O'Reilly identified Google as "the standard bearer for Web 2.0", and pointed out the differences between it and predecessors such as Netscape, which tried to adapt for the web the business model established by Microsoft and other PC software suppliers.
Web 2.0: What does it constitute? | 11 Feb 2008 | ComputerWeekly.com - 0 views
-
-
Google "began its life as a native web application, never sold or packaged, but delivered as a service, with customers paying, directly or indirectly.
-
perpetual beta, as O'Reilly later dubbed it
- ...13 more annotations...
Some exciting news | Evri - Corporate - 0 views
e-Learning Acupuncture: Do you care about Web 3.0? - 0 views
Web 3.0 on Vimeo - 0 views
Planning for Neomillennial Learning Styles: Implications for Investments in Technology ... - 0 views
-
Research indicates that each of these media, when designed for education, fosters particular types of interactions that enable—and undercut—various learning styles.
-
Over the next decade, three complementary interfaces will shape how people learn
-
The familiar "world to the desktop." Provides access to distant experts and archives and enables collaborations, mentoring relationships, and virtual communities of practice. This interface is evolving through initiatives such as Internet2. "Alice in Wonderland" multiuser virtual environments (MUVEs). Participants' avatars (self-created digital characters) interact with computer-based agents and digital artifacts in virtual contexts. The initial stages of studies on shared virtual environments are characterized by advances in Internet games and work in virtual reality. Ubiquitous computing. Mobile wireless devices infuse virtual resources as we move through the real world. The early stages of "augmented reality" interfaces are characterized by research on the role of "smart objects" and "intelligent contexts" in learning and doing.
- ...48 more annotations...
Web 2.0 Storytelling: Emergence of a New Genre (EDUCAUSE Review) | EDUCAUSE - 2 views
-
A story is told by one person or by a creative team to an audience that is usually quiet, even receptive. Or at least that’s what a story used to be, and that’s how a story used to be told. Today, with digital networks and social media, this pattern is changing. Stories now are open-ended, branching, hyperlinked, cross-media, participatory, exploratory, and unpredictable. And they are told in new ways: Web 2.0 storytelling picks up these new types of stories and runs with them, accelerating the pace of creation and participation while revealing new directions for narratives to flow.
-
To further define the term, we should begin by explaining what we mean by its first part: Web 2.0. Tim O'Reilly coined Web 2.0 in 2004,1 but the label remains difficult to acceptably define. For our present discussion, we will identify two essential features that are useful in distinguishing Web 2.0 projects and platforms from the rest of the web: microcontent and social media.2
-
creating a website through Web 2.0 tools is a radically different matter compared with the days of HTML hand-coding and of moving files with FTP clients.
- ...44 more annotations...
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20▼ items per page