Skip to main content

Home/ Artificial Intelligence Research/ Group items tagged maps

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Matvey Ezhov

Mapping the brain - MIT news - 2 views

  • To find connectomes, researchers will need to employ vast computing power to process images of the brain. But first, they need to teach the computers what to look for.
  • to manually trace connections between neurons
  • want to speed up the process dramatically by enlisting the help of high-powered computers.
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • To do that, they are teaching the computers to analyze the brain slices, using a common computer science technique called automated machine learning, which allows computers to change their behavior in response to new data.
  • With machine learning, the researchers teach computers to learn by example. They feed their computer electron micrographs as well as human tracings of these images. The computer then searches for an algorithm that allows it to imitate human performance.
  • Their eventual goal is to use computers to process the bulk of the images needed to create connectomes, but they expect that humans will still need to proofread the computers’ work.
  • Last year, the National Institutes of Health announced a five-year, $30 million Human Connectome Project to develop new techniques to figure out the connectivity of the human brain. That project is focused mainly on higher level, region-to-region connections. Sporns says he believes that a good draft of higher-level connections could be achieved within the five-year timeline of the NIH project, and that significant progress will also be made toward a neuron-to-neuron map.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      draft of human connectome within five years
  • Though only a handful of labs around the world are working on the connectome right now, Jain and Turaga expect that to change as tools for diagramming the brain improve. “It’s a common pattern in neuroscience: A few people will come up with new technology and pioneer some applications, and then everybody else will start to adopt it,” says Jain.
Volucer Volucer

XMind - Social Brainstorming and Mind Mapping - 4 views

  •  
    XMind, combined with online sharing service, provides a revolutionary way to enable both team brainstorming and personal mind mapping.
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    а не заюзать ли?
  •  
    ок, давай посмотрим
  •  
    Ну, вы посмотрите, оцените, а уж если вам понравится, тогда я поставлю.
mikhail-miguel

Whimsical Artificial Intelligence - Whimsical offers tools like mind maps, wireframes, ... - 0 views

  •  
    Whimsical Artificial Intelligence: Whimsical offers tools like mind maps, wireframes, flowcharts, projects, documentation, templates, embed kit, etc (whimsical.com).
mikhail-miguel

Litmaps - Maps of connected papers based on their citations (litmaps.com). - 0 views

  •  
    Litmaps: Maps of connected papers based on their citations (litmaps.com).
mikhail-miguel

Textomap - Generate interactive maps from text in seconds (textomap.com). - 0 views

  •  
    Textomap: Generate interactive maps from text in seconds (textomap.com).
mikhail-miguel

Miro Artificial Intelligence - Online whiteboard tool. Sticky notes, images, cards, cod... - 0 views

  •  
    Miro Artificial Intelligence: Online whiteboard tool. Sticky notes, images, cards, code blocks, sequence diagrams, and mind maps (miro.com).
mikhail-miguel

ChatMind - Generate and edit mind maps in conversation with Artificial Intelligence (ch... - 0 views

  •  
    ChatMind: Generate and edit mind maps in conversation with Artificial Intelligence (chatmind.tech).
mikhail-miguel

Maps GPT - Quickly find and explore interesting places near them (mapsgpt.com). - 0 views

  •  
    Maps GPT: Quickly find and explore interesting places near them (mapsgpt.com).
mikhail-miguel

Maps GPT - Quickly find and explore interesting places near them (mapsgpt.com). - 0 views

  •  
    Maps GPT: Quickly find and explore interesting places near them (mapsgpt.com).
mikhail-miguel

Litmaps - Maps of connected papers based on their citations (litmaps.com). - 0 views

  •  
    Litmaps: Maps of connected papers based on their citations (litmaps.com).
mikhail-miguel

CoolMindMaps - Mind map creation and search (coolmindmaps.com). - 0 views

  •  
    CoolMindMaps: Mind map creation and search (coolmindmaps.com).
mikhail-miguel

ChatMind - Generate and edit mind maps in conversation with Artificial Intelligence (ch... - 0 views

  •  
    ChatMind: Generate and edit mind maps in conversation with Artificial Intelligence (chatmind.tech).
Matvey Ezhov

On Biological and Digital Intelligence - 0 views

  • In essence, Hawkins argues that, to whatever extent the concept of “consciousness” can’t be boiled down to brain theory, it’s simply a bunch of hooey.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      Not true!
  • in which conscious experience is more foundational than physical systems or linguistic communications
  • Conscious experiences are associated with patterns, and patterns are associated with physical systems, but none of these is fully reducible to the other. 
  • ...22 more annotations...
  • He makes the correct point that roughly-human-level AI’s will have dramatically different strengths and weaknesses from human being, due to different sensors and actuators and different physical infrastructures for their cognitive dynamics.  But he doesn’t even touch the notion of self-modifying AI – the concept that once an AI gets smart enough to modify its own code, it’s likely to get exponentially smarter and smarter until it’s left us humans in the dust.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      Совершенно не имеет отношения к теме, подход Хокинса легко масштабируется до сверх- и сверх-сверх-сверхчеловеческого интеллекта.
  • therefore if AI closely enough emulates the human brain it won’t radically self-modify either
  • Rather, I think the problem is that the field of AI has come to focus on “narrow AI” – programs that solve particularly, narrowly-defined problems – rather than “artificial general intelligence” (AGI). 
  • cognitive science, artificial general intelligence, philosophy of mind and abstract mathematics
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      т.о. Гортзел признается, что вообще принимает и не считает нужным принимать нейронауку в расчет, т.е. опирается только на эмпирические представления о том, как работает сознание.
  • So what we’re doing is creating commercial narrow AI programs, using the software framework that we’re building out with our AGI design in mind.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      и в этом его большое отличие от платформы Хокинса, которая имеет одинаковую структуру для всех ее применений
  • I tend to largely agree with his take on the brain
  • I think he oversimplifies some things fairly seriously – giving them very brief mention when they’re actually quite long and complicated stories.  And some of these omissions, in my view, are not mere “biological details” but are rather points of serious importance for his program of abstracting principles from brain science and then re-concretizing these principles in the context of digital software.
  • One point Hawkins doesn’t really cover is how a mind/brain chooses which predictions to make, from among the many possible predictions that exist.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      тут он вроде бы прав...
  • Hawkins proposes that there are neurons or neuronal groups that represent patterns as “tokens,” and that these tokens are then incorporated along with other neurons or neuronal groups into larger groupings representing more abstract patterns.  This seems clearly to be correct, but he doesn’t give much information on how these tokens are supposed to be formed. 
  • So, what’s wrong with Hawkins’ picture of brain function?  Nothing’s exactly wrong with it, so far as I can tell.
  • But Edelman then takes the concept one step further and talks about “neural maps” – assemblies of neuronal groups that carry out particular perception, cognition or action functions.  Neural maps, in essence, are sets of neuronal groups that host attractors of neurodynamics.  And Edelman then observes, astutely, that the dynamics of the population of neuronal groups, over time, is likely to obey a form of evolution by natural selection.
  • How fascinating if the brain also operates in this way!
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      да нифига... слов нет
  • Hawkins argues that creativity is essentially just metaphorical thinking, generalization based on memory.  While this is true in a grand sense, it’s not a very penetrating statement.
  • Evolutionary learning is the most powerful general search mechanism known to computer science, and is also hypothesized by Edelman to underly neural intelligence.  This sort of idea, it seems to me, should be part of any synthetic approach to brain function.
  • Hawkins mentions the notion, and observes correctly that Hebbian learning in the brain is a lot subtler than the simple version that Donald Hebb laid out in the late 40’s.   But he largely portrays these variations as biological details, and then shifts focus to the hierarchical architecture of the cortex. 
  • Hawkins’ critique of AI, which in my view is overly harsh.  He dismisses work on formal logic based reasoning as irrelevant to “real intelligence.” 
  • So – to sum up – I think Hawkins’ statements about brain function are pretty much correct
  • What he omits are, for instance,   The way the brain displays evolutionary learning as a consequence of the dynamics of multiple attractors involving sets of neural clusters The way the brain may emergently give rise to probabilistic reasoning via the statistical coordination of Hebbian learning
  • Learning of predictive patterns requires an explicit or implicit search through a large space of predictive patterns; evolutionary learning provides one approach to this problem, with computer science foundations and plausible connections to brain function; again, Hawkins does not propose any concrete alternative.
  • crucial question of how far one has to abstract away from brain function, to get to something that can be re-specialized into efficient computer software.  My intuition is that this will require a higher level of abstraction than Hawkins seems to believe.  But I stress that this is a matter of intuitive judgment – neither of us really knows.
  • Of course, to interpret the Novamente design as an “abstraction from the brain” is to interpret this phrase in a fairly extreme sense – we’re abstracting general processes like probabilistic inference and evolutionary learning and general properties like hierarchical structure from the brain, rather than particular algorithms. 
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      наконец-то он сказал это
  • Although I’m (unsurprisingly) most psyched about the Novamente approach, I think it’s also quite worthwhile to pursue AGI approaches that are closer to the brain level – there’s a large space between detailed brain simulation and Novamente, including neuron-level simulations, neural-cluster-level simulations, and so forth. 
Nikolay Sibirtsev

BRAIN ATLAS, BRAIN MAPS, BRAIN STRUCTURE, NEUROINFORMATICS, BRAIN, STEREOTAXIC ATLAS, N... - 3 views

shared by Nikolay Sibirtsev on 01 Nov 09 - Cached
  •  
    вот тоже в том же духе
mikhail-miguel

Real-time Market Map - 0 views

  •  
    GPT-3 is the world's most sophisticated natural language technology. Discover how companies are implementing AI to power new use cases.
mikhail-miguel

IMAGEAmigo - 0 views

  •  
    Compute a depth map from a single photo without a 3D camera! Cut objects out of an image, adjust focus or measure relative distances!
Matvey Ezhov

Prefrontal cortex - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  • Miller and Cohen propose an Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function. The two theorize that “cognitive control stems from the active maintenance of patterns of activity in the prefrontal cortex that represents goals and means to achieve them. They provide bias signals to other brain structures whose net effect is to guide the flow of activity along neural pathways that establish the proper mappings between inputs, internal states, and outputs needed to perform a given task” (Miller & Cohen, 2001). Essentially the two theorize that the prefrontal cortex guides the inputs and connections which allows for cognitive control of our actions.
Matvey Ezhov

Technology Review: Intelligence Explained (!) - 0 views

  • "Scientists are now able to switch the focus from particular regions of the brain to the connections between those regions," says Sherif Karama, a psychiatrist and a neuroscientist at McGill University's Montreal Neurological Institute.
  • A quantifiable "general intelligence factor," known as g, can be statistically extracted from scores on a battery of intelligence tests.
  • In 2001, Thompson showed that it is correlated with volume in the frontal cortex, a result consistent with a number of studies that have linked intelligence to overall brain size.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • In 2007, Jung and Richard Haier, now professor emeritus of psychology at the University of California, Irvine, developed the first comprehensive theory drawn from neuroimaging of how the brain gives rise to intelligence.
    • Matvey Ezhov
       
      Attention! To Research.
  • As we "evolved from worms to humans," says George Bartzokis, a professor of psychiatry at UCLA, the number of non-neural cells in the brain increased 50 times more than the number of neurons. He adds, "My hypothesis has always been that what gives us our cognitive capacity is not actually the number of neurons, which can vary tremendously between human individuals, but rather the quality of our connections."
  • The type of MRI typically used for medical scans does not show the finer details of the brain's white matter. But with a technique called diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), which uses the scanner's magnet to track the movement of water molecules in the brain, scientists have developed ways to map out neural wiring in detail. While water moves randomly within most brain tissue, it flows along the insulated neural fibers like current through a wire.
1 - 20 of 20
Showing 20 items per page