After I read this peice of work i was able to understand the concept of the rhetorical term "goal". With in the web site were multiple strategies i could use to interpret the term (goal). The website not only gave different strategies but it also broke those different strategies into a step by step format that made the reading easier and clearer to understand. Because this website is very well organized and provides detailed information i belevie that this site would be very useful. I believe that this website is creditable because it was written and published by a very well educated and highly qualified man named, Samuel G. Freedman. The information was also published at Columbia University where Sauel Freedman is a professor. therefore i think that the author of this material and where the material origanated from makes this URL very creditable. Goal: Strategies for analyzing the rhetorical situation (Spring 2005). Cornell University. Retreived November 13, 2009 from wrt.syr.edu/670/downloads/.../StrategiesforAnalyzingtheRh.doc

After reading this PDF file i was able to understand the rhetorical situation even better than before. I like this link because it gave examples and visual aids that help me understand rhetorical situation. Therefore i think this site is good.

The term proofreading became very clear after reading this website. the website not only defined the term but it also gave examples of proofreading and tips that would help with the proofreading strategy as well. The website aslo seemed to be very creditable because it was published at the University of North Carolina.

After reading this URL i was able to understand the term editing. The website also gave reference to the term proofreading as well. I believe that the information provided was very creditable because the information was published at the Colorado State University.

After reading this URL i was able to understand the concept of drafting even better than i already did. the information was very clear and i found it to be very useful. The IRL was also very creditable because it was reference to have been published at the University of South Hampton.

The inforamtion provided about the word genre was not provided in a website nor a power point but in a PDF file in this link. I beleive that the information is good however because the term genre is not the only rhetoric term provided in stead there is an entire list of terms and their definitions. There fore i belive that this site is good.

This website was very good for the term revising. However the website did appear to look a little older than all other modern websites it still obtained some really useful information. The website was able to defin the term and give examples of the term. the website also provided tip that made it easier to understand the term and its meaning. Although the website looked to be old and out dated the author however did seem to be very knowledgable which there fore made this site creditable. The author of the website was A.E. Lipkewhich, Westmont Schools (Edmonton Public Schools).

This URL did not come in the form of a website but instead a power point. This power point made the writing process easier to understand. The term that was most clear for me to understand was "prewriting. The power point made this term easy to understand becsue it showed examples of prewriting and different ways a person could brainstorm their indeas. However the power point did not have an author labeled. But i do believe that the information provided is creditable based on how it was written and how there were no grammatical errors or "flashing bears".

After reading this website i now understand the rhetorical term context better. This website was very good because it have a definition of context. The website also gives examples of context in a rhetorical situation. I believe that this website is creditable because it is stated that it is from the University writing center. therefore i think that website is useful and creditable enough to use as a reference.

After reading this website i had a better understanding of the rhetorical term audience. The website was also a good resource because it gave examples of audience and other terms as well. The author of this website is named Dr. Lee Mc Gaan. Because Mr. Lee Mc Gaan is a doctor then he has to obtain a Phd. So therefore that is what i believe makes this website creditable.

After reding this power point and reveiwing the information provided. I found that it was easier to understand the rhetorical term "author". Althought the inforamtion did not have a certain author it was still help ful because it made all of the rhetorical terms basic and easy to understand. there fore i believe that this website is good and can provide good information.\ncreditable by:http://www.diigo.com/user/wesnells?domain=www.libarts.uco.edu

I used this URL for researching strategies