Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged migration

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Irene Jansen

WHO | Managing health workforce migration - The Global Code of Practice - 0 views

  •  
    section 4.6: 4.6 Member States and other stakeholders should take measures to ensure that migrant health personnel enjoy opportunities and incentives to strengthen their professional education, qualifications and career progression, on the basis of equal treatment with the domestically trained health workforce subject to applicable laws. All migrant health personnel should be offered appropriate induction and orientation programmes that enable them to operate safely and effectively within the health system of the destination country.
Irene Jansen

A Study of Home Help Finds Low Worker Pay and Few Benefits - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • With the exception of caregivers who provide “companionship care” for the aged and infirm, domestic workers like nannies and house cleaners are covered by federal minimum wage laws
    • Irene Jansen
       
      2.5 million home care aides are excluded from federal minimum wage and overtime protections in the Federal Labor Standards Act, a regulation Obama promised last December to revise
Doug Allan

PRHC chops 53 jobs, 4 beds - Infomart - 0 views

  • Citing three consecutive years of funding freezes coupled with inflation, debt payments and rising staffing costs, the Peterborough Regional Health Centre announced Wednesday it would be cutting 53 positions, mostly registered nurses.
  • "When you are getting 0% increases and you have to absorb inflation and other cost increases plus pay off our debt, it's getting tougher every year," hospital board chairman Gary Lounsbury said during a press conference Wednesday morning.
  • The hospital will also close four palliative-care beds.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • "It's another day where we are hearing about hospital budgets being balanced on the backs of nurses. This is several thousand hours of RN care that is being removed from this community."
  • Of the 53 positions to be eliminated, 28 will be registered nurses.
  • "We are working to decrease length of stay in that service, since it is significantly out of step with provincial benchmarks," PRHC spokesman Arnel Schiratti stated in an email Wednesday night. "By doing so we can treat the same number of patients with fewer beds. By moving to benchmarks four beds will no longer be needed as we treat the same number of patients."
  • "At the end of the day, there will be three potential layoffs. As this migrates over time, we see that (number) coming down," he said.
  • While registered nursing positions take the brunt of the cuts, Tremblay said overall the number of nurses employed at the hospital is actually going up.
  • There will be a bump in registered practical nurses from 204 in 2012-13 to 222 in 2013-14 and registered nursing positions will go from 711 to 755, the hospital said.
  • The cutbacks represent a 2.5% staffing decrease. PRHC currently employs about 2,070 people. The 2013-14 operating budget will be balanced, without surplus or deficit.
  • PRHC full-time employees average 10 sick days per year, costing $3.2 million. The leading Ontario hospitals in that category average only six days per year.
  • Sick days tend to lead to more overtime costs. In 2012/2013, PRHC paid out more than $1.9 million in overtime and the hospital is aiming for a 30% reduction.
  •  
    RNs bear brunt of latest cuts. 4 palliative beds cut, 28 RN jobs, 53 in total.
Irene Jansen

Eliminating Waste in US Health Care - - JAMA - 1 views

  • In just 6 categories of waste—overtreatment, failures of care coordination, failures in execution of care processes, administrative complexity, pricing failures, and fraud and abuse—the sum of the lowest available estimates exceeds 20% of total health care expenditures.
  • Obtaining savings directly—by simply lowering payments or paying for fewer services—seems the most obvious remedy.
  • Here is a better idea: cut waste.
  • ...16 more annotations...
  • The literature in this area identifies many potential sources of waste and provides a broad range of estimates of the magnitude of excess spending.
  • The Table shows estimates of the total cost of waste in each of these 6 categories both for Medicare and Medicaid and for all payers.
  • Failures of Care Delivery: the waste that comes with poor execution or lack of widespread adoption of known best care processes
  • this category represented between $102 billion and $154 billion in wasteful spending
  • Failures of Care Coordination: the waste that comes when patients fall through the slats in fragmented care.
  • represented between $25 billion and $45 billion in wasteful spending
  • Overtreatment: the waste that comes from subjecting patients to care that, according to sound science and the patients' own preferences, cannot possibly help them
  • represented between $158 billion and $226 billion in wasteful spending
  • Administrative Complexity
  • represented between $107 billion and $389 billion in wasteful spending
  • Pricing Failures: the waste that comes as prices migrate far from those expected in well-functioning markets, that is, the actual costs of production plus a fair profit.
  • US prices for diagnostic procedures such as MRI and CT scans are several times more than identical procedures in other countries.
  • represented between $84 billion and $178 billion in wasteful spending
  • Fraud and Abuse
  • represented between $82 billion and $272 billion in wasteful spending
  • Addressing the wedge designated “overtreatment,” for example, would require identifying specific clinical procedures, tests, medications, and other services that do not benefit patients and using a range of levers in policy, payment, training, and management to reduce their use in appropriate cases. The National Priorities Partnership program at the National Quality Forum has produced precisely such a list in cooperation with and with the endorsement of relevant medical specialty societies.
Irene Jansen

Internationally Educated Health Professionals: Workforce Integration and Retention :: L... - 0 views

  • Abstract It is essential that internationally educated healthcare professionals (IEHPs) residing in Canada re-enter and remain in their profession. To make the most of this important supply of healthcare professionals, it is vital to understand who IEHPs are, the challenges they face and how to facilitate their entry and integration into the workforce. In this article, after a summary of what is known of IEHPs who migrate to Canada, common problems of entry and integration into the workforce are discussed. Profession-specific challenges are considered, including how roles in certain professions vary globally and the importance of cultural and communication competencies. Resources to assist physicians and nurses are described and compared with those available for other professions. Finally, future possibilities and strategies for workforce integration are considered. Although the focus in this paper is on one province, the issues and strategies discussed are relevant to other provincial and international jurisdictions that are struggling with shortages and trying to capitalize on potential sources of workforce supply
  •  
    Healthcare papers 10(2) 2010:8-20
Govind Rao

Why this doctor is moving to Canada; Dysfunctional U.S. health-care system hard on doct... - 0 views

  • The Hamilton Spectator Wed May 13 2015
  • I'm a U.S. family physician who has decided to relocate to Canada. The hassles of working in the dysfunctional health care "system" in the U.S. have simply become too intense. I'm not alone. According to a physician recruiter in Windsor, during the past decade more than 100 U.S. doctors have relocated to her city alone. More generally, the Canadian Institute for Health Information reports that Canada has been gaining more physicians from international migration than it's been losing.
  • I'm moving to Canada because I'm tired of doing daily battle with the same adversary that my patients face - the private health insurance industry, with its frequent errors in processing claims (the American Medical Association reports that one of every 14 claims submitted to commercial insurers is paid incorrectly); outright denials of payment (one to five per cent); and costly paperwork that consumes about 16 per cent of physicians' working time, according to a recent journal study. I've also witnessed the painful and continual shifting of medical costs onto my patients' shoulders through rising co-payments, deductibles and other out-of-pocket expenses. According to a survey by the Commonwealth Fund, 66 million - 36 per cent of Americans - reported delaying or forgoing needed medical care in 2014 due to cost.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • My story is relatively brief. Six years ago, shortly after completing my residency in Rochester, N.Y., I opened a solo family medicine practice in what had become my adopted hometown. I had a vision of cultivating a practice where patients felt heard and cared for, and where I could provide a full-spectrum of family medicine care, including obstetrics. My practice embraced the principles of patient-centred collaborative care. It employed the latest in 21st-century technology. After five years of constant fighting with multiple private insurance companies in order to get paid, I ultimately made the heart-wrenching decision to close my practice. The emotional stress too great. My spirit was being crushed. It broke my heart to have to pressure my patients to pay the bills their insurance companies said they owed. Private insurance never covers the whole bill and doesn't kick in until patients have first paid down the deductible. For some this means paying thousands of dollars out-of-pocket before insurance ever pays a penny. But because I had my own business to keep solvent, I was forced to pursue the balance owed.
  • Doctors deal with this conundrum in different ways. A recent New York Times story described how an increasing number of doctors are turning away from independent practice to join large employer groups (often owned by hospital systems) in order to be shielded from this side of our system. About 60 per cent of family GPs are now salaried employees rather than independent practitioners. That was a temptation for me, too. But too often I've seen in these large, corporate physician practices that the personal relationship between doctor and patient gets lost. So I looked for alternatives. I spoke with other physicians, both inside and outside my specialty. We invariably ended up talking about the tumultuous time that the U.S. health care system is in - and the challenges physicians face in trying to achieve the twin goals of improved medical outcomes and reduced cost.
  • I knew Canada had largely resolved the problem of delivering affordable, universal care with a publicly-financed single-payer system. I also knew Canada's system operates more efficiently than the U.S. system, as outlined in a landmark paper in The New England Journal of Medicine. So I decided to look at Canadian health care more closely. I liked what I saw. I realized I did not have to sacrifice my family medicine career because of the dysfunctional system on our side of the border. In conversations with my husband, we decided we'd be willing to relocate our family so I could pursue the career in medicine that I love. I'll be starting and growing my own practice in Penetanguishene on the tip of Georgian Bay this autumn. I'm excited about resuming my practice, this time in a context that is not subject to the vagaries of backroom deals between monied, vested interests. I'm looking forward to being part of a larger system that values caring for the health of individuals, families and communities as a common good - where health care is valued as a human right.
  • I hope the U.S. will get there some day. I believe so. Perhaps Canada will help us find our way. Emily S. Queenan, MD, resides in Rochester, N.Y. She is an adviser with EvidenceNetwork.ca.
Govind Rao

introduction - gender & work database - 0 views

  • Prepared by Leah F. Vosko, GWD Director
  • The Modules: A Rationale The GWD is currently composed of six integrated and interactive modules on the following topics: precarious employment health care unions migration unpaid work technology
Govind Rao

Cuba: health lessons not under embargo - The Lancet - 0 views

  • Volume 385, No. 9962, p2, 3 January 2015
  • 2014 ended with a historic change in relations between Cuba and the USA. “After all, these 50 years have shown that isolation has not worked”, stated US President Barack Obama on Dec 17. Although issues around politics, freedom, and civil rights still stand and should not be overlooked, Obama pointed out, “Where we can advance shared interests, we will—on issues like health, migration, counterterrorism, drug trafficking and disaster response”. Obama cited health. With a life expectancy of 79 years, 67 doctors per 10 000 people (whereas the regional average is 21 per 10 000), and with hundreds of Cuban doctors now fighting Ebola in west Africa, health indeed does come to mind first when one thinks of Cuba.
Govind Rao

Medicare's safety valves - Infomart - 0 views

  • National Post Mon Mar 23 2015
  • When government monopolies fail to provide the level of service citizens expect, or when excessive regulations on an industry limits competition and drives up prices, people often seek a market-oriented solution that will provide the services they want at a price they are willing to pay. Uber offers a great example of how people are using technology to bypass the government's taxi oligopoly in many major cities. Although there is not yet an app that would allow Canadians to get a colonoscopy from a private practitioner, people in this country have, for decades, travelled abroad to bypass the long wait times that are endemic to the Canadian health-care system.
  • How many people are seeking medical treatment abroad? A new Fraser Institute study surveyed Canadian physicians to find out how many of their patients went out of country in search of timely care. It estimates that 52,513 people received medical care abroad in 2014, although the authors note that this estimate does not take into account those who left the country without first consulting their doctor here at home. And the number of Canadian medical tourists is growing, having risen from 41,838 in 2013. The reason may not be hard to find. A study released last year by the U.S.-based Commonwealth Fund ranked the health-care systems of 11 industrialized countries and placed Canada second to last overall. Interestingly, two countries that have similar systems to ours, the U.K. and Australia, ranked first and fourth respectively.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • he main difference is that although these countries have universally accessible health-care systems, they also allow people to receive private medical services by paying outof-pocket or purchasing insurance. Their systems result in better overall care, for two main reasons. First, competition from private hospitals and medical practices provides an incentive for the public system to improve. As the C.D. Howe Institute's Åke Blomqvist and Colin Busby argue in a policy paper released last month, in Canada, "lack of competition between provincial health insurance plans and privately financed medicine has lessened the pressure on publicsector managers and politicians to improve an inadequately performing system."
  • Having a parallel private alternative also helps reduce wait times in the public system. Last year, Canadians waited an average of 9.8 weeks to receive medically necessary treatments after seeing a specialist - three weeks longer than what most doctors consider to be "reasonable." In the Commonwealth Fund study, Canada ranked dead last in terms of "timeliness of care," while the U.K. came in third and Australia sixth. (The U.K. and Australia also ranked first and second respectively in terms of quality of care.) Fears of a mass migration of doctors into the private system are easily answered. In the U.K., doctors trained in public universities are required to work in the National Health Service (the public system) for at least two years before they can move into the private system. Doctors who receive NHS funding are also allowed to set up parallel private practices, but must work 40 hours a week for the NHS.
  • Fortunately, Canadian provinces have quite a bit of leeway to experiment with allowing more privately delivered medical services. As Mssrs. Blomqvist and Busby argue, "Although this is not widely understood, the [Canada Health Act] does not rule out transactions in which providers are paid privately for their services. There is also no prohibition on private insurance that covers the same services as those under the public plans, provided these services are supplied entirely independent of publicly funded services." Indeed, all that is needed is for provincial governments to take the initiative and remove some of their restrictions on private health services.
  • The health-care debate in this country has traditionally focused on comparing our system with that of the United States. Yet the truth is that we have much more in common with European and other industrialized countries. As many of these countries have shown us, it is possible to provide world-class health care that is accessible to all people, while allowing those who choose to pay for private services to do so here at home, rather than travelling overseas.
healthcare88

Intervenors decry Charter challenge of medicare - 0 views

  • CMAJ October 18, 2016 vol. 188 no. 15 First published September 19, 2016, doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5330
  • News Intervenors decry Charter challenge of medicare Steve Mertl + Author Affiliations Vancouver, BC Sanctioning doctors to practise in both public and private health care, and bill above the medicare fee schedule would lead to an inequitable, profit-driven system, warns a promedicare coalition opposing a Charter challenge of British Columbia laws.
  • Cambie Surgeries Corp., which operates private clinics, and co-plaintiffs, launched the case against the BC government and its Medicare Protection Act. “(T)he Coalition Intervenors are here to advocate for all of those British Columbians who rely on the public system, and whose right to equitable access to health care without regard to financial means or ability to pay — the very object of the legislation being attacked — would be undermined if the plaintiffs were to succeed,” lawyer Alison Latimer said in her written opening submitted Sept. 14 to the BC Supreme Court.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The intervenor coalition includes Canadian Doctors for Medicare, Friends of BC Medicare, Glyn Townson, who has AIDS, Thomas McGregor, who has muscular dystrophy, and family physicians Dr. Duncan Etches and Dr. Robert Woollard, both professors at the University of British Columbia. A second intervenor group representing four patients also warned that the Charter challenge would lead to an inequitable health system across Canada. “This case is indeed about the future of the public health care system, in its ideal and actual forms,” said the group’s lawyer Marjorie Brown, according to a report in The Globe and Mail. Cambie and its co-plaintiffs, who made their opening argument last week, say the BC law barring extra billing, so-called dual or blended practices and the use of private insurance for publicly covered services violates Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
  • A successful Charter challenge in BC would mean an inequitable health system, where those who can pay get priority service, states an intervenor coalition.
  • Moreover, they claim the prohibitions exacerbate the under-funded public system’s problems, especially waiting lists for various treatments and surgeries. Allowing a “hybrid” system would relieve the strain. The coalition brief, echoing the BC government’s lengthy opening argument, said there’s no evidence that creating a two-tier system would reduce wait times. But there is a risk of hollowing out the public system as resources migrate to the more lucrative private alternative. Those who couldn’t afford private insurance could still find themselves waiting for treatment, thus undermining the principles of universality and equity spelled out in the Canada Health Act, Latimer said in her submission. Latimer also questioned whether the legislation falls within the scope of the Charter, more often invoked to overturn criminal laws, not those with socio-economic objectives.
  • “This legislation is intended to protect the right to life and security of the person of all British Columbians, including the vulnerable and silent rights-holders whose equal access to quality health care depends upon the challenged protections,” Latimer stated. There’s also a risk of sapping the public system of not only doctors but nurses, lab technicians, administrators and others drawn to the more lucrative private market, the brief said. Dual practices could also foster “cream-skimming,” where private clinics handle simpler but profitable procedures, leaving complex cases to the public system. The British Columbia Anesthesiologists’ Society, intervening to support the challenge, will be making arguments later in the trial, which is due to last at least until February 2017. The federal government is expected to begin making arguments in several months.
1 - 10 of 10
Showing 20 items per page