Skip to main content

Home/ CUPE Health Care/ Group items tagged health policy

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Govind Rao

Job quality at record low; As more workers in Canada turn to part-time, low-wage jobs, ... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Fri Mar 6 2015
  • The rise of part-time, low-paying jobs and self-employment in Canada over the past 2 1/2 decades has lead to an irreversible decline in employment quality, according to a report from the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Job quality in Canada has been declining for 25 years and is now at a record low, CIBC said. Worse still, it's unlikely that low interest rates and a return of robust economic growth will reverse the trend. "Our measure of employment quality has been on clear downward trajectory over the past 25 years," CIBC deputy chief economist Benjamin Tal wrote in the report, released Thursday. "While the pace of the decline has slowed in recent years, the level of quality as measured by our index is currently at a record low - 15 per cent below the rate seen in the early 1990s and 10 per cent below the level seen in the early 2000s."
  • The CIBC Canadian Employment Quality Index measures the distribution of full- and part-time jobs, the split between self-employment and paid employment, and the compensation ranking of full-time paid employment jobs in more than 100 industry groups. The index, which uses January 1988 as a base year, has largely been in decline since 1990. On a year-over-year basis, it is down by 1.8 per cent. "The long-term trends of our quality components suggest that the decline in employment quality in Canada is more structural than cyclical," Tal wrote. The chief culprit is often seen as the growth in the number of part-time jobs, which have risen much faster than full-time employment since the 1980s, CIBC said. "The damage caused to
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • full-time employment during each recession was, in many ways, permanent," Tal wrote in the report. The findings come as no surprise to professors who study Canada's labour market. "There's been this idea that now that oil prices are low and the dollar is low and now we'll see these big plants come back to Canada. I think that's overly optimistic," said Mike Moffatt, assistant professor at the Richard Ivey School of Business at the University of Western Ontario. "The big takeaway from this is that the issues that we have in Canada and Ontario, in particular, aren't just recession-based. Policy-makers need to figure out other ways of economic growth and job growth that don't just assume those manufacturing jobs are coming back." The number of self-employed workers rose four times faster than the number of paid employees during the year-ended January 2015, CIBC noted in the report.
  • While self-employment can provide flexibility and other advantages, it is considered to be of lower quality because on average it pays less than salaried positions. The number of low-paying jobs has risen faster than the number of mid-paying jobs, which in turn has risen faster than the number of high-paying jobs. In the last year, the number of low-paying full-time positions rose twice as fast as the number of high-paying positions, CIBC said. Over the past decade, wages in high-paying sectors rose almost twice as fast as wages in low-paying sectors. "In other words, the fastest-growing segment of the labour market is also the one with the weakest bargaining power," Tal wrote. Unemployment insurance, the Canada Pension Plan, as well as health care, education, and child care, were built to suit the labour market from the 1960s and 1970s, when a single breadwinner had a good-paying job with steady income, hours, and benefits that could support an entire family, said Wayne Lewchuk, a professor at McMaster University who has researched precarious employment.
  • "I think we're coming to terms with the fact that we have the wrong institutions for a modern labour market," Lewchuk said. "If we get the institutions right, then these people who are precarious, they become flexible employees. That's not necessarily a bad thing, and the supports are around them make this a viable way of operating." Lewchuk points to the public discourse around the perils of precarious employment, as well as the proposed Ontario pension plan, the Canadian Skills Training and Employment Coalition, and worker protection legislation passed last year, as evidence of change, Lewchuk said. "It has taken 20 or 30 years for us to get here. It will take that kind of time to move away. But I think the momentum has shifted," Lewchuk said. "There are all kinds of reasons to be optimistic but it's going to take time and it's going to be through struggle."
Govind Rao

CFHI - Northern and Remote Collaboration - 0 views

  • The Northern and Remote (NR) Collaboration provides an opportunity for decision makers, leaders, policy makers and practitioners to build leadership and improvement capacity by networking, comparing innovative solutions and sharing success stories. Healthcare service providers working in northern and remote areas of Canada face unique challenges with developing, implementing and evaluating effective and sustainable solutions in these regions. The collaboration aims to improve the health status of people living in northern and remote regions of Canada. This collaboration was until recently called the Northern, Rural or Remote (NRoR) Collaboration. Watch this video from the 2014 NRoR Roundtable to learn about the benefits of joining the new Northern and Remote Collaboration:
Govind Rao

The non-Hillary hope of U.S. progressives; Bernie Sanders, a democratic socialist, hasn... - 0 views

  • Toronto Star Tue Feb 10 2015
  • Angry speech complete, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders, who is giving "serious thought" to running for president, sat down to take questions from the Brookings Institution audience. "No one would accuse you of being 'Morning in America' with your presentation today," pundit Mark Shields began, referring to the sunny Ronald Reagan campaign ad.
  • "My wife often tells me that after I speak we have to pass out the tranquilizers and the anti-suicide kits," Sanders said. "I've been trying to be more cheerful!" White hair askew, suit jacket creased, Sanders, a 73-year-old whose Brooklyn accent occasionally turns Obama into "Obamer," looks and sounds the part of doomsday prophet. On Monday, he said that America is either on the road to "oligarchy" or already there, that the conservative Koch brothers might have successfully purchased the country with campaign donations, and that resistance to "the billionaire class" from a grassroots candidate like him might be futile.
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Sanders is not even a registered Democrat: Though he caucuses with the party, he has sat as an independent since he was elected to Congress in 1990. He self-identifies as a democratic socialist. In an Iowa church basement in December, he called for "a political revolution in this country." Not the stuff of major-party nominees. But no one else with sterling progressive credentials appears to possess the martyrdom instinct to stand in front of the Hillary Clinton express.
  • If you had two million people, a phenomenal response, putting in $100 bucks, that's $200 million. That is 20 per cent of what the Koch brothers themselves are prepared to spend. Can we take that on? I don't know the answer," he said. "Maybe the game is over. Maybe they have bought the United States government. Maybe there is no turning back. Maybe we've gone over the edge. I don't know. I surely hope not." This man could be progressive Democrats' last great 2016 hope.
  • A small but vocal effort to draft Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the most formidable left-leaning Democrat, has shown no sign of accomplishing anything. Warren would be a long-shot. Sanders may be a no-shot. But his presence in the debate could at least drag Clinton to the left on economic policy. And some activists believe his candour on the gap between rich and poor, which he described Monday as "grotesque and growing," would keep him afloat.
  • "Any candidate who speaks up as aggressively and as forthrightly as Sen. Sanders has on the growing income inequality in this country is a viable candidate. Income inequality will be the defining issue of the 2016 election," said Neil Sroka, communications director for Democracy for America, a political action committee founded by former candidate Howard Dean. Democracy for America is trying to convince Warren to enter the race. She keeps saying no. Sroka said the group is supportive of a Sanders candidacy even if Warren gets to yes.
  • "I think having more candidates in the 2016 Democratic primary talking about income inequality issues ensures that every single candidate has to talk about those issues," he said. Much of the recession-era country has come around to Sanders's anti-elite fury. He said Monday that "the business model of Wall Street is fraud and deception," demonstrating a populist frankness resonant with the segment of the Democratic base uneasy with Clinton's coziness with big donors.
  • Sanders offered a 12-point prescription for change. He called for a doubling of the federal minimum wage to "at least" $15 per hour, $1 trillion in infrastructure spending, repealing NAFTA, Europe-like free university tuition, and a Canada-like single-payer health-care system that insures everyone. Obamacare, he said, has been only a "modest success." He said he has seen "a lot of sentiment that enough is enough, that we need fundamental changes." Lest anyone get too excited, he added a caveat. "On the other hand, I also understand political realities," he said. "And that is: When you take on the billionaire class, it ain't easy."
Govind Rao

Union decries doom scenario of New Brunswick - Infomart - 0 views

  • Times & Transcript (Moncton) Fri Feb 20 2015
  • The Canadian Union of Public Employees in New Brunswick says the province is exaggerating its fiscal situation in order to slash public services and sell public assets. "Four years ago, the Alward government started their term in office with alarmist warnings prepared by Don Drummond that the province would soon run deficits of $2 billion a year," Daniel L�g�re, president of CUPE NB, said Wednesday. "This was highly exaggerated based on faulty assumptions. The budget could have been balanced without cuts to programs, largely by reversing regressive tax cuts."
  • Now the Gallant Liberal government is doing the same thing despite deficit projections that are not as dire as they had predicted, and the Liberals will get the same negative results for their efforts, L�g�re told a news conference in Moncton.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • "Once again the New Brunswick government is exaggerating the province's fiscal problems to impose austerity and spending cuts going along with those who alleged that New Brunswick will be over the cliff if it didn't start to cut spending. It's absurd but it's just the type of scaremongering they use to force through cuts to public services and sales of public assets - because they know the public wouldn't stand for it unless they were spooked," L�g�re said.
  • CUPE economist Toby Sanger told the meeting that the new government is committing the same mistakes former governments made, but expecting radically better results.
  • To repeat the same mistakes of their predecessors and continue with these policies is, at best, ignorant or stupid," Sanger said.
  • Austerity has failed here in the past, as it has around the world, Sangster said, according to a prepared copy of his and L�g�re's remarks. CUPE believes the province's structural program review asks the wrong questions when it asks what the province should stop doing; instead it should ask what other things it can do to increase revenues and grow the economy. The union suggests rolling back earlier cuts to corporate tax rates, imposing higher taxes on high-income earners and closing tax loopholes to generate $400 million more per year. Boosting revenue by 1.5 per cent would put the province in a surplus position, CUPE claims.
  • The provincial government's strategic revue is looking at ways to cut costs and increase revenues for the expected spring budget and the 2016 budget. Minister of Health Victor Boudreau, who is in charge of the review, had no comment.
Govind Rao

Civil servants need fair wages - Infomart - 0 views

  • National Post Thu Feb 19 2015
  • Re: "Fat public sector paycheques," Charles Lammam and Niels Veldhuis, Feb. 18 Funded by right-wing corporate interests, the Fraser Institute's latest in a series of distorted studies on public sector compensation only aims to spur animosity between Canadian workers. This is a troubling distraction from the real issues of income inequality.
  • CUPE's own study, B attle of the Wages, shows a small overall premium for public sector workers - less than two percent - when comparing workers in similar occupations. But this is entirely due to a smaller pay gap for women in the public sector than in the private sector. The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternative's own analysis, Narrowing the Gap, shows that higher public sector wages are attributed to higher wages for workers most discriminated against in the private sector. This analysis shows women, radicalized and Aboriginal workers are the ones seeing higher, and much fairer, wages in the public sector.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Driving down the compensation of public sector workers won't address the growing income inequality gap between working people and the richest Canadians. We need real action that will help all Canadian workers - public and private sector alike. Affordable and accessible child care, strengthened public health care, an expanded Canada Pension Plan that will give millions of Canadians a secure retirement income, and building an economy that is based on good jobs with fair wages for all.
  • Paul Moist, National President, Canadian Union of Public Employees
Govind Rao

Base MRI clinic policy on Alberta's experience - Infomart - 0 views

  • The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) Fri Oct 24 2014
  • Meili is a family physician in Saskatoon and vice-chair of Canadian Doctors for Medicare. Premier Brad Wall took to Twitter last week to ask: "Is it time to allow people to pay for their own private MRIs in Saskatchewan like they can do in Alberta?" This came after a radio talk show during which he'd received a call from a patient who's been waiting three months for an MRI scan. This is one of many Saskatchewan patients who are, understandably, frustrated by long waits for essential imaging services. It is a real problem. For that reason we should be very wary of false solutions and look first to evidence before rhetoric takes over. The best place to look for that evidence is the province Wall references as a model. Many Saskatchewan residents have sought out care in Alberta's private MRI clinics, giving the impression that the experiment there has been a success. When we take a closer look, it turns out things are not so wildly rosy in the land of private MRIs. Perhaps the most surprising fact is that the wait list for MRI scans in Alberta, rather than having been shortened by the presence of private imaging clinics, is actually the longest in Canada. According to the Canadian Institute for Health Information, patients in Alberta can wait from 87 days to 247 days for a scan, compared with 28 to 88 in Saskatchewan.
Govind Rao

No to extra-billing - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Fri Mar 20 2015
  • Re An Affordable Step Toward True Universality (March 19): Cherry-picking a system here and there to compare Canada unfavorably is a fun pastime for those keen on privatizing medicare. This time, Konrad Yakabuski argues we should ape the English system as it allows people to buy private care. But English doctors in the public system are paid salaries and are government employees. Canadian doctors are paid on a fee-for-service basis, and this will not change any time soon. Most likely for the Canadian system, if we allow extra-billing, as Mr. Yakabuski argues, nearly every Canadian will be paying out of pocket for care. Colleen Flood, University of Ottawa Research Chair in Health Law and Policy
Govind Rao

New debate needed on Canada-EU trade deal | - 0 views

  • It is time for Canada to lead in re-evaluating what type of trade agreements are needed for this century.
  • By HOWARD MANN PUBLISHED : Wednesday, March 9, 2016
  • While the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) text was in long-term legal scrub, it had taken a back seat to discussions over the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPP) concluded by the Conservative government during the last election campaign. The TPP has attracted vocal opposition from very diverse sources in Canada, including major innovators, labour unions and organizations focused on achieving sustainable development. With the release now of the final CETA text—the trade agreement between Canada and the EU—new debate is needed on it as well.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • Included in the statement released by Canada and the EU to mark the end of the legal review was the announcement that the investor-state arbitration model long entrenched in Canada’s international agreements has been replaced by a system that more closely resembles an international court. The new court-like system includes independent judges, an appeals process and, generally, more transparency and predictability. There can be little doubt that this is a significant improvement over the previous arbitration process.
  • Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland, after referring to CETA as a gold-plated trade agreement, stated that with these changes, “Our dispute resolution process is brought up in this agreement to the 21st century democratic standards that Canadians demand.” This view begs two questions. First, why have a new international court that can override domestic courts that already meet the democratic expectations of Canadians? Second, does the rest of the agreement also reflect 21st century democratic needs and standards?
  • The investment chapter and its international court will still give foreign investors special rights and remedies to challenge government actions that they see as unfavourable to them. This gives one economic stakeholder a significant legal advantage over all other actors and stakeholders in the economy. It will allow this one class of economic actor to circumvent domestic courts by going directly to an international court whose role is to apply international law to protect their investor rights.
  • The justification for this is that these mechanisms will attract new investors to new places. However, this fails to stand up to empirical evidence developed over the past 10 to 15 years that shows these types of special rights for investors have no impact on investment flows. In short, there is no payoff for governments that put their countries at risk of exposure to international dispute settlement processes that circumvent domestic courts.
  • So do the other provisions of CETA reflect 21st century goals and standards? In both the TPP and CETA, it is the chapters that don’t directly relate to trade that make the agreements ‘comprehensive.’ It is these rules that are becoming increasingly broad and ever more favourable to large economic actors.
  • Let’s take the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) rules, for example, which go farther to favour European drug manufacturers over Canadian manufacturers, and Canada’s health care system, than any previous IPR agreement. There is also the chapter on “Domestic Regulation” that goes farther in limiting government rights to review and regulate new investments in every sector of the economy than any previous treaty has gone. The CETA also features a long list of limitations on government’s ability to maximize the value that Canadians derive from foreign investment, including such future projects as Ontario’s ring of fire for mining.
  • These non-trade chapters will contribute to the ongoing growth of legal and economic inequality of average citizens and small and medium-size businesses compared to the large economic actors. These chapters simply replicate and deepen provisions from 10, 15 and 20 years ago, or more, with no new assessment of their impacts in today’s world, on climate change responses, or on the needs of sustainable development.
  • The UN Sustainable Development Goals adopted in 2015 provide a framework to realign the goals of trade and economic agreements for the future rather than just replicate the measures of the past, measures that continue to work against sustainable development needs. With the growing concerns over TPP, the inconsistent approaches between TPP and CETA on key democratic principles, and the obvious need to prioritize climate responses over trade policy, it is time for Canada to lead in re-evaluating what type of trade agreements are needed for this century.
  • Canada now has a unique opportunity to step back, reflect, and then return to lead global trade-law into a sustainable development era.
  • Howard Mann is the senior international law adviser with the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Govind Rao

Drug prices expected to jump as result of trade deal - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Globe and Mail Mon Dec 7 2015
  • The intellectual-property provisions in the Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement will drive up global drug prices and make it harder to treat diseases in developing countries, Medecins sans Frontieres (Doctors Without Borders) says. A month after the final text of the TPP was released, the medical humanitarian organization has completed its analysis of the portions of the massive trade pact that will affect drug costs.
  • Despite changes from earlier leaked versions of the text, there are still serious problems, Judit Rius, MSF's U.S. legal policy adviser, said. "This is catastrophic. This is very negative. The impact is going to be at multiple levels," Ms. Rius said in an interview. "First of all, it is going to delay access to generic competition [for brand-name drugs], which is a proven intervention to reduce the price of medicines."
  • ...6 more annotations...
  • Ms. Rius said there were six problem areas - from MSF's perspective - in the early leaked versions of the TPP. Three have been eliminated in the final text, although she said some of those were "absurd" in the first place. Among them was a provision that would have made it illegal to oppose a patent before it was granted and another that would have forced governments to allow surgical techniques to be patented. There are three key remaining problem provisions, according to the MSF analysis. One would allow pharmaceutical companies to "evergreen" their product patents, essentially making small changes to a drug's use to extend its protection from competition. Another would extend patent protection if there are delays in regulatory approval of a new product.
  • More broadly, allowing greater monopoly protection for brand-name drug makers will diminish innovation at other firms, Ms. Rius said. "If you are trying to develop a pediatric formulation of a product, if you are trying to combine different pills into one pill, ... if you are trying to improve a medicine and create a second generation, all of that technology and knowledge is going to be protected by secondary patents." The final text of the sweeping trade pact, which has been in the works for eight years, was released in early November. Canada is one of 12 countries that have negotiated the pact, although it was the former Conservative government that signed on. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said his government will wait for parliamentary hearings on the TPP before deciding on ratification. Each country has to ratify the agreement before it comes into effect.
  • For generic drug makers, she said, the TPP will create additional legal barriers that will get in the way of making new products, and that will stunt the industry. The TPP will actually raise drug prices, especially in developing countries, she said, and this "will affect our capacity, and the capacity of the ministries of health with whom we work, to scale up treatment programs and reach as many people as needed."
  • A third would allow developers of certain advanced drugs - called biologics - to keep their clinical data private for up to eight years. That would make it much tougher for competitors to create similar drugs, or at least delay that from happening. This "data exclusivity" rule would be new for some of the countries that are part of the TPP group, although Canada already has a similar provision in place. Indeed, many of the provisions of the TPP are already part of the Canadian scene, at least in some form, said trade lawyer Larry Herman, of Herman & Associates in Toronto. The former Conservative government had said the TPP was "in line" with Canada's existing patent laws, and this appears to be true from his read of that part of the text, Mr. Herman said.
  • Still, he said, from a global perspective "there is no doubt that the agreement increases patent protection and enhances the monopoly rights of the patent owner." From the perspective of Canada's generic drug industry, the TPP has to be looked at in conjunction with the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between Canada and the European Union, said Jim Keon, president of the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association.
  • CETA, which has not yet taken effect, would extend patent protection for drugs and cut into the business of Canadian generic drug makers - thus boosting drug costs - Mr. Keon said. But it also contains some specific protection for the generic industry to mitigate that impact. It is not clear yet whether the TPP will allow those mitigating measures to be implemented in Canada, he said. And because of the immense complexity of the TPP, "you've got all sorts of potential for misinterpretation here," Mr. Keon added.
Govind Rao

MDs oppose allowing paying for private MRIs - Infomart - 0 views

  • The Daily News (Nanaimo) Wed Dec 16 2015
  • The organization representing Saskatchewan doctors says it's concerned that the government's decision to allow people to pay privately for MRIs is a hasty policy.
  • A letter to physicians from the president of the Saskatchewan Medical Association says it opposes the move and told Health Minister Dustin Duncan that at the end of October. Dr. Mark Brown says the legislation allowing people to pay privately for MRIs runs contrary to the fundamental principle of medicare. "We really believe that a patient accessing a test should be based on a need, rather than the ability to pay. That's the bottom line," Brown said Tuesday in a phone interview with The Canadian Press. A briefing note attached to the Dec. 4 letter says creating dual access to MRI scans does not reduce surgical wait times, and Brown suggested it could lead to queue-jumping for surgery.
Govind Rao

Budget 2016: Where will Canada's seniors live? - Policy Options - 0 views

  • Ensuring affordable housing is necessary to divert demand from higher cost health care and this requires well-planned adaptations and investments.
  • Nicole F. Bernier March 24, 2016 
  • The good news for Canada’s aging population is that the federal government in its 2016 budget announced that it will develop a national housing strategy, double the current federal funding in affordable housing (to $1.5 billion) and support the construction, repair and adaptation of affordable housing for seniors.
« First ‹ Previous 561 - 571 of 571
Showing 20 items per page