Fabulous discussion by Siemens on how their DALMOOC that started recently was designed to solve certain problems such as the
1. students floundering for lack of timely support
2. Learners having limited engagement in developing knowledge together
3. Learners not getting to know each other
4. Availability of MOOC resources after course is finished
5. Lack of adaptivity of content for learners to start where they are and proceed with their interests
Learners often select and pursue their own learning. Constructivist principles acknowledge that real-life learning is messy and complex. Classrooms which emulate the 'fuzziness' of this learning will be more effective in preparing learners for life-long learning." (Siemens, 2004)
major criticism of the cMOOC is based on the free-form nature
Students have to manage their own time, find their own resources, and structure their own learning.
navigating the chaos and making learning decisions is the lesson in a cMOOC.
21st century literacies, and digital literacies.
connectivity with people worldwide
constant flow of information
Framework for 21st Century Learning, which addresses several dimensions of this new type of learning, including core skills of collaboration, creativity, communication and critical thinking, and supporting skills such as workplace skills, information media skills, and the traditional core types of literacy and numeracy.
literacies specific to the digital medium itself
Mozilla Foundation
Web Literacy Map
Three major types of skills are identified: exploring, building and connecting.
previously under-represented function of sociality and connection.
The theory of knowledge underlying the creation of the cMOOC suggests that learning is not based on the idea of remembering content, nor even the acquisition of specific skills or dispositions, but rather, in engaging in experiences that support and aid in recognition of phenomena and possibilities in the world.
Cognitive dissonance is what creates learning experiences.
Excellent comparison of xMOOC and cMOOC and justification of cMOOC by who else, the cMOOC creator himself, Stephen Downes, February 11, 2015. Highly recommend it.
This is a chapter from a book written by the Ed Techie guy Martin Weller. What is interesting is how he detailed the new methods he used to write his most recent book. Many of the sources and practices that he engaged in for writing the second book did not even exist six years before when he finished writing his first book. These new aids include ready e-journal access, Delicious/social bookmarking, blogs, Youtube, Wikipedia, Slideshare, Scribd, Cloudwords and other sites, his own blog, social network especially twitter, Google alerts, etc. I am not sure how this relates to MOOCs and open landscape learning except he has so much more to manage, and gain from, in having a well developed dashboard of tools for seeking, sensing, and sharing.
interesting blogpost by John Sui Fai Mak, 3.29.13 on mentoring in MOOCs and networked environments. Brings up how much control a mentor should/could have on an independent learner who is either proceeding within an organizational or network construct online.
Wonderful HoTEL (Holistic Approach to Technology Enhanced Learning) visualization of learning theories from key concepts, to learning paradigms or 'world views,' learning theorists, and scientific disciplines, from Edudemic.com.
The online learning facilitator role that we are most familiar with functions primarily in communities of practice, social constructivist settings, and connectivist networks including MOOCs
Virtually Foolproof blog on Ender's Game and Cognitive, Collaborative, and Collective Learning, January 23, 2012.
Remarkable blog provoked in part by Dave Snowden's presentation at the Change MOOC, week of January 16, 2011 on what kind of learning is required in different situations.
A blog titled "Inside the Ivory Tower" about teaching musings.
This blog brings up the issue of cost in teaching and learning, i.e., the online courses that this professor designs and teaches are often shared by students with non-enrolled learners. The nonenrollees get the materials but not the camaraderie in the online classroom or credential or tutoring that completing this class at the instituion under the teacher's guidance provides enrolled students.
The professor would like to share his/her knowledge with the world but his/her reimbursement package is based solely on the # of enrolled students. He is still paying for his own higher education and that of two children, and soon, a third child. What is fair use in this situation when the teacher is just getting by economically himself/herself?
It begs the question: How can open learning initiatives that have started at MIT, Carnegie Mellon, etc. be emulated at state universities or other less well endowed settings?
Further, how can professional associations offer MOOCs or COOLS when they are not capitalized to do so?
Change MOOC blog "On Brain Rewiring and Speed of Access" by Multilitteratus Incognitus, January 31, 2012.
An amusing view that I find myself responding to positively on the assertions being made about the advent of the internet and connectivism and connected learning.
Stephen Downes is the guest speaker in the YouTube video and talks about the future of education. It is about an hour and half, but is interesting in getting his future view. Of interest to us is how he view of what he does: philosopher, journalist, technologist, educator. He calls himself a philosophical educator and looks at learning from epistomology, not educational learning theory.
Very very interesting--a year ago we talked about a learning concierge service in the studio. And look at Jane Hart's post published in July 2013 about how we need to provide such a service for people to take charge of their learning.
She mentions towards the end of her post that this could be an outsourced function and then shares how she does it. Look at the link to her page describing the service here-- http://learningconcierge.co.uk/about/
She is offering a workshop, too, and one may join her free learning concierge practice group now.
Will also share with Change MOOC for Brenda to see.
Amazon reviews of The Extended Mind collection of essays edited by Richard Menary and how far an accessible, reliable, and fully trustworthy object can "produce effects/results that are sufficiently comparable to those of components of the natural (internal, biological, original, classic) mind; in essence, it's about multiple realizability/functionalism."
The examination of the extended mind, to me, relates to connectivism learning theory in how we expand our minds by belonging to learning networks that exponentially increase our knowledge or access to it through objects or people sharing their understanding.
This paper written by George Siemens in 2008 on Learning in Networks raises issues very similar to those we are raising in our discussion.
Google Scholar, Scopus, and open access journals offer increased access to academic resources; an extension to more informal approaches
such as regular internet search and Wikipedia. Social software (blogs, wikis, social bookmarking, instant
messaging, Skype, Ning) provide opportunities for learners to create, dialogue about, and disseminate
information. But what becomes of the teacher? How do the practices of the educator change in
networked environments, where information is readily accessible? How do we design learning when
learners may adopt multiple paths and approaches to content and curriculum? How can we achieve
centralized learning aims in decentralized environments? This paper will explore the shifting role of
educators in networked learning, with particular emphasis on curatorial, atelier, concierge, and
networked roles of educators, in order to assist learners in forming diverse personal learning networks
for deep understanding of complex fields.
Article in MindShift, KQED, April 24, 2012 by Nathan Miton.
Fabulous because it recognizes that content is one leg of learning stool.
Excerpt:
But at such a huge scale, what are the digital methods of teaching that work best? Philipp Schmidt, founder of the free online university P2PU, preaches three building blocks: community, recognition and content.
Endorsement of peer learning potential
Excerpt:
The Stanford professors readily admit that some of the students who participated in their online courses provided their peers with deeper, more comprehensive answers than they were able to.
The exponential explosion in opportunities for learning.
Excerpt:
in the past 10 years I've heard people say campus-based education better look out, that this will be threatening to their business model, and I've never really felt that until the last six months. The pace of change in open education is qualitatively different than it was even a few months ago."
A new breed of digital pedagogy/andragogy/heutagogy
Excerpt:
"We probably haven't fully made the transition to digitally native pedagogies and learning approaches," Carson said. "The first generation of distance learning is basically an attempt to move the classroom online, and I think that part of the scalable learning of these massive courses is the breakdown of that model."
Weaknesses of Online Learning described on the Illinois Online Network website, 2012. It offers the unsupported view below that 20 is the maximum number of students that could be accommodated in an online class without losing the interactive elements. I disagree.
Levels of Synergy
Online learning has its most promising potential in the
high synergy represented by active dialog among the participants, one of the most important sources of learning in a Virtual Classroom. However, in larger classes (20 or more students), the synergy level starts to shift on the learning continuum until it eventually becomes independent study to accommodate the large
class. At this point, dialog is limited as well as interaction among
participants and the facilitator. The medium is not being used to its greatest potential."