Skip to main content

Home/ beyondwebct/ Group items matching "Google" in title, tags, annotations or url

Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url

Sort By: Relevance | Date Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Barbara Lindsey

Wesley Fryer - Google Profile - 0 views

profiles.google.com/...about

fryer google profile finding filtering onlinefiltering

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 05 Apr 11 - No Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 05 Apr 11
     
    Example of a google profile
Barbara Lindsey

What we learned from 5 million books | Video on TED.com - 0 views

www.ted.com/...rned_from_5_million_books.html

digitalhumanities lcl TED Google ngram tedtalks

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 12 Apr 12 - No Cached
    • Barbara Lindsey
      Barbara Lindsey on 12 Apr 12
       
      From YouTube version of this talk: "[Google's digtized books] are very practical and extremely awesome." Erez Lieberman Aiden and Jean-Baptiste Michel from Harvard University use the 15 million books scanned and digitized by Google to show how a visual and quantitative analysis of text can provide insights about fields as diverse as lexicography, the evolution of grammar, collective memory, the adoption of technology, the pursuit of fame, censorship, and historical epidemiology.
  • ELA: There are more sobering notes among the n-grams. For instance, here's the trajectory of Marc Chagall, an artist born in 1887. And this looks like the normal trajectory of a famous person. He gets more and more and more famous, except if you look in German. If you look in German, you see something completely bizarre, something you pretty much never see, which is he becomes extremely famous and then all of a sudden plummets, going through a nadir between 1933 and 1945, before rebounding afterward. And of course, what we're seeing is the fact Marc Chagall was a Jewish artist in Nazi Germany. Now these signals are actually so strong that we don't need to know that someone was censored. We can actually figure it out using really basic signal processing. Here's a simple way to do it. Well, a reasonable expectation is that somebody's fame in a given period of time should be roughly the average of their fame before and their fame after. So that's sort of what we expect. And we compare that to the fame that we observe. And we just divide one by the other to produce something we call a suppression index. If the suppression index is very, very, very small, then you very well might be being suppressed. If it's very large, maybe you're benefiting from propaganda.
  • Now when Google digitizes a book, they put it into a really nice format. Now we've got the data, plus we have metadata. We have information about things like where was it published, who was the author, when was it published. And what we do is go through all of those records and exclude everything that's not the highest quality data. What we're left with is a collection of five million books, 500 billion words, a string of characters a thousand times longer than the human genome -- a text which, when written out, would stretch from here to the Moon and back 10 times over -- a veritable shard of our cultural genome.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • we're going to release statistics about the books. So take for instance "A gleam of happiness." It's four words; we call that a four-gram. We're going to tell you how many times a particular four-gram appeared in books in 1801, 1802, 1803, all the way up to 2008. That gives us a time series of how frequently this particular sentence was used over time. We do that for all the words and phrases that appear in those books, and that gives us a big table of two billion lines that tell us about the way culture has been changing.
  • You might also want to have a look at this particular n-gram, and that's to tell Nietzsche that God is not dead, although you might agree that he might need a better publicist.
  • JM: Now you can actually look at the distribution of suppression indexes over whole populations. So for instance, here -- this suppression index is for 5,000 people picked in English books where there's no known suppression -- it would be like this, basically tightly centered on one. What you expect is basically what you observe. This is distribution as seen in Germany -- very different, it's shifted to the left. People talked about it twice less as it should have been. But much more importantly, the distribution is much wider. There are many people who end up on the far left on this distribution who are talked about 10 times fewer than they should have been. But then also many people on the far right who seem to benefit from propaganda. This picture is the hallmark of censorship in the book record.
  • ELA: So culturomics is what we call this method. It's kind of like genomics. Except genomics is a lens on biology through the window of the sequence of bases in the human genome. Culturomics is similar. It's the application of massive-scale data collection analysis to the study of human culture. Here, instead of through the lens of a genome, through the lens of digitized pieces of the historical record. The great thing about culturomics is that everyone can do it. Why can everyone do it? Everyone can do it because three guys, Jon Orwant, Matt Gray and Will Brockman over at Google, saw the prototype of the Ngram Viewer, and they said, "This is so fun. We have to make this available for people." So in two weeks flat -- the two weeks before our paper came out -- they coded up a version of the Ngram Viewer for the general public. And so you too can type in any word or phrase that you're interested in and see its n-gram immediately -- also browse examples of all the various books in which your n-gram appears.
  • Barbara Lindsey on 12 Apr 12
     
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

Google Scholar Metrics for Publications - Google Scholar Blog - 0 views

googlescholar.blogspot.com/...-metrics-for-publications.html

google scholar publications metrics

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 01 Apr 12 - No Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 01 Apr 12
     
    fall 2012 syllabus
Barbara Lindsey

Free Technology for Teachers: Tripline - Create Travel Maps - 0 views

www.freetech4teachers.com/...ipline-create-travel-maps.html

map trip online travel free

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 08 Aug 10 - No Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 08 Aug 10
     
    Look at how this differs from Google Maps and Google Earth
Barbara Lindsey

Language Journeys: A Kid's Tour of Latin Music through Google Maps - 0 views

languagejourneys.blogspot.com/...atin-music-through-google.html

googlemaps videos music tour

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 14 Sep 10 - No Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 14 Sep 10
     
    Fantastic application of google maps for world languages.
Barbara Lindsey

Google Reader - !ECI831-Fall2010 - Student Blogs - 0 views

www.google.com/reader/bundle/user/16249773252705102935/bundle/!ECI831-Fall2010 - Student Blogs

googlereader couros students assessmentforlearning

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 04 Oct 10 - No Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 04 Oct 10
     
    Description: For-Credit Student Blogs of eci831 - Fall 2010 A bundle is a collection of blogs and websites hand-selected by your friend on a particular topic or interest. You can keep up to date with them all in one place by subscribing in Google Reader.
Barbara Lindsey

How to Use Google Documents: Video Series | eHow Videos - 0 views

www.ehow.com/_114_use-google-documents.html

googledocs howto videos

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 16 Oct 10 - Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 16 Oct 10
     
    This might be good for someone who needs step by step guidance in using the basic features of Google docs.
Barbara Lindsey

Web 2.0: What does it constitute? | 11 Feb 2008 | ComputerWeekly.com - 0 views

www.computerweekly.com/....0-what-does-it-constitute.htm

web2.0

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 11 Sep 08 - Cached
  • O'Reilly identified Google as "the standard bearer for Web 2.0", and pointed out the differences between it and predecessors such as Netscape, which tried to adapt for the web the business model established by Microsoft and other PC software suppliers.
  • Google "began its life as a native web application, never sold or packaged, but delivered as a service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly.
  • perpetual beta, as O'Reilly later dubbed it
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • Perhaps the most important breakthrough was Google's willingness to relinquish control of the user-end of the transaction, instead of trying to lock them in with proprietary technology and restrictive licensing
  • O'Reilly took a second Web 2.0 principle from Peer-to-Peer pioneer BitTorrent, which works by completely decentralising the delivery of files, with every client also functioning as a server. The more popular a file, is, the faster it can be served, since there are more users providing bandwidth and fragments of the file. Thus, "the service automatically gets better the more people use it".
  • Taking another model from open source, users are treated as "co-developers", actively encouraged to contribute, and monitored in real time to see what they are using, and how they are using it.
  • "Until Web 2.0 the learning curve to creating websites was quite high, complex, and a definite barrier to entry," says the third of our triumvirate of Tims, Tim Bray, director of Web Technologies at Sun Microsystems.
  • Web 2.0 takes some of its philosophical underpinning from James Surowiecki's book The Wisdom of Crowds, which asserts that the aggregated insights of large groups of diverse people can provide better answers and innovations than individual experts.
  • In practice, even fewer than 1% of people may be making a useful contribution - but these may be the most energetic and able members of a very large community. In 2006 1,000 people, just 0.003% of its users, contributed around two-thirds of Wikipedia's edits.
  • Ajax speeds up response times by enabling just part of a page to be updated, instead of downloading a whole new page. Nielsen's objections include that this breaks the "back" button - the ability to get back to where you've been, which Nielsen says is the second most used feature in Web navigation.
  • "Everybody who has a Web browser has got that platform," says Berners-Lee, in a podcast available on IBM's developerWorks site. "So the nice thing about it is when you do code up an Ajax implementation, other people can take it and play with it."
  • Web 2.0 is a step on the way to the Semantic Web, a long-standing W3C initiative to create a standards-based framework able to understand the links between data which is related in the real world, and follow that data wherever it resides, regardless of application and database boundaries.
  • The problem with Web 2.0, Pemberton says, is that it "partitions the web into a number of topical sub-webs, and locks you in, thereby reducing the value of the network as a whole."
  • How do you decide which social networking site to join? he asks. "Do you join several and repeat the work?" With the Semantic Web's Resource Description Framework (RDF), you won't need to sign up to separate networks, and can keep ownership of your data. "You could describe it as a CSS for meaning: it allows you to add a small layer of markup to your page that adds machine-readable semantics."
  • The problems with Web 2.0 lock-in which Pemberton describes, were illustrated when a prominent member of the active 1%, Robert Scoble, ran a routine called Plaxo to try to extract details of his 5,000 contacts from Facebook, in breach of the site's terms of use, and had his account disabled. Although he has apparently had his account reinstated, the furore has made the issue of Web 2.0 data ownership and portability fiercely topical.
  • when Google announced its OpenSocial set of APIs, which will enable developers to create portable applications and bridges between social networking websites, Facebook was not among those taking part. Four years after O'Reilly attempted to define Web 2.0, Google, it seems, remains the standard-bearer, while others are forgetting what it was supposed to be about.
Barbara Lindsey

Print: The Chronicle: 6/15/2007: The New Metrics of Scholarly Authority - 0 views

chronicle.com/...printable.cgi

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 23 Sep 07 - Cached
    • Barbara Lindsey
      Barbara Lindsey on 23 Sep 07
       
      Higher ed slow to respond.
  • Web 2.0 is all about responding to abundance, which is a shift of profound significance.
  • Chefs simply couldn't exist in a world of universal scarcity
  • ...33 more annotations...
  • a time when scholarship, and how we make it available, will be affected by information abundance just as powerfully as food preparation has been.
  • Scholarly communication before the Internet required the intermediation of publishers. The costliness of publishing became an invisible constraint that drove nearly all of our decisions. It became the scholar's job to be a selector and interpreter of difficult-to-find primary and secondary sources; it was the scholarly publisher's job to identify the best scholars with the best perspective and the best access to scarce resources.
    • Barbara Lindsey
      Barbara Lindsey on 23 Sep 07
       
      Comments?
  • Online scholarly publishing in Web 1.0 mimicked those fundamental conceptions. The presumption was that information scarcity still ruled. Most content was closed to nonsubscribers; exceedingly high subscription costs for specialty journals were retained; libraries continued to be the primary market; and the "authoritative" version was untouched by comments from the uninitiated. Authority was measured in the same way it was in the scarcity world of paper: by number of citations to or quotations from a book or article, the quality of journals in which an article was published, the institutional affiliation of the author, etc.
  • Google
  • Google
    • Barbara Lindsey
      Barbara Lindsey on 23 Sep 07
       
      Where critical analysis comes in
  • The challenge for all those sites pertains to abundance:
  • Such systems have not been framed to confer authority, but as they devise means to deal with predators, scum, and weirdos wanting to be a "friend," they are likely to expand into "trust," or "value," or "vouching for my friend" metrics — something close to authority — in the coming years.
  • ecently some more "authoritative" editors have been given authority to override whining ax grinders.
  • In many respects Boing Boing is an old-school edited resource. It doesn't incorporate feedback or comments, but rather is a publication constructed by five editor-writers
  • As the online environment matures, most social spaces in many disciplines will have their own "boingboings."
  • They differ from current models mostly by their feasible computability in a digital environment where all elements can be weighted and measured, and where digital interconnections provide computable context.
  • In the very near future, if we're talking about a universe of hundreds of billions of documents, there will routinely be thousands, if not tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands, of documents that are very similar to any new document published on the Web. If you are writing a scholarly article about the trope of smallpox in Shakespearean drama, how do you ensure you'll be read? By competing in computability. Encourage your friends and colleagues to link to your online document. Encourage online back-and-forth with interested readers. Encourage free access to much or all of your scholarly work. Record and digitally archive all your scholarly activities. Recognize others' works via links, quotes, and other online tips of the hat. Take advantage of institutional repositories, as well as open-access publishers. The list could go on.
  • the new authority metrics, instead of relying on scholarly publishers to establish the importance of material for them.
  • They need to play a role in deciding not just what material will be made available online, but also how the public will be allowed to interact with the material. That requires a whole new mind-set.
  • cholarly publishers
  • Many of the values of scholarship are not well served yet by the Web: contemplation, abstract synthesis, construction of argument.
  • Traditional models of authority will probably hold sway in the scholarly arena for 10 to 15 years, while we work out the ways in which scholarly engagement and significance can be measured in new kinds of participatory spaces.
  • if scholarly output is locked away behind fire walls, or on hard drives, or in print only, it risks becoming invisible to the automated Web crawlers, indexers, and authority-interpreters that are being developed. Scholarly invisibility is rarely the path to scholarly authority.
  • Web 1.0,
  • garbed new business and publishing models in 20th-century clothes.
  • fundamental presumption is one of endless information abundance.
  • Flickr, YouTube
  • micromarkets
  • multiple demographics
  • Abundance leads to immediate context and fact checking, which changes the "authority market" substantially. The ability to participate in most online experiencesvia comments, votes, or ratingsis now presumed, and when it's not available, it's missed.
  • Google interprets a link from Page A to Page B as a vote, by Page A, for Page B. But, Google looks at more than the sheer volume of votes, or links a page receives; for example, it also analyzes the page that casts the vote. Votes cast by pages that are themselves 'important' weigh more heavily and help to make other pages 'important,'"
  • It has its limits, but it also both confers and confirms authority because people tend to point to authoritative sources to bolster their own work.
  • That kind of democratization of authority is nearly unique to wikis that are group edited, since not observation, but active participation in improvement, is the authority metric.
  • user-generated authority, many of which are based on algorithmic analysis of participatory engagement. The emphasis in such models is often not on finding scarce value, but on weeding abundance
  • Authority 3.0 will probably include (the list is long, which itself is a sign of how sophisticated our new authority makers will have to be): Prestige of the publisher (if any). Prestige of peer prereviewers (if any). Prestige of commenters and other participants. Percentage of a document quoted in other documents. Raw links to the document. Valued links, in which the values of the linker and all his or her other links are also considered. Obvious attention: discussions in blogspace, comments in posts, reclarification, and continued discussion. Nature of the language in comments: positive, negative, interconnective, expanded, clarified, reinterpreted. Quality of the context: What else is on the site that holds the document, and what's its authority status? Percentage of phrases that are valued by a disciplinary community. Quality of author's institutional affiliation(s). Significance of author's other work. Amount of author's participation in other valued projects, as commenter, editor, etc. Reference network: the significance rating of all the texts the author has touched, viewed, read. Length of time a document has existed. Inclusion of a document in lists of "best of," in syllabi, indexes, and other human-selected distillations. Types of tags assigned to it, the terms used, the authority of the taggers, the authority of the tagging system.
  • Most technophile thinkers out there believe that Web 3.0 will be driven by artificial intelligences — automated computer-assisted systems that can make reasonable decisions on their own, to preselect, precluster, and prepare material based on established metrics, while also attending very closely to the user's individual actions, desires, and historic interests, and adapting to them.
  • Barbara Lindsey on 23 Sep 07
     
    When the system of scholarly communications was dependent on the physical movement of information goods, we did business in an era of information scarcity. As we become dependent on the digital movement of information goods, we find ourselves entering an era of information abundance. In the process, we are witnessing a radical shift in how we establish authority, significance, and even scholarly validity. That has major implications for, in particular, the humanities and social sciences.
Barbara Lindsey

Arounder: France: Paris: View Alexandre III bridge - 0 views

paris.arounder.com/...FR000009882.html

googlemaps maps actfl09 mafla09 paris tour 360

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 20 Jul 09 - Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 20 Jul 09
     
    Paris: View Alexandre III bridge"> Arounder: France: Paris: View Alexandre III bridge #aHeaderMin {border-bottom:1px solid #663399; color:#663399; background-color:#3c3c3c;} #aHeader {border-bottom:1px solid #663399;} #aHeader #aHeaderRight a:hover, #aHeader #aHeaderRight a:focus, #aHeader #aHeaderRight a:active, #aHeader #aHeaderRight a.selected {color:#fff; background-color:#663399;} #aHeader #acVariable li a {color:#fff; border-bottom:1px solid #fff; background:url(http://media.vrway.com/00/arounder/css/663399/tab_fullscreen_no_sel.gif) no-repeat;} #aHeader #acVariable li a:hover, #aHeader #acVariable li a:focus, #aHeader #acVariable li a:active, #aHeader #acVariable li a.selected {background:url(http://media.vrway.com/00/arounder/css/663399/tab_fullscreen.gif) no-repeat; border-bottom:1px solid #663399;} #aHeaderMin a {color:#663399;} #aHeaderMin a:hover, #aHeaderMin a:focus, #aHeaderMin a:active, #aHeaderMin a.selected {color:#fff; background-color:#663399;} #aHeader #cHelp a {border:1px solid #a3a3a3;} #aHeader #cHelp a:hover, #aHeader #cHelp a:focus, #aHeader #cHelp a:active {border:1px solid #663399;} #aText h2 {color:#663399;} #aDescription a:hover {color:#663399;} .sThumb { background: no-repeat center center; width: 100px; height: 80px; } #sSpacer1 { border-bottom:1px solid #fff; }
Barbara Lindsey

Dr. Wave Introduction - 0 views

wave.google.com/drwave.html

google wave video

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 16 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 16 Feb 10
     
    Dr. Wave explains what Google Wave is all about. Just a little over 2 minutes. You can explore more with the links on the left.
Barbara Lindsey

Overview (Powerful Ingredients for Blended Learning) - 0 views

wiki.powerfulingredients.com/...overview

privacy online rights educators fryer

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 28 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Before selecting, creating and using online accounts for this course, students are encouraged to consider the benefits of establishing and maintaining a professional digital footprint.
  • By using an alias or screename unrelated to their actual name, students can maintain public anonymity on the websites and in the web content created to fulfill course requirements.
  • Students are encouraged, but not required, to create a consistent, professional digital footprint through the completion of these course requirements. For more thoughts along these lines, see: Darren Kuropatwa's post, "Google Never Forgets"Jen Wagner's post, "If You Lead….Are You Ready For Them To Follow" Clarence Fisher's post, "Losing Your Footprint Sucks" Wesley Fryer's post, "Google Profiles, Online Reputation Management, and Digital Footprints" Notes from Robyn Treyvaud's presentation, "Our 21st Century Challenge: Developing Responsible, Ethical and Resilient Digital Citizens"Yahoo's Safety website: FAQs about your Digital Reputation The YouTube video, "Digital Footprints – Digital Dossier"
  • Barbara Lindsey on 28 Feb 10
     
    Wesley Fryer's course overview. Includes a terrific section on thoughts about student digital footprints, privacy and information disclosure.
Barbara Lindsey

Copying and pasting in Google Docs : Text editing - Google Docs Help - 0 views

docs.google.com/...answer.py

google docs copy paste server clipboard

shared by Barbara Lindsey on 18 Feb 10 - Cached
  • Barbara Lindsey on 18 Feb 10
     
    You can also copy and paste from one computer to another using the server clipboard menu.
Blanca Garcia Valenzuela

Free Technology for Teachers: Free 33 Page Guide - Google for Teachers - 0 views

www.freetech4teachers.com/...guide-google-for-teachers.html

GoogleDocs web2.0 GoogleApps

shared by Blanca Garcia Valenzuela on 31 Mar 10 - Cached
  • Blanca Garcia Valenzuela on 31 Mar 10
     
    "This guide avoids some of the obvious things, like using Google Docs for collaborative writing, and instead focuses on some of the lesser-used Google tools options"
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 401 Next › Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page