to reduce the chances of the LHC being derailed again by a similar accident, physicists at the Geneva lab have decided to run the collider at just half its design energy for the next 18-24 months.
3More
Pointless research: top 10 Ig Nobel award winners for silly science - Telegraph - 2 views
1More
Why We Love to Hate Awards - Freakonomics Blog - NYTimes.com - 0 views
2More
The Cutest Little Doll-Shaped Molecules You Ever Did See | Discoblog | Discover Magazine - 3 views
1More
Breaking the optical diffraction limit by a factor 3-4... ideas for telescopes? - 0 views
5More
The importance of stupidity in scientific research. - 10 views
2More
Antigravity Machine Patent Draws Physicists' Ire - 2 views
5More
Why Randomly-Selected Politicians Would Improve Democracy - Technology Review - 4 views
1More
Quantum positioning system for submarines - 0 views
1 - 20 of 20
Showing 20▼ items per page
The emeritus professor at Edinburgh University, who says he has never sent an email, browsed the internet or even made a mobile phone call, published fewer than 10 papers after his groundbreaking work, which identified the mechanism by which subatomic material acquires mass, was published in 1964.
He doubts a similar breakthrough could be achieved in today's academic culture, because of the expectations on academics to collaborate and keep churning out papers. He said: "It's difficult to imagine how I would ever have enough peace and quiet in the present sort of climate to do what I did in 1964."
Speaking to the Guardian en route to Stockholm to receive the 2013 Nobel prize for science, Higgs, 84, said he would almost certainly have been sacked had he not been nominated for the Nobel in 1980.
Edinburgh University's authorities then took the view, he later learned, that he "might get a Nobel prize - and if he doesn't we can always get rid of him".
Higgs said he became "an embarrassment to the department when they did research assessment exercises". A message would go around the department saying: "Please give a list of your recent publications." Higgs said: "I would send back a statement: 'None.' "
By the time he retired in 1996, he was uncomfortable with the new academic culture. "After I retired it was quite a long time before I went back to my department. I thought I was well out of it. It wasn't my way of doing things any more. Today I wouldn't get an academic job. It's as simple as that. I don't think I would be regarded as productive enough."
Higgs revealed that his career had also been jeopardised by his disagreements in the 1960s and 7