This page is designed to help you write appropriate learning outcomes when developing and revising your modules and programmes, and when devising assessment tasks. It explains:
* what learning outcomes are
*
the learning outcomes process
*
the benefits of using learning outcomes
*
how to use learning outcomes at programme level
*
how to use learning outcomes at module level
*
how to write learning outcomes
*
how to link outcomes to assessment
What is Constructive Alignment?
Constructive Alignment, a term coined by John Biggs (Biggs, 1999) is one of the most influential ideas in higher education. It is the underpinning concept behind the current requirements for programme specification, declarations of Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) and assessment criteria, and the use of criterion based assessment.
There are two parts to constructive alignment:
* Students construct meaning from what they do to learn.
* The teacher aligns the planned learning activities with the learning outcomes.
The basic premise of the whole system is that the curriculum is designed so that the learning activities and assessment tasks are aligned with the learning outcomes that are intended in the course. This means that the system is consistent.
Engaged Learning: Enabling Self-Authorship and Effective Practice
David C. Hodge, Marcia B. Baxter Magolda, and Carolyn A. Haynes
There is now broad consensus that higher education must extend beyond content-based
knowledge to encompass intellectual and practical skills, personal and social
responsibility, and integrative learning. The college learning outcomes needed for
success in 21
st
century life include critical thinking, a coherent sense of self, intercultural
maturity, civic engagement, and the capacity for mutual relationships. Yet, research
suggests that college students are struggling to achieve these outcomes in part because
skills needed to succeed in college are not those needed to succeed upon graduation.
One reason for this gap is that these college learning outcomes require complex
developmental capacities or "self-authorship" that higher education is not currently
designed to promote.
'Constructive alignment' starts with the notion that the learner constructs his or her own learning through relevant learning activities. The teacher's job is to create a learning environment that supports the learning activities appropriate to achieving the desired learning outcomes. The key is that all components in the teaching system - the curriculum and its intended outcomes, the teaching methods used, the assessment tasks - are aligned to each other. All are tuned to learning activities addressed in the desired learning outcomes. The learner finds it difficult to escape without learning appropriately.
Programme specifications
A programme specification is a concise description of the intended learning outcomes from a higher education programme, and how these outcomes can be achieved and demonstrated.
QAA has produced guidelines to offer help and guidance to those preparing programmes specifications. They draw on the experience of others in a range of subjects and institutions who have already prepared programme specifications.
Educational Research and Evaluation at Alverno College
In 1976, the college formally established an office of educational research and evaluation that would investigate a series of questions at the behest of the faculty, with special attention to linking the outcomes of college to the curriculum,establishing the validity of assessment techniques and the assessment process,
and demonstrating the link between college-learned abilities and alumnae performance in the world of work, personal life, service, and citizenship.
Our initial concerns were for assessment activities that operated at the level of individual students and were integral to their learning. (For additional information, go to Student Assessment-as-Learning.)
Alongside this use, assessment can also be an instructor's tool for improving learning or a policy tool for planning and improvement. We have gradually developed a program of assessments that operates at the levels of individual student, program, curriculum, and institution.
In this context, educational research and evaluation are part of a dynamic learning system based on the educational principles and values underlying Alverno's mission and supported by structures that ensure coherence and continuing improvement. One such structure is the Research and Evaluation Council, made up of senior faculty, staff, and administrators. However, responsibility for review of program, curriculum, and institution-wide effectiveness lies with departments faculty and staff across this institution.
The Knowledge Media Laboratory works to create a future in which communities of teachers, faculty, programs, and institutions collectively advance teaching and learning by exchanging their educational knowledge, experiences, ideas, and reflections by taking advantage of various technologies and resources.
The KML is currently working with its partners, including Carnegie Foundation programs, to achieve the following goals:
* To develop digital (or electronic) tools and resources that help to make knowledge of effective teaching practices and educational transformation efforts visible, shareable and reusable.
* To explore synergy among various technologies to better support the scholarship of teaching and learning.
* To build the capacity for faculty and teachers independently to take advantage of information and communications technologies that enable them to re-examine, rethink and represent teaching and student learning, and to share the outcomes in an effective and efficient way.
* To sustain communities of practice engaged in collaboratively improving teaching and student learning by building common areas to exchange knowledge and by building repositories for the representation of effective practice.
Promoting Self-Authorship to Promote Liberal Education
Marcia B. Baxter Magolda, Miami University
1
______________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
Contemporary college learning outcomes such as critical thinking and intercultural maturity
require transformative learning. Self-authorship-the capacity to internally generate one's beliefs,
values, identity, and relationships-is a necessary foundation for transformational learning. This
essay describes the evolution of self-authorship and the conditions that promote it based on a 22-
year study of adult learning and development. Learning partnerships model how to promote self-
authorship and enable learners to take charge of their learning.
__________________________________________________________
Constructive alignment
Constructive alignment of learning outcomes to assessment methods
The following resources are available:
Overview paper
Professor Mike Osborne, University of Stirling and Workshop Director
Report on the event and areas for future development and enhancement
Professor Mike Osborne
Keynote address: Aligning assessment with long-term learning needs
Professor David Boud, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
Powerpoint slides | PDF version
Case study 1: Assessment on the TQFE program- a case study of constructive alignment
Dr Iddo Oberski, University of Stirling
Powerpoint slides | PDF version
Draft paper - Word version | PDF version
Keynote address: Developing aligned courses
Sue Drew, Sheffield Hallam University
Powerpoint slides | PDF version
Draft paper - Word version | PDF version
Enhancing Learning Using Generic and Specific
Aspects of Knowledge Formation
Peter Petocz
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
Peter.Petocz@uts.edu.au
Anna Reid
Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia
Anna.Reid@mq.edu.au
Abstract: Recognising and understanding the diverse ways that students learn is an important step in setting up effective environments for learning. A traditional way of getting this information is to observe the quality of assessed work and classroom interactions. An alternative and more direct method is to actually ask students to tell you about their own learning. While some students will be less successful than others in articulating their ideas, an overall picture will emerge of the variety of ways in which students understand what it means to learn. Such an approach has been used to investigate students' experience of learning in a variety of contexts. One practical effect of this line of enquiry has been the discovery of the dichotomy between teacher focused, content orientations to learning associated with a surface approach to learning and student focused, learning orientations associated with a deep approach to learning. These qualitatively different conceptions of learning result in discernible differences in learning outcomes. While some aspects of learning seem to be universal, others depend on the context of learning. In this paper, we look at two parallel studies of students' conceptions of learning in statistics and in music, areas quite different both in content and traditional methods of pedagogy. Research in these and other academic disciplines suggests that there is a strong relation between students' (and teachers') perception of professional work and their conceptions of their discipline and learning within that discipline. We discuss how this 'Professional Entity' is apparent in statistics and music, and how an appreciation of the Professional Entity can help teachers enhance their students' learning in other