Sex offenders sue state after being denied leftovers from their Satanic feast - 17 views
-
Bryan Pregon on 08 Mar 21"They allege DHS officials are infringing on their religious freedom by refusing to let them keep the leftovers from their "Night of Transformation feast," and by blocking access to written materials dealing with blood rituals, spells, vampirism and nudity."
- ...9 more comments...
-
ataylor074 on 08 Mar 21I think this is wrong, I don't think they have a right to sue. They were told the rules before they had their little event, which I don't think they should have gotten in the first place. They just didn't like that the rules were enforced, and now they are mad. They shouldn't get the luxuries that we do because they are serving time for their crimes.
-
allisonwalker on 08 Mar 21I don't think they have the right to sue the state. first of all, they were well aware of the rules before this event took place. It's also a health and safety issue with food being taken back to the living quarters. They are just mad they can't enjoy more of the luxury food they were given. Even though they are paying for the choices they made. So, they shouldn't have the right to sue.
-
peytongrenoble on 08 Mar 21I think they can cry about it. They didn't deserve anything in the first place. :D
-
bklopp601 on 08 Mar 21I don't think they have the right to sue the state, I might have read this wrong but I didn't see anything about the state doing something that would offend them.
-
eballenger on 08 Mar 21I don't think they can win this because it's not infringing any rights.
-
tsilva588 on 08 Mar 21They shouldn't be able to sue the state because of Timer and Manner restrictions and they do put other people at some sort of state they shouldn't be. It's morally wrong and that can play a role in their case.
-
ericschmidtberge on 09 Mar 21Definitely an interesting headline. The claimants (being unjudgemental) feel that they had a religious act violated by the Government. It's a complicated manner because in a way the government did technically interfere with their religious freedoms because the Iowa Department of Human Services put the rule in place that inmates can´t take food into rooms for health reasons centrally not intending to block their freedom but instead concerned about safety and health. I think that even though in a way the claimants do have a point that their creepy and gross religious feast was blocked by the government I also think the rules that were put in place to protect everyone in the prison. Old food can cause sickness, rancid smells, and pests so it Could interfere with other inmates that had nothing to do with the group and therefore I think that the Iowa Department of Human Services is in the right and should win the case.
-
carsonschaa on 09 Mar 21They shouldn't be able to sue the state because of Timer and Manner restrictions and they do put other people at some sort of state, they shouldn't be able to do that!! It's morally wrong and that can play a role in their case.
-
zeaksorensen on 15 Mar 21i think if they got their way with this then it causes problems with other prisoners trying the same thing.
-
saraivargas on 15 Mar 21They aren't allowed to enact on their religion if it prohibits others from doing day to day tasks and also hurts/kills others
-
hannahliwai on 15 Mar 21i agree with sarai. i guess you can worship whomever or whatever you choose. Also, when you are feasting for a "ritual", aren't the foods only used at that time? i mean traditionally... i don't know.