The killer feature to me is not the fun interactive ‘related terms’ web or the websites and images that pop up with each search. It’s the ‘Quizzes’ tool that gives you classroom-ready quiz questions on your search term. It’s downright amazing.
Quick Tip:You can use the little slider at the top of the search results screen to adjust how detailed your results are. You can go from the ABC chalkboard to the Einstein-y looking fella.
Without going into too much detail, instaGrok basically lets you punch in any search term (I'd recommend using a subject matter or item you're learning about) and get a neatly formatted and interactive experience as search results
And for my own account of the decision not to use term papers when I taught at Michigan State, you can check out a piece I published in Academe in Sept-Oct 2011. In some ways, it is more assertive on this issue than Richtel's piece, and is highly critical of the establishment English Department that too-often forgets its own importance as society’s “keeper” of two of the three R’s of traditional literacy, namely “reading” and “‘writing.’” I won’t rehearse my critique; here's the link: http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/pubsres/academe/2011/SO/Feat/davi.htm).
She is also working with composition teachers around the country who are documenting similar findings that, in fact, this generation comes in reading and writing more and better–and, yes, differently–than earlier ones, not worse. Lunsford uses the same metrics to assess these students as were used to evaluate past ones. Her website is: http://www.stanford.edu/~lunsfor1/
We have a Word Press class website. Students blog every week about the reading and project-based assignments they create. The two students charged with leading the class that week have to respond to every blog. The students respond to one another.
When I put their semester's work into a data hopper, even I was shocked to find out that they were averaging around 1000 words per week,
I argue that the open architecture of the Web is built on the principle of diversity and maximum participation--feedback and editing
Students learn to evaluate one another's thinking and challenge one another--and, far more important, they learn from one another and correct themselves. I cannot think of a better skill to take out into the world.
I respond more too. Like my students, I feel like I'm not spending as many hours reading and grading term papers, but, I know, from the end-of-term data crunching again, that, in fact, I have spent more time responding to their writing than I used to.
the tipping point in these classes is when someone the student doesn't know, an anonymous stranger, responds to their work. When it is substantive, the student is elated and surprised that their words were taken seriously. When it is rude or trollish, the student is offended. Both responses are good. The Internet needs more people committed to its improvement, to serious discourse.
As I often do with classes, I did a diagnostic, found that many of my students were woefully lacking in basic writing skills. I asked them what they most wanted from a writing class, and quickly transformed the class into a "writing as if your life depended upon it" workshop.
The "final" in the class was for each student--with lots of readings by me and the rest of the class--to apply for three or four summer jobs and internships. That year, every student landed a position.
More recently, I asked graduate students why they often left their term papers until the end and, with sadness, they confessed it was often because the whole exercise of writing a research paper is so debilitating and terrifying they often developed writer's block or writer's anxiety and needed the deadline to motivate them to write.