To ask about the field is really to ask how or what DH knows, and what it allows us to know. The answer, it turns out, is not much. Let’s begin with the tension between promise and product. Any neophyte to digital-humanities literature notices its extravagant rhetoric of exuberance. The field may be "transforming long-established disciplines like history or literary criticism," according to a Stanford Literary Lab email likely unread or disregarded by a majority in those disciplines. Laura Mandell, director of the Initiative for Digital Humanities, Media, and Culture at Texas A&M University, promises to break "the book format" without explaining why one might want to — even as books, against all predictions, doggedly persist, filling the airplane-hanger-sized warehouses of Amazon.com.
The future of VR - what's holding it back? | Digital Bodies - 0 views
Guest Post - Academics and Copyright Ownership: Ignorant, Confused or Misled? - The Sch... - 1 views
Tropy - Research Photo Management - 0 views
Daydream - 0 views
Critiquing the Critique of Digital Humanities - Text Patterns - The New Atlantis - 0 views
Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Student Retention - 1 views
« First
‹ Previous
181 - 200 of 394
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page