes as “garbage with fish parts in it” – inmates would run to their stashes, softening the noodles with hot water from the sink over the toilet.
  • In 2012, Paulette Padanyi, a now-retired faculty member of the University of Guelph, co-wrote a research paper called Food Provision in Ontario Hospitals and Long Term Care Facilities. Of the 55 hospitals studied, 19 hospital administrators agreed to discuss their food budgets. All of them outsourced the food production. Most told Padanyi that they took their cue from long-term-care facilities, which have a prescribed Ministry of Health and Long Term Care rate of $8.03 per day per patient to spend on food.In 2012, the average amount spent per patient in the hospitals Padanyi looked at was $7.91 a day. “They say to the contractors, ‘You’ve got x number of dollars, eight bucks a day per patient or whatever,’ effectively downloading the responsibility of meeting that budget,” she says.Often, these contracts are not just for patient meals, but the staffing and operation of food franchises within the hospital, plus housekeeping and custodial. The main conclusion of Padyani’s report was that food service is considered unimportant relative to the entire hospital.
  • Tom, a former prisoner introduced to me through the John Howard Society (which asked that I not use his last name), has served time at various correctional facilities around Ontario and suffers from diabetes and Crohn’s disease. He challenges Ross’s statement. “They don’t follow diets,” says Tom, who is in his 30s, was first locked up at the age of 12 and has spent more than 10 years behind bars. “Any jail food, you’re going to be on the toilet six times a day because what they’re giving you is running though you.”
  • Compass employs half a million people around the world (including 30,000 in Canada), and supplies food to schools, offices, stadiums, museums, mining camps and offshore drilling platforms, as well as hospitals and correctional centres. Of the company’s many customers, patients and inmates have two things in common: First, they are unable to go buy themselves something more healthy, or at least more tasty; and second, we, the taxpayer, are responsible for feeding them.Last November, Compass took over food services at the Regina Correctional Centre, a move that saved the Saskatchewan government $2.4-million a year. Lacking a Yelp page, inmates went on a hunger strike in January to protest against the quality of the food. “If you don’t like the prison food, don’t go to prison,” Premier Brad Wall responded. In March, inmates refused food again, in part because Compass had raised prices at the canteen.Ontario spends $14.54 a day per inmate to feed about 8,000 prisoners in 26 correctional facilities, for a total of $41.3-million a year, including labour and transportation. The food cost is $9.17 for three meals. Perhaps inmates should not, per our punitive view of criminal justice, be dining on lamb racks and truffles. But it’s hard to imagine eating healthy on $9.17 a day.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

It's beyond time for a clear policy on paying donors for plasma - The Globe and Mail - 1 views

  • Canadian Plasma Resources, having failed miserably with its plan to pay plasma donors in Toronto, has now set up shop in Saskatoon.Why Saskatchewan – or any other province, for that matter – would align itself with a company that has a controversial history and business plan is odd, especially given Canada’s painful history with tainted blood. And it is doubly puzzling because the provinces own Canadian Blood Services (CBS), the not-for-profit agency that collects blood and plasma (from volunteer, non-remunerated donors) in Canada, and whose efforts are undermined by the private company’s tactics. It’s as if the right hand doesn’t know what the left hand is doing.
  • Regardless, the festering presence of Canadian Plasma Resources has forced us to come to grips with the pros and cons of paid plasma. The Krever Inquiry – an exhaustive examination of the debacle that left more than 30,000 Canadians infected with HIV-AIDS and hepatitis C from tainted blood and blood products – said that donors should not be paid, “except in rare circumstances.”The World Health Organization also says countries should aspire to 100-per-cent voluntary blood and plasma donations by 2020. But the stark reality is that blood (and plasma in particular) is a big and profitable business with an expanding market.
  • Ethically, the notion of paying for bodily fluids and body parts makes us uncomfortable. In Canada, we have banned the sale of sperm, eggs and organs, in large part due to fears the poor and vulnerable could be exploited. But only two provinces, Quebec and Ontario, have banned the sale of blood and plasma.There is also a safety issue. While there is evidence that paying for blood attracts higher-risk donors, it doesn’t necessarily mean the end product is less safe – even if companies such as Canadian Plasma Resources set-up shop next door to homeless shelters.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Regardless of source, it’s important to ensure the safety and security of supply for patients who need blood and blood products. Currently, CBS collects about 200,000 litres of plasma annually. That is enough to produce only about 22 per cent of blood products such as intravenous immunoglobulin, which is used to treat a growing number of immune disorders. That product is purchased from the United States and Switzerland.
  • Currently, there are no manufacturers of blood products in Canada. However, both Green Cross Biotherapeutics and Therapure Biopharma are getting into the business. Within five years, CBS hopes to increase collection markedly to about 500,000 litres a year, with the use of dedicated plasma collection centres. But CBS has no plans to pay donors, other than the traditional cookies and juice. Nor does it plan to buy plasma from other providers, such as Canadian Plasma Resources.In fact, what Canadian Plasma Resources plans to do with the plasma it has collected is unclear as it does not have license from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which means it essentially can’t sell its plasma in the United States. What is clear, however, is that there is a lot of action in the blood business; as opportunities arise, we must be careful to not repeat the errors at the root of the tainted-blood debacle. What policy makers need to do now is come up with a clear, coherent position on issues such as paying for plasma and domestic production of blood products rather than grasping at every shiny bauble that comes along.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Review gives good marks to surgical speed-up | Regina Leader-Post - 1 views

  • Adjust Comment Print Janice MacKinnon remembers NDP-leaning friends who were aghast at the prospect of private surgical clinics in the home of medicare — until they actually used them. The clinics worked and they’ve cut Saskatchewan’s surgical wait times from the longest in the country to the shortest, said MacKinnon, who gave the Saskatchewan Surgical Initiative a positive review in a Fraser Institute study released Tuesday.
  • MacKinnon said there were other important elements, like a Supreme Court decision that told governments, “if you have a monopoly on the service, you have to provide it in a timely way.” As well, the government had just received Tony Dagnone’s “Patient First” report that, as she interpreted it, said health care should be done for the benefit of patients, not for others in the system — like doctors, nurses, hospital staff, and their unions. She said the government followed up by bringing into the initiative working groups of physicians, nurses and hospital managers, all encouraged to focus on speeding up the process for patients.
  • MacKinnon contrasted this with an attempt at cutting wait times in the 1990s that went nowhere because health-care unions told the public that changes wouldn’t work. The surgical initiative, one the other hand, went over the unions’ heads to the public itself. Health Minister Duncan Duncan acknowledged Tuesday wait times have lengthened in recent months, particularly in the Regina and Saskatoon health regions, and reflecting increased demand. “We’ll be mindful of that in this fiscal year, when the budget comes out,” he said, adding “we don’t want to lose the ground that we did gain.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • MacKinnon also challenged two frequent criticisms of private clinics: that they’d cream off the easiest surgeries and steal the best staff. Instead, she says surgeries were assigned by health regions and clinics hired retired nurses and nurse practitioners who liked the better hours and low-hassle atmosphere. She noted that surgeries — which covered only an array of specialties, not a complete list of surgeries — came in 26 per cent cheaper than in hospitals. “I think it was extremely well done.” Only in Canada, she said, would there be any fuss over who owns the clinics providing service in a single-payer system, MacKinnon said.
  •  
    Former SK NDP Finance Minister Janice MacKinnon is now shilling for the Fraser Institute promoting private clinics to reduce surgical wait times. The root problem of wait times if the structure and funding of Medicare, she says.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

More than 500 doctors billed Ontario for more than $1 million in fees last year, health... - 0 views

  • The most expensive doctor in Ontario, an eye specialist, billed the province for $6.6 million last year. We don’t know his or her name or where he or she practices, but we know how much that work costs taxpayers each year thanks to a release Friday by the Ontario government of the billing information of the province’s most expensive doctors. Getty Images/ThinkstockThe Ontario Medical Association says physicians have already seen a 6.9 per cent cut over the last year, but the province wants to rein in fees for radiologists and other specialists. Over the 2014 to 2015 time period, more than 500 doctors billed the province for more than $1 million in fees. They represent just two per cent of all doctors, but cost $677 million a year, or over six per cent of the more than $11-billion Ontario spends each year on physician compensation. And many of them charge much more than $1 million, the government’s release shows. Thirty-six billed more than $2 million.
  • The release intends to debunk a recent ad campaign from the Ontario Medical Association (OMA) arguingthe province’s efforts to rein in certain types of doctors’ fees is hurting patient care. It’s all part of a years-long dispute over doctor fees that’s pitted MDs against the province in a war over patients’ (and voters) hearts and minds. Yet, it’s not family doctors’ fees and their practices that Health Minister Eric Hoskins wants to see reduced, but the most costly specialists’ billings.
  • “It’s not our neurosurgeons who are billing over $1 million,” Hoskins said, “It’s a very narrow category of specialists. The data released shows three specialties tend to bill the most of the 506 doctors who topped $1 million: 154 diagnostic radiologists made the list, 85 opthamologists (eye surgeons) and 57 cardiologists. Twenty-five of the highest billing doctors specialize in addictions and prescribing methadone. 
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • He wants the OMA to return to the negotiating table and discuss lowering some of the 7,300 fees on the physicians’ pay schedule. He said the province has made no less than 80 offers since talks broke down two years ago — close to one a week — to no avail. If they don’t, he said he’s prepared to make another unilateral cut (even though the cuts imposed in 2015 have already sparked the second Charter challenge from the OMA this decade). “If necessary we will be forced to make those changes,” he said. Hoskins doesn’t want to cut back on all doctors’ pay, but create a more equal system that doesn’t go over budget every single years, as has historically been the case.
  • “The top biller, an ophthalmologist, billed more than $6.6 million last year. The top diagnostic radiologist billed more than $5.1 million and the top anesthesiologist billed more than $3.8 million,” a government fact-sheet states. That’s far above the average doctor’s gross payment of $368,000 a year. And though the OMA argues that often doesn’t account for overhead and staffing costs, the province also subsidizes pay in many indirect and direct ways, including allowing doctors to incorporate, which reduces tax and liability burdens. Ontario, unlike many provinces, covers 80 per cent of doctors’ liability insurance. Hoskins said the ministry even sometimes covers hardware costs like computers.
  • Hoskins says his goal is to make things more equal and better distribute the money going to certain specialists whose work has gotten easier. MRIs and CT scans used to take an hour, now they take 20 minutes. Same with cataract surgery — that’s why diagnostic radiologists and eye surgeons are so disproportionally represented on the list.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Hoskins quietly works on pharmacare - 0 views

  • By almost any measure, Eric Hoskins has had a rough time over the past few months. A chorus of doctors is demanding he be fired as Ontario's health minister because their fees are being trimmed; patients are staging protest rallies over cuts at local hospitals; health-care stakeholders are resisting his plans to dramatically reform the home-care system; political opponents are attacking him for the government's handling of the suicide crisis in the remote First Nations community of Attawapiskat. The list goes on.
  • The reasons Canada is nowhere close to implementing such a plan are simple: stiff opposition from private insurance companies and skittish politicians who don't want anything to do with raising any taxes — even for a sensible and fiscally solid cause — for fear of voter backlash. Over the past year, Hoskins has quietly pushed the pharmacare agenda with provincial and federal health ministers. As a start, he convinced his colleagues at a meeting in January to set up a working group to look into the issue. Now he's stepping up his efforts as Ottawa turns its attention towards the coming negotiations later this year on a new federal-provincial health accord. He wants pharmacare to be a key part of the accord talks.
  • In July, the proposed plan will be high on the agenda when the premiers hold their annual meeting. In October, Hoskins will host the next federal-provincial meeting of health ministers, where he will again lobby hard for a national framework accord on pharmacare. His long-term goal is to have an agreement by July 1, 2017, that says at a minimum Canada will have a national plan in place within five years. To help Hoskins succeed, the public needs to become involved and tell politicians they care deeply about this issue. It will be impossible to get traction on pharmacare unless there's a sustained public call for action. A concerted public campaign would help ensure improved access to prescription drugs for all Ontario and Canadian residents, providing them with the medications they need.
Cheryl Stadnichuk

Canadian Blood Services: A bloody shame | rankandfile.ca - 1 views

  • Eight PEI blood collection workers, all women, all part timers, have been on strike for close to eight months now. As Rankandfile reported in January, the women want a guaranteed minimum number of hours each week. That would allow them to qualify for benefits, and bring a bit of predictability into their daily lives. Their employer, Canadian Blood Services (CBS), isn’t budging. CBS is a not-for-profit, charitable organization operating everywhere in Canada except Quebec. Its sole mission is to manage the blood supply for Canadians. Its budget of roughly $1 billion is mostly provincial money.
  • No matter what happens, the significance of the strike extends well beyond PEI.  The Charlottetown workers are fighting the same issues CBS workers Canada-wide are facing. Not just workers, generous donors anywhere are also encountering obstacles when looking to donate blood. Some argue that CBS is in such a rush to cut costs that it even puts the safety of our blood supply in jeopardy.
  • CBS likes its workers part time and precarious, not just in PEI but anywhere in Canada. That was the consensus when unions representing CBS workers all across Canada met in Vancouver last fall, Mike Davidson tells Rankandfile.  Davidson is the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) national representative for three CBS Locals in New Brunswick. “If CBS had it their way, their clinics would  be all staffed by volunteers, and if they couldn’t have that, they’d settle for an entirely casual workforce,” says Davidson. Two of the New Brunswick locals have a few part-timers with guaranteed hours, and it has been an ongoing struggle to keep it that way, Davidson says.  In all of the three New Brunswick locals there are only three full-time unionized employees. “There is no stability. (CBS) doesn’t want stability,” says Davidson. “Meanwhile, they complain about a lack of commitment by the workers.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Davidson also has an idea where to find the money. “We always tell them to look at their executives wages. It’s definitely a top heavy bloated organization.” Indeed, CBS CEO Dr. Graham Sher, earned more than $800 thousand last year. An astounding nine Vice Presidents together made another cool $3.2 million.
  • It’s one thing to want to keep your workers poor and precarious. Many companies do it. But donors? “These days donors probably have more complaints about scheduling and clinic times than employees do.” That’s what Ron Stockton told us when we first talked to him in January of this year. Stockton is the  NSUPE business agent for the PEI local now on strike. “With CBS it is never about delivering service, it is always about getting the biggest bang for your buck,” Stockton says. A 2015 press release issued by CBS announced the Canada-wide closure of three permanent clinics, the replacement of a permanent clinic with a mobile one, pulling mobile clinics from 16 communities, and “adjusting clinic schedules across the country.” “CBS is being transformed into a business, as opposed to a public service or a humanitarian organization. These days it’s all about automation and squeezing efficiencies out of donors and workers,” Stockton concludes.
  • “When you walk into the clinic you register by inserting your health card into some kind of ATM machine, then you have your blood taken by an employee who is too rushed to talk to you, then you schedule your next appointment at another machine. “Having  been a donor, I can tell you donors want to see people,” Stockton says. “I am old enough to remember the days when staff taking your blood had time to talk to you. “Doesn’t happen anymore, to CBS you are a piece of meat giving blood, you could be a bag.”
  • Lately CBS has been in the news because of its endorsement of Canadian Plasma Resources, a private for-profit company that wants to pay for plasma donations.  The Saskatchewan company is eying Nova Scotia and New Brunswick for expansion. Organizations such as Bloodwatch and public healthcare advocates in the Maritimes have strongly opposed the introduction of private for-profit clinics while we have an effective not-for-profit blood service already in place. Paying for donations is asking for trouble, they believe. But concerns around the quality of our blood supply go deeper. “Workers in our locals fear for the safety of this blood system altogether,” Davidson warns. “CBS is more concerned about cost savings than about the safety of the blood supply. They have  pared the organization down so much that all resilience and safety is removed, and we are going right back to 1997,” Davidson says.
  • “CBS tries to make its operation as lean as possible,” he says. “We cautioned them to make sure that there are no system failures such as the Krever enquiry identified. But they are continually watering it down. It’s all about dollars and cents for them.” When front line CBS workers are concerned about safety, then provincial Health ministers who fund CBS to the tune of $1 billion per year should listen, says Davidson. “We call upon the responsible ministers to step up and pay attention. We need to raise the alarm that things are not good.”
  •  
    Canadian Blood Services
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 63 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page