Iowa Lawmaker Wants To Bring Back The Death Penalty - 1 views
-
joecarbis on 10 Dec 12I think life in prison would be worse than the death penalty to begin with
- ...33 more comments...
-
Natalie Wilson on 10 Dec 12I think the death penalty is pointless. In my opinion all it does is give horrible criminals an easy way out. If I did something horrible enough to get the death penalty, I'd rather die than serve life in prison.
-
caseyyard on 10 Dec 12Yup we are for sure with out a doubt falling back into a dark age.
-
garrett lee on 10 Dec 12i think we should have the death penalty
-
gharvey949 on 10 Dec 12Capital punishment is scarier than going to jail. I think crime rates would go down if this came back.
-
Ryan Loye on 10 Dec 12I think that the death penalty is wrong because they are trying to stop a murderer by murdering him themselves so really it's not much better then what the killer was doing himself.
-
Melissa Diaz-Aguilera on 10 Dec 12What would happen if the person was innocent after all?
-
Molly Wyant on 10 Dec 12Yea its pointless cuz then there not going sever there crime and its a easy way out
-
blakewilladsen on 10 Dec 12It will be interesting to hear Sorenson's argument as to why to changes things. Prisons are getting crowded but this is still Iowa. We still have a small population
-
jessicavaldez on 10 Dec 12I think the death penalty is not a bad idea nor I think it is a good idea. They will suffer in jail or suffer in hell. My opinion is put them in jail. If it is not their time to die yet then it is not. If they did something as bad as kill someone then they do deserve to go to jail and suffer for life.
-
Melissa Christensen on 10 Dec 12I would agree with harvey. The crime rates would go down and death penalties are effective in other regions.
-
aaron valdivia on 10 Dec 12Its not weather which one is worse, its that killing a person for killing another person is not only hypocritical but inhumane to today's society.
-
Jeremy Vogel on 11 Dec 12I disagree with bringing the death penalty back to Iowa. We've taken it away twice, once in 1872 and the second time in 1965, so I feel that shows that we, as a state, don't want it. Also the death penalty isn't really a deterrent for crime. There is a really interesting website that shows so facts about murder rates and comparing states that do and don't have the death penalty. They have a ton of information and I would recommend that you go through the site a little if you're interested in this topic. http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/murder-rates-nationally-and-state#MRord
-
joecarbis on 11 Dec 12I agree with Aaron, but i also think that justice should be served
-
Dylan Garner on 11 Dec 12Aaron giving someone the death penalty is acceptable. Having life in prison is worse anyway and it just puts more people in danger if that person is still alive.
-
bvasquez13 on 11 Dec 12better for the death penalty then life in prison.
-
gharvey949 on 11 Dec 12Maybe we need to start corporal punishment.
-
aaron valdivia on 11 Dec 12Mr. Garner, it would cost more money to give somebody the death penalty then to have them spend life in prison. We live in a different type of world then when people had there heads chopped off and dragons happened to be there to save "johns" life. To me that's not what God intended us to do with people that made a mistake and yes a big one but everybody has a reason to something or there could be something seriously wrong with there head to commit a murder but its not always there fault.
-
blakewilladsen on 11 Dec 12For 2011, the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.7, while the average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 3.1 For 2010, the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.6, while the average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 2.9 For 2009, the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 4.9, while the average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 2.8 For 2008, the average Murder Rate of Death Penalty States was 5.2, while the average Murder Rate of States without the Death Penalty was 3.3 http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/murder-rates-nationally-and-state#MRord
-
jacob whalen on 12 Dec 12It seems like if the act of violence is bad enough to get the death penalty most of the people kill themselves before the law can.
-
joecarbis on 13 Dec 12Would you rather spend the rest of your life in prison or be dead? Think about that!
-
Dylan Garner on 13 Dec 12Mr. Valdivia how would it cost more to give the death penalty then to keep them in prison for life? That's right, IT WOULDN'T. And I'm not saying give the death penalty for 1 murder. Based on depravity and body counts they should be sentenced to death.
-
dalton burk on 13 Dec 12unless you commited that bad of a crime i wouldn't worry about it coming back if your not gonna kill people
-
Jeremy Vogel on 13 Dec 12http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/documents/CostsRptFinal.pdf Dylan pages 20 and 21 of the PDF I linked above, explain why the death penalty costs more to administer than life in prison with out parole. More specifically on page 20 under the heading Time on Death Row it says, "In California, a legislative commission concluded that it costs the state an extra $90,000 for each death row inmate per year compared to the costs of the same inmate housed in general population. With over 670 inmates on death row, that amounts to an additional yearly cost of $60 million solely attributable to the death penalty."
-
joecarbis on 14 Dec 12Lets keep it simple say the death penalty would be cheaper than housing an inmate for life. Boom, Roasted.
-
Dylan Garner on 14 Dec 12Well then we can change the process to a quick and easy death without all that court BS. And plus I'm a prison warden so you guys both don't know what you are talking about. Aaron. And Jeremy.
-
joecarbis on 14 Dec 12FALSE. There is NO WAY you're a prison warden. The minimum age for a Warden is 21, plus you have to have lots of training. So someone of your prestige and experience, (not to mention your practically a 5 year old) would never be able to be a warden. Kthnxbye
-
Dylan Garner on 14 Dec 12I am prison
-
Jared Holcomb on 14 Dec 12Dylan and Joe, The reason that the death penalty is more expensive (and always will be) is the courts have to make sure that the criminal that is convicted is 100 percent guilty. There can't be any room for doubt. This means that the state has to supply better (More expensive) lawyers for the suspected party, and the trial has to be more in depth, therefor much longer. We can't make this time shorter than it is, because as a country, we are will do everything we can to keep an Innocent man from dying. And to just keep the perpetrators in jail is much cheaper, as there is already a well set system in place, and one more person will not increase the cost of that system to go up in large amounts as much as the singled out attention a person on death row will.
-
Payton Whiteaker on 14 Dec 12@ Dylan and Joe, if you both still think that the death penalty is cheaper, you are wrong, look at the 20th page Jeremy posted. @ Jared, ethically speaking, shouldn't any person who is accused of murder have an outrageously expensive lawyer anyways? If someone is going to be imprisoned for life, or going to be executed for a crime, should the one being executed receive a better lawyer?
-
Jared Holcomb on 14 Dec 12I think they should, but the person being put to jail for life has the chance to have new evidence pop up, and potentially let them eventually get out, they have the chance to get out on parole, they have the potential for choices. The man that is getting the death penalty have to be 100 percent sure. They don't have room to make mistakes. Ethically, I believe that people getting put away for life should have the same standards of 100 percent, but as I said, they have choices later on down the road. The dead don't.
-
Dylan Garner on 18 Dec 12@ Payton. It is cheaper. I know for a fact. I AM A PRISON WARDEN.
-
Emili Davis on 18 Dec 12I think one would suffer more life in prison rather than getting the death penalty.
-
joecarbis on 19 Dec 12@Peyton Are you trying to tell me its more expensive to keep someone alive in prison? this means that dude lives off our tax money. You will literally pay for his food, housing, and heck, that dude can even go lift for 3 hours a day and run his block! THink about that. State Champ.
-
Payton Whiteaker on 19 Dec 12@ Dylan, you are not a prison warden, keep the topics on this page relevant to the conversation, and have some potential form of evidence to back up what you say. @ Joe, it is much less expensive to keep someone alive then execute them. The death penalty is much more expensive than life without parole because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for capital cases. This process is needed in order to ensure that innocent men and woman are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and even with these protections the risk of executing an innocent person can not be completely eliminated. Example State: California How much they could save: With life in prison as the maximum punishment for 1st degree murder, they would save over 1 billion dollars a year. Money that could be saved per year for taxpayers: 90,000 dollars a year. Taxpayers save money if they do not use the death penalty. http://www.deathpenalty.org/article.php?id=42 Besides, many murder victims PREFER the idea of Life without Parole. If you do not believe this, check out this site made by the victims families: https://www.aclunc.org/docs/criminal_justice/death_penalty/Voices_from_California_Crime_Victims_for_Alternatives_to_the_Death_Penalty.pdf I have the feeling that nobody will even look at these links, but they are blunt evidence that it is cheaper, and makes more people happy, then when we use the death penalty. Oh.... By the way, 2nd degree murders (who cannot receive the death penalty) can do all that which you stated before Joe. Why should first degree murders be any different?
-
Molly Wyant on 19 Dec 12The death penalty is dumb you should just let that sever his/or hers time in prison.