Group items matching

in title, tags, annotations or url

Mash-up application: see on Google Earth who contributes to Wikipedia

what a live, what an interesting person!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stuxnet

Interesting competition: predicting the future of editing activity on Wikipedia

I doubt that this can work...

It turns out that falling along any straight line through the Earth takes 42 minutes (Gravity train). I think this has not been opted as an explanation of Douglas Adams' 42 but this fact is definitely quite beautiful.

In a work published on Nature (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v517/n7536/full/nature14090.html#affil-auth) a new DFT based simulation of convection in Earth's Core iron shows that electron-electron scattering has a similar contribution to electron's thermal vibration. The outcome is that using the old dynamo theory the simulation matches the Earth magnetic field experimental results, solving an 80 years old puzzle.

Yay to science! I'm always intrigued by related experiments that try to measure material properties at the GPa range. Especially, the efforts of reaching 'metallic hydrogen' (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metallic_hydrogen), requiring pressures above 25GPa at which hydrogen becomes conductive. It is thought that gas giant planets could have such a core, but no-one has been able to produce/verify this theory as off yet.

enjoy ....

ok, but if we first have to define consciousness before starting dealing with any physics, isn't a large pause looming ahead, proposed by the author?

I kind of subscribe to Tononi's information theory approach to consciousness: http://www.biolbull.org/content/215/3/216.full And of course the watered down wikipedia version for whoever lacks the patience to read the whole treatise http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory

Some people answering the question 'What's cooler than blasting space debris with lasers...?'.

If it fires in both directions, can we align it such that it deorbits two debris with one shot?

:) the idea of having this method for debris removal is actually an ACT one from Claudio Bombardelli (ACT RF in MAD https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ion-beam_shepherd). This is just a technological device to implement it so that the system on board is simplified (i.e. instead of two engines, you get away with one and a weird nozzle) Marcus, you cannot align it to get rid of two debris as you need to keep the spacecraft close to the debris as this is a long duration acion. One of the two would drift away (can only follow one!)

List anonymous wikipedia edits from interesting organizations