Skip to main content

Home/ SaveOurRights/ Group items tagged of

Rss Feed Group items tagged

liveinfreedom .

Are Marco Rubio and Bobby Jindal Natural-born Citizens? - 0 views

  • Lately, however, percolating up from the cauldron of the alternative press have come questions as to whether Rubio and Jindal meet the Constitution’s requirement that presidents of the United States be “natural born citizens.” Naturally, the mainstream of the conservative press have written in defense of the men’s eligibility.”
  • Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government and to declare expressly that the Command in Chief of the american army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.
  • Therefore, despite their undeniable appeal to many in the Republican Party and perhaps to Mitt Romney, as well, it seems that neither Marco Rubio nor Bobby Jindal meets the constitutional definition of a natural born citizen.
  •  
    "Florida Senator Marco Rubio (pictured, left) and Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal (right) are very popular and have a significant number of admirers in the ranks of the GOP. Both men are considered Tea Party-approved choices and are widely regarded as "conservatives" and "populists," thus good matches for the more buttoned-down establishment-type image held by Mitt Romney. Lately, however, percolating up from the cauldron of the alternative press have come questions as to whether Rubio and Jindal meet the Constitution's requirement that presidents of the United States be "natural born citizens." Naturally, the mainstream of the conservative press have written in defense of the men's eligibility.""
liveinfreedom .

Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts - 0 views

  •  
    WND Exclusive OBAMA WATCH CENTRAL Eligibility battle rages on 3 fronts Court, Congress and college challenged on constitutionality Posted: January 18, 2009 12:05 am Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2009 WorldNetDaily Officials at Occidental College in Los Angeles, Calif., have been served with a demand to produce records concerning Barack Obama's attendance there during the 1980s because they could document whether he was attending as a foreign national - in one of three fronts now established by those contesting the president-elect's constitutional eligibility for the Oval Office. The Supreme Court and Congress also both are being challenged to address the worries that Obama doesn't meet the requirements of the U.S. Constitution that the president be a "natural born" citizen. WND has reported on a long list of legal cases raising questions over the issue, and several of those have reached the U.S. Supreme Court already. Justices have so far declined to give any of the cases full hearings on their merits, but another conference remains on the Supreme Court docket for Jan. 23 on the issue. "If Obama is sworn in as president, we will file a Petition for Writ of 'Quo Warranto,' a case that will challenge Obama as being ineligible to serve as president because he is 'not qualified,'" said Philip J. Berg, a lawyer who has brought several cases to court. Berg, whose information is on his ObamaCrimes.com website, indicated the issue isn't going away. Orly Taitz, a California lawyer whose dispute remains pending before the high court, agreed, noting that one of the hearings already is scheduled for the days following Obama's inaugural on Tuesday. Taitz said her arguments rest on precedents from both the California Supreme Court, which years ago removed a candidate for president from the ballot because he was only 34, and the U.S. Supreme Court's affirmation of that ruling. The Constitution requires a president to be 35. (Story continues below) In one of the latest
liveinfreedom .

OBAMA (THE FRAUD) MUST STAND UP NOW OR STEP DOWN --IMMEDIATELY - 0 views

  • only “a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President” (Article II, Section 1, Clause 4). And Obama clearly was not “a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of th[e] Constitution.”
  • Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders.
  • Therefore, anyone who claims eligibility for “the Office of President” must, when credibly challenged, establish his qualifications in this regard with sufficient evidence.
  •  
    USA citizens have "unalienable rights given by the creator". These rights cannot be taken away or given away by the right's possessor. Obama is violating our rights to know if he is a "natural born system" required to be the president of the USA. He is also by sworn oath supposed to uphold and defend the Constitution.as a senator of the USA and Illinoise and as an officer of the court. OBAMA is violating OUR (330 million of us) CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS. WE DON'T NEED A LAW BREAKER FOR PRESIDENT
liveinfreedom .

PETITION TO STOP OBAMA -- He has NOT PROVEN HE IS A USA CITIZEN. IT IS BELIEVED HE IS A... - 0 views

  •  
    A lawsuit in Honolulu in the First District Court is seeking a court-order to open Obama's secret birth records. Obama has thus far neglected a Freedom of Information request for the records at two hospitals in Hawaii. Obama has expended apx. 200,000 to NOT provide his citizenship becasue it is suspected that he used FORGED documents to become senator of statd and federal governments.\n\nArticle II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution reads: "No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.
liveinfreedom .

Unalienable Rights vs Inalienable Rights - 0 views

  • In the second article of the Declaration of Rights, which was made part of the late Constitution of Pennsylvania, it is declared: 'That all men have a natural and unalienable right to worship Almighty God, according to the dictates of their own
  •  
    "In the second article of the Declaration of Rights, which was made part of the late Constitution of Pennsylvania, it is declared: 'That all men have a natural and unalienable right to worship Almighty God, according to the dictates of their own "
liveinfreedom .

The Declaration of Independence Part of American Law - 1 views

  • Because we have combined our resources into communities and states, we have also had to make certain rules for the orderly operation and use of these jointly owned facilities (roads, parks, utilities, courts, etc.) The rights to use these things are called vested rights because they do not come from the Creator and can be changed by the people. Vested rights are created to protect the three great unalienable rights of the people.
  • That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.
  • Another interesting part of this ancient principle is that no agency of government has any right to exist except with the consent of the people
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • ..That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.
  •  
    "Because we have combined our resources into communities and states, we have also had to make certain rules for the orderly operation and use of these jointly owned facilities (roads, parks, utilities, courts, etc.) The rights to use these things are called vested rights because they do not come from the Creator and can be changed by the people. Vested rights are created to protect the three great unalienable rights of the people."
liveinfreedom .

Avalon Project - Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776 - 0 views

  • certain unalienable rights;
  •  
    "Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776 When in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. "
liveinfreedom .

Defining Natural-Born Citizen - The Federalist Blog - 0 views

  • “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States.
  • Not owing allegiance to anybody else.”
  • Congress issued a joint congressional report on June 22, 1874 that said the “United States have not recognized a double allegiance.”
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, wherever it is capable of being exerted, is to he dreaded more than the plague. The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against; their total exclusion from a station to which foreign nations have been accustomed to, attach ideas of sovereign power, sacredness of character, and hereditary right, is a measure of the most consummate policy and wisdom.
  • What better way to insure attachment to the country then to require the President to have inherited his American citizenship through his American father and not through a foreig
  • A person who had been born under a double allegiance cannot be said to be a natural-born citizen of the United States because such status is not recognized (only in fiction of law).
  • A child born to an American mother and alien father could be said to be a citizen of the United States by some affirmative act of law but never entitled to be a natural-born citizen because through laws of nature the child inherits the condition of their father.
liveinfreedom .

Michigan Law Review Constitution - 0 views

  • Congressional power to withhold citizenship from children of U.S. citizens is not hypothetical; for decades, it was law, and to some extent still is. The Tribe-Olson Opinion proposes that “[i]t goes without saying that the Framers did not intend to exclude a person from the office of the President simply because he or she was born to U.S. citizens serving in the U.S. military outside of the continental United States . . . .” However, the Seventh Congress, which included Framers Gouverneur Morris and Abraham Baldwin among others, did precisely that. In 1961 in Montana v. Kennedy, the Supreme Court construed an 1802 statute to mean that “[f]oreign-born children of persons who became American citizens between April 14, 1802 and 1854, were aliens . . . .” Thus, children of members of the armed forces serving overseas, and diplomats and civil servants in foreign posts, were not only not natural born citizens eligible to be president, they were not citizens at all.
  •  
    The citizenship of those born in the Canal Zone in 1936 is a legal question, not a question about one's views of Senator McCain's candidacy. U.S. citizenship law is not simple or intuitive.
Sue B

Investigating Obama: Grand Jury Recommends: Indict Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Obama - 0 views

  •  
    Americans are educated to believe that America has three branches of government: The Judicial, The Legislative and the Executive and that is they who decide our lives. This also is false. There is a Constitutional force which has power, authority and dominance over those three branches. That is the The Grand Jury of We the People. The Grand Jury was intended to give the people of the United States of America total control over a potentially corrupt government and to enable prosecution of corrupt or criminal government officials, agents and employees, whether they were elected, hired or appointed.
  •  
    Americans are educated to believe that America has three branches of government: The Judicial, The Legislative and the Executive and that is they who decide our lives. This also is false. There is a Constitutional force which has power, authority and dominance over those three branches. That is the The Grand Jury of We the People. The Grand Jury was intended to give the people of the United States of America total control over a potentially corrupt government and to enable prosecution of corrupt or criminal government officials, agents and employees, whether they were elected, hired or appointed.
liveinfreedom .

Angry Muslims Throw Shoes at Pictures of Obama « From the Desk of Harold Poole - 0 views

  •  
    "So much for the myth that President-elect Obama's ascension to the presidency would magically improve our standing in the world. Over the weekend, angry Muslims in Tehran threw shoes at pictures of Obama and dragged portraits of him through the streets. And Hugo Chavez, the dictator of Venezuela, said
liveinfreedom .

Executive Order: Granting Reciprocity on Excepted Service and Federal Contractor Employ... - 0 views

  •  
    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 1104(a)(1), 3301, and 7301 of title 5, United States Code, and in order to simplify and streamline the system of Federal Government personnel investigative and adjudicative processes to make them more efficient and effective, it is hereby ordered as follows:
liveinfreedom .

The ABC's of Immigration: Citizenship Rules for People Born Outside the United States -... - 0 views

  • Also, a person who is a citizen from birth cannot be denaturalized
  •  
    All persons born in the United States are citizens of the United States (with the very minor exception of certain children of diplomatic personnel). This is perhaps the only simple rule of US citizenship.
liveinfreedom .

We The People Foundation - 0 views

  •  
    On October 24, 2008, a federal judge granted your request to dismiss a lawsuit by Citizen Philip Berg, who challenged your eligibility under the "Natural Born Citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution to legally hold the office of President of the United States of America.
liveinfreedom .

Edwin Vieira, Jr. -- Obama Must Stand Up Now or Step Down - 0 views

  • America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is “a natural born Citizen” of the United States who has not renounced his American citizenship—or he must step down as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President of the United States
  • And if each of the General Government’s powers must be proven (not simply presumed) to exist, then every requirement that the Constitution sets for any individual’s exercise of those powers must also be proven (not simply presumed) to be fully satisfied before that individual may exercise any of those powers.
  • Now that Obama’s citizenship has been seriously questioned, the burden of proof rests squarely on his shoulders.
  •  
    America is facing potentially the gravest constitutional crisis in her history. Barack Obama must either stand up in a public forum and prove, with conclusive documentary evidence, that he is "a natural born Citizen" of the United States
liveinfreedom .

Press Release: Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama Obama is NOT QUALIFIE... - 0 views

  •  
    Unless proven otherwise Barack Obama "may" be an illegal immigrant according to reviews of existing facts concerning Obamas birth certificates. Obama has NOT satifactorily proved his birth as being a "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" of America, nor has he responded to lawsuits filed in Federal courts to prove his NATURAL BORN citizenship. If he is a NATURALIZED citizen from Indonesia then he cannot be the president and is VIOLATING our social CONTRACT between all Americas citizens..,.it is called the UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.\n\nFor Immediate Release: - 10/21/08 - Complete contact details and pdfs of this press release and motions filed by plaintiff Berg today are at the end of this article
liveinfreedom .

Congress has a Constitution problem - many don't understand document - Washington Times - 0 views

  • Each of them takes an oath to defend the Constitution, but many House lawmakers either don’t understand the founding document or don’t take its precepts seriously, according to an analysis by The Washington Times that studied the constitutional backing that representatives submitted for each of the more than 3,000 bills they introduced in 2011.
  •  
    "Each of them takes an oath to defend the Constitution, but many House lawmakers either don't understand the founding document or don't take its precepts seriously, according to an analysis by The Washington Times that studied the constitutional backing that representatives submitted for each of the more than 3,000 bills they introduced in 2011."
liveinfreedom .

The end of the constitutional republic? - 0 views

  •  
    The events that mark the end of one form of government and the beginning of another are more easily perceived and understood in the aftermath than by those caught up in the events and circumstances that constitute the transformation.
liveinfreedom .

Carl Sciortino: Marxist Musical Chairs in Massachusetts - 0 views

  •  
    "Serving in the Massachusetts State Legislature since 2004, Sciortino has been backed by Boston Democratic Socialists of America his entire term of office. If he makes it to Congress, Sciortino will join a long list of Reps. who owe their careers, at least partially, to the US' largest Marxist organization."
liveinfreedom .

Judge rules in favor of ICE agents suing Obama's DREAM directive - National Law Enforce... - 0 views

  •  
    "The ICE agents allege in their lawsuit that the Obama executive order causes a confusing situation in which they must choose between enforcing federal laws and being disciplined by their commanders, or obeying their supervisors thereby violating oaths of office and a Clinton administration law -- passed by a bi-partisan Congress in 1996 -- that mandates the deportation of illegal aliens."
1 - 20 of 95 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page