Skip to main content

Home/ Ak Distance Ed/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Roxanne Mourant

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Roxanne Mourant

Roxanne Mourant

A Short History of MOOCs and Distance Learning - moocnewsandreviews.com - 0 views

  •  
    2008 - first MOOC launched from Canada
Roxanne Mourant

History of Distance Learning, Public Education in America - 0 views

  •  
    great overview
Roxanne Mourant

Online and Hybrid Course Enrollment and Performance in Washington State Community and T... - 0 views

  •  
    A study done on the success of online courses
Roxanne Mourant

Distance education - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  •  
    "taught a system of shorthand by mailing texts transcribed into shorthand on postcards and receiving transcriptions from his students in return for correction - the element of student feedback was a crucial innovation of Pitman's system.[5] This scheme was made possible by the introduction of uniform postage rates across England from 1840.[6] "
Roxanne Mourant

Presentation - 1 views

started by Roxanne Mourant on 20 Jan 14 no follow-up yet
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    History of Alaska's Distance Education

    Come see where we have been and why as we surge towards the future of distance education in Alaska. This multi-media presentation will include interviews from many experts in the field including past and present Commissioners of Education, the University of Alaska, superintendents, teachers and many other Alaskans. Find out the pedagogy behind what has been done in order to think about success for our future.

    10 min Leadership Presentation OUTLINE:
    Hook: ACSA Report - all districts using DE
    Main: History timelines with anecdotal stories
    Wrap-up: White Paper - Google Doc for input

    1.75 min ASTE Presentation OUTLINE:
    Hook: 2Revolution video
    Intro: Setting the stage (who is in the room)
    Parking Lot (for comments, suggestions, questions)
    Outline goal for presentation
    Pre-Assmt: Think/Pair/Share - Why are you here, what do you hope to walk away with.
    Agenda
    Meat: What's been done and why. (Prezi from Leadership Summit)
    Strategies: Think/Pair/Share - What works for you and why OR what would you like to try and why.
    Final: Sharing of Strategies
Roxanne Mourant

(1) Roxy Mourant - 0 views

  •  
    video of education gone array Trinikid is an internationally acclaimed blogger from Trinidad and Tobago: http://www.trinikid.com/
Roxanne Mourant

Quotes - 2 views

Commissioner Mike Hanley Quote
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    Mike Hanley, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Education & Early Development
    I believe that the biggest stride that we have taken is not around pedagogical strategies but rather around a recognition that we can and should be offering our students so much more. As we cling to traditional techniques, our students leave us with gaps in learning strategies and knowledge that was easily accessible. I believe that a growing dissatisfaction with what our students are getting-especially in small schools, is the driver of change around distance delivery.
    Interestingly, various pedagogies have gained pockets of support and have erroneously driven the efforts of individuals with good intentions around the state. I say "erroneously" because when the tool becomes the driver, we cling to that tool even though the ultimate goal is greater access and greater opportunity for kids. The right tool has to be chosen for the right situation and the right student. Curriculum companies can become those drivers.
  • ...3 more comments...
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    Dan Walker, Assistant Superintendent, Lower Kuskokwim School District
    The major strides we have made over the past 20 years are multi-fold. LKSD started out using the TV studios at KYUK to broadcast inservice trainings out to our sites. This was one way and not very interactive. If you fast forward to today we have a robust two way interactive video conferencing set-up with 3 full time studios. These are used to deliver a variety of VTC classes to students and PD to staff. One of the biggest strides we have made is the ability to make VTC as interactive as possible. Our teachers and PD staff are using delivery techniques that keep students and staff engaged in learning. Without this interactivity the material tends to be dry and boring. Because we are at a distance, our teachers must find ways to go beyond stand and deliver and find avenues and uses of technology that keep kids excited about learning. Who would have thought just a few short years ago that we could teach an advanced, hand-on, Robotics and Engineering class over the VTC, or that we would be blending different modalities of learning and combining course content into a variety of face-to-face, online synchronous and asynchronous experiences.

    There are also constant challenges in keeping a distance learning network going. You have to up time approaching 100% or you lose opportunities to teach and it is hard enough to find enough time as it is. If you then have large amounts of down time due to technological glitches people will lose interest. This is only accomplished by having reliable networks and enough bandwidth to make it work. It is very challenging and expensive.
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    Ryan Stanley, Director of Tech Ops, SouthEast Regional Resource Center
    The accessibility of synchronous tools like videoconferencing, especially within districts that have good enough bandwidth, is probably the most notable stride over the years. A lot of money has been invested in and spent ongoing on maintaining synchronous VTC bandwidth and equipment.

    The second most notable stride would be the evolution of correspondence school into web-based asynchronous or blended courses like those from VHS and AKLN. These are coming along and quite effective for individual, self-driven students when proficient/engaging online teacher/materials are involved.

    The pedagogy behind synchronous VTC is pretty much the same as the pre-existing sage-on-the-stage, stand-and-deliver pedagogy. It allows teachers to continue delivering the way they've always delivered (mostly). Students on the recipient end, tho, are just as likely (if not more so) to space off when looking at a talking head on a TV.

    The pedagogy for many online courses is similar to that of correspondence school - which doesn't always take advantage of the myriad of opportunities for online interaction but are instead focused more on delivering materials to the student. It's easy to confuse animation with interactivity. More and more courses are making use of online discussions, but folks are only beginning to understand how to get students working on projects together, asynchronously, over distance.

    Synchronous VTC in many cases is quite expensive to maintain. One lesson to be learned from this is that often a simple telephone speakerphone would do the same job for a fraction of the cost. The video doesn't allow a teacher to *really* see what is going on in that remote classsroom. Instead, a simple telephone with great speakerphone would suffice, especially if a proctor is present in the remote classroom. Additionally an inexpensive webcam and computer/projector in the remote classroom can provide less expensive options to let the teacher "see" the students.

    The other huge lesson to be learned is to put infrastructure first. I've seen so many schools that make the easy technology purchase, whether from a vendro-written RUS grant with top-of-the-line VTC gear, or iPads, or Smartboards, or computers, but they lack the network, wireless, bandwidth, and organizational infrastructure to meaningfully integrate the tools.
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    Spike Jorgensen, Former Superintendent, Alaska Gateway School District
    Education has to be based on the needs of the students statewide in a comprehensive curriculum.

    Technology allows for adaptations of the curriculum to include culture and language. The power of the computer to build that structure and then deliver it is available to you and distance delivery understands that better than anyone else.

    Distance delivery is limiting in allowing the teacher to get close to the student to assess what they really need.

    Alaska Gateway SD has gone from getting the highest per-pupil reimbursement was the highest cost in our district. We have gone from that to ¼ of the base-student allocation for distance education, through a series of funding changes. The transition began with correspondence schools, including Alyeska, to local correspondence that does not require attendance. Now there are approximately 200 students who do not have regular attendance. I believe there are about 5,000-10,000 Alaska students who are not being educated. Parents do not declare they are homeschooling their children.

    To do a proper job of distance delivery in Alaska to include EED and UofA as well as K-12, it would be in the $billions. It can be done - to address all the comprehensive standards that need to be taught, the assessments, the teaching strategies and then options for various types of learning and instruction.

    Mt. Edgecumbe = moves the kids to the education. Parents and state do not like this.
    Shift from education to economic motivation. It moves kids out of the home school into a regional boarding school.
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    Larry LeDoux, Former Alaska Commissioner of Education
    My thoughts on digital learning began with the TRS-80 I brought into my classroom in the Fall of 1978 and have become increasingly cluttered (albeit more passionate) over the years. I have been working with technology as a tool to help enhance student learning ever since. My brain is full of great memories, some disappointments and lots and lots of students and teachers transformed by the power of digitally assisted/enhanced learning. So much has been done and so much to do!
    What do you believe are the major strides that have been made in the history of distance education in Alaska?
    1. New learning options for students.
    2. Professional support for isolated rural teachers.
    3. Professional Development
    4. Access to learning resources
    5. Isolation Resolution
    6. Student access to content specialists.
    Alaska Native Teachers and Learners
    A. Increased access to language and culture bearers.
    B. Increased access to age and interest peers.
    C. Anonymous sharing of thoughts, concerns and ideas by students and teachers.
    D. Preservation of culture projects. (i.e., Old Minto)
    E. Cultural simulations
    F. Increased access to professional role models, information, post-secondary opportunities.
    G. Increased access to content expertise
    3. Dissolution of Statewide correspondence Program (Alyeska). The bureaucracy had become moribund and driven by the momentum of past practice. While a step forward relevant to the possibility of increased innovation, the exit of DEED from direct interest, beyond the enforcement of regulations, left innovation of e-learning in the hands of a number of districts, for-profit correspondence companies and educational entrepreneurs. ALVN was designed to fill this leadership vacuum.

    Rx2) What do you believe is the pedagogy behind them?

    Well, the pedagogy was more of the same initially. In a way, correspondence programs, pre and post the emerging internet-based communication modalities, reflected the teacher-led, knowledge-based instruction predominant in the majority of American classrooms. The synchronous classroom teacher was merely replaced by a book.

    Just as in regular classrooms, students with strong parent-support foundations were successful while students with risk factors slipped out of the system.

    However, distance instruction that combines/blends opportunity for peer social interaction, synchronous and asynchronous instruction and constructivist teaching practices that allow students to learn naturally. is beginning to emerge. Commentary: While this is theoretically true, the recent national emphasis on certain strategies/assessments that deemphasize student creativity, innovation and problem-solving are at odds with the skills and attitudes necessary for students to achieve 21st century application focused standards. We take one step forward and then shoot ourselves in the other foot.

    Rx3) What lessons were / could be learned?

    In a nutshell, "Doing more of what doesn't work using digital learning tools will not work"

    As classroom instruction becomes more student/knowledge-centric and students are granted the freedom to communicate, collaborate, problem-solve, innovate ..... digital learning assets will find a natural place in both instruction and learning.

    In the late '80's I became responsible (among many other duties) for Kodiak's correspondence program. Because I had some "hippie" teachers, who were almost universally looked down upon by classroom teachers for their constructivist tendencies and emphasis on relationship-based instruction, the program was very effective. However, budget cuts were used as a reason to reduce staff to a point where they shifted papers. The program was no longer a place for traditional and non-traditions students to find success and freedom.

    Later, I used correspondence as effective credit recovery option in the grant-funded alternative program I supervised. My staff and I worked to heal their mind, attitude and learning self-esteem while the courses served to earn lost credit. I always felt a bit guilty about breaking lots of rules in those days but the legacy of student success by my graduates has assuaged my conscience and validated my continued state of instructional rebellion.
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    John Monahan, Director, Alaska Distance Education Consortium (AkDEC)
    My experience working with rural communities is that lack of bandwidth speed limits the possibilities of distance education. It used to be that we were the leaders in distance education by virtue of correspondence - cutting edge correspondence distance education was consider mailing out packages of books and materials, but really wasn't that exciting or motivating for the traditional student.
    What has really recently significantly changed in Alaska, is increased bandwidth speed and the opportunities that it provides. Being able to do video conferencing, for example, using CILC (Center for Interactive Learning and Collaboration) for taking virtual field trips, and accessing other institutions resources to broaden community access. . BTOP (Broadband Technology Opportunities Program), Alaska Department of Education's Ed Tech, and the things the Alaska TelCo's are doing to increase speed and capacity within the system are what have recently been instrumental in making distance education work in Alaska.

    2:20 I think pedagogy changes depending on the resources available. What I can do via a fax machine is very different than what I can do via a major bandwidth with video conferencing. The pedagogy has to change with the resources and the access that you have. Even given good resources, the 'sage on the stage' has a part in good instruction. It has to be balanced with interactive and group learning. We send teachers to school to get educated and learned on their expertise not so they don't say anything, I think some of the techniques out there recently enhance the sage on the stage. For example: a flipped classroom; let a teacher do a presentation or have a guest speaker and let the student and teacher and parent observe that and then the teacher can guide the learning that follows that conversation. Things like that are changing how learning looks; not necessarily how the classroom looks; but how learning is taking place.
    4:50 We have an agreement with CILC that allows for schools and classrooms to access other collaborative sites. There are currently over 300 institutions globally in the CILC consortium that allow for student to interact with each other. This is a good example of what could blossom on the Net.
    6:15 One of the things that I think that we've learned in Alaska is that we have to keep the equipment as least complex as possible because we don't have the infrastructure needed for some of the equipment attempted previously. I looked at "Big Sky", "Star Schools" and lived through "RATNET." Whenever the dish got out of wack, you had to wait for someone to come out there and fix it. That could bring a site down for a long time. As I think about what keeps a program operational, it's the ability to not get bogged down with the technology and the things that could prevent it from happening.
    There are also the standard actions we all know. You have to put time into training and bringing everyone together to build relationships. It takes the blended learning of face-to-face and then support via distance to build a network.
Roxanne Mourant

DE in Alaska - Timeline (DRAFT 1/6/14) - 6 views

timeline
started by Roxanne Mourant on 07 Jan 14 no follow-up yet
  • Roxanne Mourant
     
    ASTE Description:
    History of Alaska's Distance Education

    Come see where we have been and why as we surge towards the future of distance education in Alaska. This multi-media presentation will include interviews from many experts in the field including past and present Commissioners of Education, the University of Alaska, superintendents, teachers and many other Alaskans. Find out the pedagogy behind what has been done in order to think about success for our future.


    DE in Alaska - Timeline (DRAFT 1/30/14)

    1840 - First distance ed course offered. Sir Isaac Pitman - shorthand by mail.
    1862 - Morrill Land Grant Act - gives states and territories land for the purpose of supporting post-secondary institutions. (1922 Ak Agricultural School and School of Mines opened six miles NW of Fairbanks with 13 students.)

    1867 - Alaska was purchased from Russia

    1870 - Sitka opened non-native private schools
    1878 - Wrangell opened a girls' home and school (until 1889).
    1878 - Presbyterian mission school opened and became the Sitka Industrial Training School around 1884.
    1880 - Sitka had 2 public schools: 1 for natives and 1 for non-natives
    1884 - Organic Act requires all children to receive education
    1884 - 1908 - Sheldon Jackson (Presbyterian Minister) was appointed as head of Alaska's education system.
    1890 - As promised a public school was opened in the Pribilof Island (in an 1870, 20-year lease to
    1892 - 17 government-supported schools operated. Non-native schools were at Sitka, Juneau and Douglas. Churches operated the other 14.
    1900 - Organic Act of 1884 was revised to give local control of school finance and operations
    1905 - Nelson Act provided for education outside of incorporated towns for whites and white-blood mix who were 'civilized' (run by the Federal Bureau of Education) 1906 - Sitka vocational school was now opened to Natives.
    1906 - Orah Dee Clark began a 50-year teaching career at Kodiak, and later organized the first school in Anchorage in 1915
    1913 - Alaska legislature passed a law requiring all children to attend school 1915 - Territorial Board of Education was established (composed of the governor and four senators - 1 from each judicial division) and oversaw education of non- Natives
    1917 - First Territorial Commissioner of Education, Lester D. Henderson, was appointed by the Board of Education
    1917-1925 - Henderson organized a 2-wk annual teachers institute (1918 they formed the Alaska Education Association)
    1926 - White Mountain Vocational Boarding School opened for Natives, ages 14-21.
    1930 - Ak Ed Asoc is affiliated with NEA
    1931 - 1984 - Bureau of Indian Affairs took over operation of rural Alaska schools from the Bureau of Education
    1933 - Board of Ed was reorganized to include 5 members (judicial divisions and one at-large) for 6-year terms appointed by the governor, with consent of the legislature exclusive hunting rights for fur seals on the Pribilof Islands included the provision that the company maintain schools on St. Paul and St. George islands for at least eight months of the year.)
    1906 when instruction in the English language, writing, and mathematics was offered at the industrial school at Sitka.
    1935 - Univ. of Ak was formed from the previous Ak Ag College & School of mines. Residents were not charged and non-residents paid $20 per semester.
    1939 - EED opens Alyeska Centralized Correspondence School
    1947 - Mt. Edgecumbe Boarding School opens with nearly 500 students.
    1953 - Ak Territorial Legislature created a community college system. Uof A added campuses at Anchorage and Juneau.
    1960 - APU opened in Anchorage
    1969 - Comsat provided first live broadcast: Neil Armstrong's walk on the moon
    1969 - Open University initiative started in the UK
    1972-1976 - Molly Hootch case finally settles and the State of Alaska begins a $143 million program to comply
    1974 - 1975 - NASAs ATS-6 satellite was used to transmit education and health programs to more than 20 rural villages in Alaska.
    1975 - Alaska Native Magazine (NW Regional Lab's 1-year programs relevant to Alaskan villages)
    1975 - KYUK-TV and Kuskokwim Community College broadcast some regional programs
    1975 - KAKM-TV and Anchorage School District received 2 hours a day of instructional TV
    1975 - RATNET began (The Rural Alaska Television Network advisory group (RATNET)
    1977 - ETA began (4-yr funded "Educational Telecommunications for Alaska")
    1977 - DOE established an Office of Technology and Telecommunications for "TV for Learning"
    1977 - UACN internet statewide system established through UofA with cable connections between Fairbanks, Juneau and Anchorage and dial-up elsewhere
    1980 - Learn/Alaska began daily broadcasts, with collaboration of agencies.
    1990 -Star School Program: ESD 101 of Spokane, Wa awarded $9.8 million that included Alaska.
    1996 - First accredited online university: Jones International University (based out of Colorado) was launched by Glenn Jones, CEO and Bernard Luskin, Chancellor
    1999 - ARCS (Alaska Rural Communications Service) Feb 8, 1999 - Alascom with an appropriation made by the Alaska Legislature. RATNET dissolved in 1995 and ARCS took its place.
    2004 - Alyeska Centralized Correspondence School is transferred to Yukon-Koyukuk SD (July 1)
    2008 - MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) started (Connectivism and Connective Knowledge) from Canada - CCK08
    2010 - EED begins statewide forums for hearing concerns and needs for K-12 distance education collaborative effort
    2011 - Alaska's Learning Network begins statewide through a grant to K-12 school districts
jason ohler

Players - 3 views

started by jason ohler on 19 Dec 13 no follow-up yet
Roxanne Mourant

http://www.iser.uaa.alaska.edu/Projects/akbroadbandproj/telecomsymposium/WilkeLearnAlas... - 1 views

  •  
    Jennifer Wilke, former DOE manager for Learn/Alaska
Roxanne Mourant

Interior Distance Education of Alaska - 2 views

shared by Roxanne Mourant on 19 Dec 13 - No Cached
  •  
    Galena City School District goes statewide offering distance education to all K-12, starting in 1997
Roxanne Mourant

Distance Education, Online Courses, Professional Development - Alaska's Learning Networ... - 0 views

shared by Roxanne Mourant on 18 Dec 13 - No Cached
  •  
    AKLN Web site
Roxanne Mourant

AKDEC : About - 0 views

  •  
    AK Distance Ed Consortium - John Monahan's group that never really got started
Roxanne Mourant

Archived: 1990 Cycle 2 Abstracts -- Star Schools Program - 1 views

  • Educational Service District 101 in Spokane, Washington, received a total of $9.8 million during FY 1990-91 to provide quality educational programs for students and contemporary inservice workshops for teachers in rural and remote school districts in Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon and Washington. Approximately 3,000 students enrolled in courses such as science and technology, contemporary applied math, Russian, Japanese, and Spanish. Adult telecasts offered through the Star Schools grant included teacher inservice workshops and programs that engaged parents in building the self-esteem of their children.
Roxanne Mourant

Alaska History and Cultural Studies - Alaska's Heritage - CHAPTER 4-20: EDUCATION - 1 views

  • Russians closed the schools they had operated in Alaska when they left in 1867
  • When the residents of Sitka formed a civil government in 1868, they purchased a building for a school and hired a teacher.
  • A few private schools for non-Native children operated for brief periods at Sitka during the 1870s. In 1880, Sitka had two public schools, one for Natives and one for non-Natives.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • In 1870, the U.S. government's 20-year lease to exclusive hunting rights for fur seals on the Pribilof Islands included the provision that the company maintain schools on St. Paul and St. George islands for at least eight months of the year.
  • In August 1877, Amanda McFarland, a Presbyterian missionary, arrived at Wrangell to open a mission and school. In 1878, it became a girls' school and home that operated at least until 1889.
  • The Organic Act, passed by Congress in 1884, directed the Secretary of the Interior to provide education for children in Alaska without regard to race. The provision was unusual for the time. Additionally, Congress authorized $25,000 for education in Alaska. The secretary chose to appoint a general agent to oversee the opening and operation of schools around the district. Sheldon Jackson, a Presbyterian leader who was interested in Alaska, was appointed to the position and served until 1908.
  • At Sitka, a Presbyterian mission school opened by John G. Brady in 1878 in an old army barracks became the Sitka Industrial Training School around 1884. It offered training in carpentry, machine work, and carving. The boys also were assigned chores around the school. Later, the school offered a program for girls. Their courses included sewing, mending, cooking, washing and ironing, and cleaning. As late as 1905, the Sitka school, the Roman Catholic mission school at Holy Cross, and a school at the Tsimshian reserve at Metlakatla, were the only vocational training schools available to Alaska Natives.
  • Funding for Alaska's education system involved federal, territorial, and local governments. The federal government contributed 25 per cent of the license fees that were paid into the Alaska Fund. Revenue from the sale of timber from Alaska's national forests was for education and roads. The territory contributed a portion of the funds it collected from fisheries, cold storage plants, and license fees. Additionally, every male resident between the ages of 21 and 40 was assessed five dollars annually for school support. Local governments contributed funds they collected from license fees and real and personal property taxes.
  • By 1912, incorporated towns supported schools for non-Natives, the Bureau of Education operated schools for non-Natives who lived outside of incorporated towns and for Natives, and a number of missionary groups continued to operate boarding and day schools for Natives.
  • In 1972, Alaska Legal Services sued the State of Alaska on behalf of Molly Hootch. Molly, a high school student from the Western Alaska village of Emmonak, attended school in Anchorage. The suit charged that boarding schools and correspondence courses did not provide the same educational opportunities as attending high school in the student's hole community. In 1976, the State of Alaska agreed with Alaska Legal Services that villages that had an elementary school should have high schools. The State of Alaska immediately began a $143 million program to construct schools in compliance with the consent decree.
  • In 1935, the institution became the University of Alaska. Residents were not charged tuition and non-residents paid $20 per semester.
  •  
    Alaska Humanities Forum
‹ Previous 21 - 40 of 42 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page