Skip to main content

Home/ SaveOurRights/ Group items tagged 'rule

Rss Feed Group items tagged

liveinfreedom .

The Declaration of Independence Part of American Law - 1 views

  • Because we have combined our resources into communities and states, we have also had to make certain rules for the orderly operation and use of these jointly owned facilities (roads, parks, utilities, courts, etc.) The rights to use these things are called vested rights because they do not come from the Creator and can be changed by the people. Vested rights are created to protect the three great unalienable rights of the people.
  • That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
  • Another interesting part of this ancient principle is that no agency of government has any right to exist except with the consent of the people
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • ..That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
  •  
    "Because we have combined our resources into communities and states, we have also had to make certain rules for the orderly operation and use of these jointly owned facilities (roads, parks, utilities, courts, etc.) The rights to use these things are called vested rights because they do not come from the Creator and can be changed by the people. Vested rights are created to protect the three great unalienable rights of the people."
liveinfreedom .

The ABC's of Immigration: Citizenship Rules for People Born Outside the United States -... - 0 views

  • Also, a person who is a citizen from birth cannot be denaturalized
  •  
    All persons born in the United States are citizens of the United States (with the very minor exception of certain children of diplomatic personnel). This is perhaps the only simple rule of US citizenship.
liveinfreedom .

Judge rules in favor of ICE agents suing Obama's DREAM directive - National Law Enforce... - 0 views

  •  
    "The ICE agents allege in their lawsuit that the Obama executive order causes a confusing situation in which they must choose between enforcing federal laws and being disciplined by their commanders, or obeying their supervisors thereby violating oaths of office and a Clinton administration law -- passed by a bi-partisan Congress in 1996 -- that mandates the deportation of illegal aliens."
liveinfreedom .

SHOCK REPORT - Veterans Receive Letters From VA Prohibiting Ownership or Purchase of Fi... - 1 views

  •  
    How would you feel if you received a letter from the U.S. Government informing you that because of a physical or mental condition that the government says you have it is proposing to rule that you are incompetent to handle your own financial affairs? Suppose that letter also stated that the government is going to appoint a stranger to handle your affairs for you at your expense? That would certainly be scary enough but it gets worse.
liveinfreedom .

Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts - 0 views

  •  
    WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts Court, Congress and college challenged on constitutionality Posted: January 18, 2009 12:05 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily Officials at Occidental College in Los Angeles, Calif., have been served with a demand to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980s because they could document whether he was attending as a foreign national - in one of three fronts now established by those contesting the president-elect's constitutional eligibility for the Oval Office. The Supreme Court and Congress also both are being challenged to address the worries that Obama doesn't meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the president be a "natural born" citizen. WND has reported on a long list of legal cases raising questions over the issue, and several of those have reached the U.S. Supreme Court already. Justices have so far declined to give any of the cases full hearings on their merits, but another conference remains on the Supreme Court docket for Jan. 23 on the issue. "If Obama is sworn in as president, we will file a Petition for Writ of 'Quo Warranto,' a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as president because he is 'not qualified,'" said Philip J. Berg, a lawyer who has brought several cases to court. Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, indicated the issue isn't going away. Orly Taitz, a California lawyer whose dispute remains pending before the high court, agreed, noting that one of the hearings already is scheduled for the days following Obama's inaugural on Tuesday. Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of that ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35. (Story continues below) In one of the latest
liveinfreedom .

Police & Military - Time to Choose - YouTube - 0 views

  •  
    "You took an oath to defend the constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic. The congress, the senate and the executive branch have made themselves into a domestic enemy, and they are going to attempt to use you to help them in their push to eliminate the 2nd amendment. ------"
liveinfreedom .

Michigan Law Review: Explanation of Legal Process to Obtain OBAMA BIRTH information . - 0 views

  • The Justiciability of Eligibility
  • “[j]udicial review—if any—should occur only after the electoral and Congressional processes have run their course.”
  • here is no bright-line rule for ascertaining whether an injury is sufficiently imminent to satisfy the injury-in-fact prong, but the Court has said that an asserted right to have the government act in accordance with the law is not sufficient.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • and Berg probably lack Article III standing.
  • Understood in this way, prudential standing presents formidable difficulties for these plaintiffs and, indeed, for anyone seeking to challenge a presidential candidates’ qualifications in federal court.
  • The Warth-Newdow language suggests that federal courts should be especially reluctant to find standing in cases asserting a “structural” constitutional violation—like the prohibition on members of Congress serving in the executive branch or the requirement that a president be a natural born citizen—as opposed to the violation of individual rights.
  •  
    It is doubtful, however, that they are justiciable in lower federal courts. Standing requirements and the political question doctrine make it unlikely that a federal court will reach the merits in cases of the type filed to date. Justiciable means can the case be heard in a court or not? It is believed that this issue is more properly addressed by the political process and NOT the courts.
Sue B

Conservative Advocacy for Transparency in Government & Constitutional Issues - 0 views

  •  
    Alarmed at the spot in which we now find ourselves, those of us who love liberty and choose personal responsibility and pine for limited government are now wondering what can be done to rectify this detestable mess. This website is my contribution to the cause of resistance against the Socialist State we have become. My immediate goal is to push back against legislation to further entrench the power-grabbing, aristocratic Congress and Executive branches of the federal government, what is referred to as "The Ruling Class" in "The Audacity of Common Sense".
1 - 8 of 8
Showing 20 items per page