Skip to main content

Home/ BA (LCIM)/ Group items tagged records

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Joanne S

Guideline 15 - Developing and implementing a keyword thesaurus - State Records NSW - 0 views

  • Thesaurus: a controlled list of terms linked together by hierarchical, associative or equivalence relationships. (AS ISO 15489.2, 4.2.3.2).
  • Keyword thesaurus: a records management thesaurus based on functions and following the principles of keyword classification.
  • develop, implement, maintain and review a keyword thesaurus for use in records management.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • Keyword classification: involves grouping records into broad, functionally based areas represented by keywords. Records are further classified by the use of activity descriptors and optional subject descriptors.
  • Classification: systematic identification and arrangement of business activities and/or records into categories according to logically structured conventions, methods, and procedural rules represented in a classification system. (AS ISO 15489.1, 3.5).
  • A thesaurus is a tool that supports the classification and management of records, usually at the file level. It ensures that classification terms are used consistently throughout a recordkeeping system. It is a 'controlled language' tool.
  • A thesaurus may have: multiple entry points to guide users to preferred terms and correct titles cross-referencing scope notes and tips strict control of language, and alphabetical or hierarchical presentation.
  • Functional classification establishes and documents the relationships between records and the business activities they document which is essential in understanding records, and in particular understanding over time.
Joanne S

Recordkeeping Publications | SRO - 0 views

  •  
    General Disposal Authorities (GDAs) by SRO WA Familiarise yourself with the following 5 GDAs for State government agencies. Online MSWord versions are possible. 1. General Disposal Authority for Administrative Records (2003, amended 2006); 2. General Disposal Authority for Human Resource Management Records (revised 1999, amended 2001, 2006); 3. General Disposal Authority for Financial and Accounting Records (1996, revised 2006);  4. General Disposal Authority for Local Government Records (revised 2010); 5. General Disposal Authority for Source Records (2009). Note: That similar publications are available from the other SROs in Australia, please find your State's GDAs and review them.
Joanne S

State Records Act 2000 | SRO - 0 views

  •  
    Familiarise yourself with this legislation for your role as a Records Management professional. International students & students out of W.A., please look out for similar legislation. We will be covering this Act in detail in another Unit - Management of Records and Archives.
Joanne S

Information Management Associates - Home | Academic Records Management | University Rec... - 0 views

  •  
    Records Facts, Laws, Statistic, Wisdom An interesting site is that maintained by Information Management Associates, Inc.
Joanne S

Recordkeeping In Brief 47 - Introducing the Standard on the appraisal and disposal of S... - 0 views

  •  
    Recordkeeping In Brief 47 - Introducing the Standard on the appraisal and disposal of State records by NWS
Joanne S

State Records Act 2000 - 00-00-02 - 0 views

  •  
    Read the introduction to the State Records Act as background and summary to the Act itself. Also, read The Review of the implementation of the State Records Act 2000. 
Joanne S

The archives and records Australia google group - 0 views

  •  
    The archives and records Australia google group - http://groups.google.com/group/archives-and-records-australia . Often a slightly more academic discussion.
Joanne S

http://infopage.gem.wa.gov.au/docs/Buying_Guide_-_34504-and-123499.pdf - 0 views

  •  
    CUA - Storage, retrieval & destruction for paper & electronic records Common Use Agreement for outsourcing offsite storage, retrieval & destruction for paper & electronic records in W.A. [29 Mar 2005 to 28 Mar 2015]
Joanne S

EBSCOhost: Criteria for Evaluating RFID Solutions for Records and Information. - 0 views

  •  
    Joseph, M. (2007). Criteria for evaluating RFID solutions for records and information. Information Management Journal, Jan/Feb, 50-54.
Joanne S

CAARA - Council of Australasian Archives and Records Authorities - 0 views

  •  
    Activities (not for assessment) * What is distributed custody? A good place to start is with CAARA's (Council of Australasian Archives and Records Authorities) Policy Statement 15: Models for the distributed custody and management of government archival records. Adopted March 2006. http://www.caara.org.au/?s=Policy+Statement+15#principle15
Joanne S

Guideline 16 - Accountable outsourcing: Recordkeeping considerations of outsourcing NSW... - 0 views

  •  
    In light of the lecture on Accountability the following quote in the Guideline is important... "Public offices are accountable Outsourcing a business activity does not diminish a public office's responsibility to ensure that it is carried out properly and that all requirements for records are met".
Joanne S

Managing records : a handbook of principles and practice / Elizabeth Shepherd and Geoff... - 0 views

  •  
    Shepherd, E., & Yeo, G. (2003). Managing records: A handbook of principles and practice. London: Facet.
Joanne S

McInnes, S. (1998). Electronic records: The new archival frontier? Journal of the Socie... - 0 views

  •  
    McInnes, S. (1998). Electronic records: The new archival frontier? Journal of the Society of Archivists, 19(2): 211-220. Summarises how archival principles change in the electronic environment. This article is also relevant to the Appraisal section in Module 3.
Joanne S

Piggott, M. (1998). The history of Australian record-keeping: A framework for research. - 0 views

  •  
    Piggott, M. (1998). The history of Australian record-keeping: A framework for research. Australian Library Journal, 47(4): 343-354. Presents a case for more research into the history of archives in Australia.
  •  
    Piggott, M. (1998). The history of Australian record-keeping: A framework for research. Australian Library Journal, 47(4): 343-354. Presents a case for more research into the history of archives in Australia.
Joanne S

M. Piggott (2012) "Themes in Australian Recordkeeping, 1788 - 2010", Chapter 2, Archive... - 0 views

  •  
    M. Piggott (2012) "Themes in Australian Recordkeeping, 1788 - 2010", Chapter 2, Archives and societal provenance : Australian essays, Chandos Publishing. http://link.library.curtin.edu.au/p?pid=CUR_ALMA51110902610001951  Subjects: Archives -- Australia -- History ; Libraries and society -- Australia ; Archives -- Collection management -- Australia ; Archives -- Australia ; Libraries -- Australia ; Records -- Australia -- Management Description: "Records and archival arrangements in Australia are globally relevant because Australia's indigenous peoples represent the oldest living culture in the world, and because modern Australia is an ex-colonial society now heavily multicultural in outlook. Archives and societal provenance explores this distinctiveness using the theoretical concept of societal provenance as propounded by Canadian archival scholars led by Dr Tom Nesmith. The book's seventeen essays blend new writing and re-workings and combinations of earlier work and comprise the first text to present a societal provenance perspective to a national setting. The book is divided into four sections. The first part looks at the historical context of archives in Australia; the second part covers the institutions involved in the Australian archival story; the third part discusses the formation of archives; and the fourth part considers the debates surrounding archives in Australia. The book concludes with a consideration of the notion of an archival afterlife." --backcover. 
Joanne S

The Code4Lib Journal - How Hard Can It Be? : Developing in Open Source - 0 views

  • We experienced freedom to explore alternate avenues, to innovate, to take risks in ways that would have been difficult under the direct control of a district council.
  • patrons made it clear that while they appreciated that computers were a necessary part of a modern library, they did not consider them the most important part.
  • Our overall objective was to source a library system which: could be installed before Y2K complications immobilised us, was economical, in terms of both initial purchase and future license and maintenance support fees, ran effectively and fast by dial-up modem on an ordinary telephone line, used up-to-the minute technologies, looked good, and was easy for both staff and public to use, took advantage of new technology to permit members to access our catalogue and their own records from home, and let us link easily to other sources of information – other databases and the Internet. If we could achieve all of these objectives, we’d be well on the way to an excellent service.
  • ...14 more annotations...
  • "How hard can it be" Katipo staff wondered, "to write a library system that uses Internet technology?" Well, not very, as it turned out.
  • Koha would thus be available to anyone who wanted to try it and had the technical expertise to implement it.
  • ensure the software writers did not miss any key points in their fundamental understanding of the way libraries work.
  • fairly confident that we already had a high level of IT competence right through the staff, a high level of understanding of what our current system did and did not do.
  • The programming we commissioned cost us about 40% of the purchase price of an average turn-key solution.
  • no requirement to purchase a maintenance contract, and no annual licence fees.
  • An open source project is never finished.
  • Open source projects only survive if a community builds up around the product to ensure its continual improvement. Koha is stronger than ever now, supported by active developers (programmers) and users (librarians)
  • There are a range of support options available for Koha, both free and paid, and this has contributed to the overall strength of the Koha project.
  • Vendors like Anant, Biblibre, ByWater, Calyx, Catalyst, inLibro, IndServe, Katipo, KohaAloha, LibLime, LibSoul, NCHC, OSSLabs, PakLAG, PTFS, Sabinet, Strategic Data, Tamil and Turo Technology take the code and sell support around the product, develop add-ons and enhancements for their clients and then contribute these back to the project under the terms of the GPL license.
  • FRBR [5] arrangement, although of course it wasn’t called that 10 years ago, it was just a logical way for us to arrange the catalogue. A single bibliographic record essentially described the intellectual content, then a bunch of group records were attached, each one representing a specific imprint or publication.
  • The release of Koha 3.0 in late 2008 brought Koha completely into the web 2.0 age and all that entails. We are reconciled to taking a small step back for now, but the FRBR logic is around and RDA should see us back where want to be in a year or so – but with all the very exciting features and opportunities that Koha 3 has now.
  • In the early days, the Koha list appeared to have been dominated by programmers but I have noticed a lot more librarians participating now
  • "Adopt technology that keeps data open and free, abandon[ing] technology that does not." The time is right for OSS.
  •  
    For more information about Koha and how it was developed, see: Ransom, J., Cormack, C., & Blake, R. (2009). How Hard Can It Be? : Developing in Open Source. Code4Lib Journal, (7). Retrieved from http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/1638
1 - 20 of 69 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page