These two examplar design of well-structured questions are useful in formulating discussion topics.

Well said. I couldn't agree with you more.

I like this website, found on MERLOT, because the course materials are well-organized, and it's one of the few resources on MERLOT that talk about moral theories. It would be a good online resources for Module 2 in my class. Using these online resources allows learners to have a common ground of sharing thoughts and reference, in addition to pointing out page numbers on the textbook. The main problem, like most of the resources, is that it's just an online presentation of printed materials (like an online version of class handout, except that some else prepared the handout). The true potential of online multimedia environment has not been realized yet.

I like this statement. I've never thought of the importance of a dialogue between student's and teacher's idea of teaching and learning.

This is another useful website that provides some online quiz-like tests for learners to get familiar with basic ideas of argument, such as validity. These questions are designed in a preliminary way, i.e., web 1.0 way. Limited interactivity, lack of multimedia components, and, frankly, quite boring. I wouldn't use it in my class.

I can't find too many online resources for philosophy-related courses. This, however, is very nice. It offers a flash presentation of the very basics in understanding argument. This topic is so basic that it almost occurs in the beginning week(s) of every intro level philosophy courses, such as Critical Thinking and Moral Choices. I plan to use this website as the readings for Module 1. I could have prepared this contents in my class, but bring the learners to an internet resource as an alternative medium of learning is part of the learning goals, as well, so I will do it. Question. Do I need to acquire permission from the owner in order to use it in my class? Given that it appears on MERLOT, does MERLOT ask contributors to share the right of fair use?