We are constantly using "filler words" because they have become ubiquitous in the English language. We place them within our writing to follow today's standard of writing.
This is literally the most irritating misused word in the entire world.
The constant incorrect usage of "literally" takes away its true meaning. This is a good explanation of the denotations of the word.
Rather than writing a lazy word, look for clearer, more descriptive language
Does this method ALWAYS work? Is there a time where it wouldn't?
an extraordinarily high percentage of entrepreneurs are dyslexic
It’s that having dyslexia, and dealing with its consequences, played a causal role in their success.
Gladwell seems oblivious to how deeply hurtful the “desirable difficulty” suggestion might be to people who have to deal with being dyslexic, and to the parents who struggle, against institutional resistance, to get their dyslexic children help.
His light entertainment is likely to make it harder for many dyslexics to gain recognition of their condition from educators, or the early diagnosis and intervention that is effective for many.
This is definitely something that MUST be considered by all writers. Is there ANYONE ELSE being impacted? How are they being impacted? Think of EVERYONE involved in the story.
So here’s an irony: what if Gladwell’s chapter makes it harder for a dyslexic to achieve the levels of success he venerates?
it has no bearing on what to do about a dyslexic child.
he’s created a meme whose existence doesn’t depend on being true.
Gladwell has a vastly larger audience and far more influence on what people think than any scientist who studies dyslexia or advocacy organizations like the International Dyslexia Association.
Important: This is the influence most journalists have on the general public as well.
, it’s rational to be concerned that Gladwell’s message of desirable difficulty will have undesirable consequences for the mass of individuals who are dyslexic.
Gladwell knows this; he just wants it also known that the condition apparently had remarkably positive effects for some people, and why.
Now parents may be faced with yet another response: dyslexia isn’t a developmental disability, it’s desirable.
Is this Gladwell’s exact message? No. Will it be taken that way? Yes. Does his book promote shallow thinking about dyslexia? Absolutely. Was Chapter 3 such a compelling, rock-solid story that it had to be told, whatever the consequences? I don’t think so.
Can this be said about any other story you've read recently?
not letting facts get in the way of a good story
Each chapter (or New Yorker article) explores an interesting, usually counterintuitive, idea by means of an engaging narrative, woven out of several types of cloth: personal biographies, telling anecdotes, research studies, expert opinions.
The average reader is not aware of what has been left out and thus can be easily mislead.
This is particularly bothersome to scientists whose own first commandment is something like: thou shalt address all relevant evidence, not merely the findings that support the most interesting, attention-getting hypothesis.
AP has had this software available for over a year. If there is going to be a change in newsrooms we will see it sooner rather than later.
StyleGuard includes current AP Stylebook guidance, with rules updated throughout the year to keep your writing covered by new additions and changes responding to news events and the evolution of the language.
Each proposed correction is clearly highlighted in the document and shows you the corresponding AP Stylebook rule, so you always know why something was corrected
This is much more than your average online dictionary. Search for quotes, look up abbreviations, find cultural definitions, look up root words and play grammar games. This site has loads of all around useful resources.
This is a video on common mistakes people make in pronunciation, spelling and word usage. I thought it was appropriate considering the Poynter assessment we have due this week.